Writing Assessment in the Humanities: Culture and Methodology

Jason M. Barrett
{"title":"Writing Assessment in the Humanities: Culture and Methodology","authors":"Jason M. Barrett","doi":"10.2307/jasseinsteffe.1.1.0059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines methodological and institutional challenges for empirically measuring student performance on writing. Writing’s intrinsic subjectivity and the great variety of writing formats appropriate to diverse contexts raise fundamental questions about the empirical bias of the assessment culture taking root in U.S. higher education. At the same time, the academic training of humanist scholars, who typically have primary responsibility for writing pedagogy in universities, may predispose them to skepticism about assessment culture’s broader mission. This article narrates the process by which the Humanities Department at Lawrence Technological University implemented a writing assessment process designed to address these challenges and evaluates the data generated by this process.","PeriodicalId":56185,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Assessment and Institutional Effectiveness","volume":"1 1","pages":"171 - 195"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Assessment and Institutional Effectiveness","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/jasseinsteffe.1.1.0059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article examines methodological and institutional challenges for empirically measuring student performance on writing. Writing’s intrinsic subjectivity and the great variety of writing formats appropriate to diverse contexts raise fundamental questions about the empirical bias of the assessment culture taking root in U.S. higher education. At the same time, the academic training of humanist scholars, who typically have primary responsibility for writing pedagogy in universities, may predispose them to skepticism about assessment culture’s broader mission. This article narrates the process by which the Humanities Department at Lawrence Technological University implemented a writing assessment process designed to address these challenges and evaluates the data generated by this process.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人文写作评估:文化与方法
这篇文章探讨了方法和制度上的挑战,以经验衡量学生的写作表现。写作的内在主观性和适合不同背景的写作形式的多样性,对扎根于美国高等教育的评估文化的经验偏见提出了根本性的问题。与此同时,人文主义学者的学术培训(他们通常对大学的写作教学负有主要责任)可能使他们对评估文化的更广泛使命持怀疑态度。本文叙述了劳伦斯科技大学人文系实施写作评估过程的过程,该过程旨在解决这些挑战,并评估该过程产生的数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal of Assessment and Institutional Effectiveness publishes scholarly work on the assessment of student learning at the course, program, institutional, and multi-institutional levels as well as more broadly focused scholarship on institutional effectiveness in relation to mission and emerging directions in higher education assessment. JAIE is the official publication of the New England Educational Assessment Network, established in 1995 and recognized as one of the leaders in supporting best practices and resources in educational assessment.
期刊最新文献
Another Silo Isn’t the Answer: A Collaborative Approach to Assessment “With the Kindness Shown to Me”: Assessing Remote Teaching and Learning Strategies in a Time of Pandemic Grades and Learning It’s a Matter of Trust: Why Grades Are Persona non Grata in Assessment Ungrading: Why Rating Students Undermines Learning (and What to Do Instead)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1