ACCURACY VERSUS COMPLEXITY TRADE-OFF IN VaR MODELING: COULD TECHNICAL ANALYSIS BE A SOLUTION?

Q3 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Journal of Financial Management Markets and Institutions Pub Date : 2019-10-22 DOI:10.1142/s2282717x19500038
Evangelos Vasileiou
{"title":"ACCURACY VERSUS COMPLEXITY TRADE-OFF IN VaR MODELING: COULD TECHNICAL ANALYSIS BE A SOLUTION?","authors":"Evangelos Vasileiou","doi":"10.1142/s2282717x19500038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Accurate Value at Risk (VaR) estimations are crucial for the robustness and stability of a financial system. Even though significant advances have been made in the field of risk modeling, many crises have emerged during the same period, and an explanation for this is that the advanced models are not widely applied in the financial industry due to their mathematical complexity. In contrast to the mathematically complex models that torture the data in the output stage, we suggest a new approach that filters the data inputs, based on Technical Analysis (TA) signals. When the trading signals suggest that the conditions are positive (negative) for investments we use data from the previously documented positive (negative) periods in order to calculate the VaR. In this way, we use input data that are more representative of the financial conditions under examination and thus VaR estimations are more accurate and more representative (nonprocyclical) than the conventional models’ estimation that use the last nonfiltered [Formula: see text]-day observations. Testing our assumptions in the US stock market for the period 2000–2017, the empirical data confirmed our hypothesis. Moreover, we suggest specific legislative adjustments that contribute to more accurate and representative VaR estimations: (i) an extra backtesting procedure at a lower than the 99% confidence level as a procyclicality test and (ii) to ease the minimum requirement of 250 observations that is currently the input threshold because it leads to less accurate VaR estimations.","PeriodicalId":34440,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Financial Management Markets and Institutions","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Financial Management Markets and Institutions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/s2282717x19500038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Accurate Value at Risk (VaR) estimations are crucial for the robustness and stability of a financial system. Even though significant advances have been made in the field of risk modeling, many crises have emerged during the same period, and an explanation for this is that the advanced models are not widely applied in the financial industry due to their mathematical complexity. In contrast to the mathematically complex models that torture the data in the output stage, we suggest a new approach that filters the data inputs, based on Technical Analysis (TA) signals. When the trading signals suggest that the conditions are positive (negative) for investments we use data from the previously documented positive (negative) periods in order to calculate the VaR. In this way, we use input data that are more representative of the financial conditions under examination and thus VaR estimations are more accurate and more representative (nonprocyclical) than the conventional models’ estimation that use the last nonfiltered [Formula: see text]-day observations. Testing our assumptions in the US stock market for the period 2000–2017, the empirical data confirmed our hypothesis. Moreover, we suggest specific legislative adjustments that contribute to more accurate and representative VaR estimations: (i) an extra backtesting procedure at a lower than the 99% confidence level as a procyclicality test and (ii) to ease the minimum requirement of 250 observations that is currently the input threshold because it leads to less accurate VaR estimations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
VaR模型的准确性与复杂性权衡:技术分析能解决问题吗?
准确的风险值(VaR)估计对金融系统的稳健性和稳定性至关重要。尽管在风险建模领域取得了重大进展,但在同一时期出现了许多危机,对此的解释是,由于其数学复杂性,先进的模型在金融行业中没有得到广泛应用。与在输出阶段折磨数据的数学复杂模型相反,我们提出了一种基于技术分析(TA)信号过滤数据输入的新方法。当交易信号表明投资条件为正(负)时,我们使用先前记录的正(负)时期的数据来计算VaR。通过这种方式,我们使用更能代表所检查的财务状况的输入数据,因此VaR估计比使用最后一个非过滤[公式:见文本]日观察的传统模型估计更准确,更具代表性(非顺周期)。通过对2000-2017年美国股市的实证数据验证了我们的假设。此外,我们建议进行具体的立法调整,以促进更准确和更具代表性的VaR估计:(i)在低于99%置信水平的情况下进行额外的回测程序,作为顺周期性检验;(ii)放宽250个观测值的最低要求,目前这是输入阈值,因为它导致VaR估计不太准确。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Financial Management Markets and Institutions
Journal of Financial Management Markets and Institutions Economics, Econometrics and Finance-General Economics, Econometrics and Finance
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Analysing banks' performance during the recent breakdowns. Which were its main drivers? Sustainability Reporting: Evidence From Global Systemically Important Banks (G-SIBs) Risk Mapping as a Form of Banking Immunity Response to Covid-19 Pandemic Green Finance: past, present and future studies The Impact of SFAS166/167 on Bank Liquidity and Lending
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1