Murine Models of Endometriosis: A Systematic Review

Pub Date : 2021-01-14 DOI:10.15296/ijwhr.2022.23
Hayedeh Hoorsan, M. Simbar, F. Ramezani Tehrani, F. Fathi, N. Mosaffa, H. Riazi, O. Banafshi
{"title":"Murine Models of Endometriosis: A Systematic Review","authors":"Hayedeh Hoorsan, M. Simbar, F. Ramezani Tehrani, F. Fathi, N. Mosaffa, H. Riazi, O. Banafshi","doi":"10.15296/ijwhr.2022.23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: This review inspects the usage of animal models and the practical solutions of this method for different challenges of endometriosis. The objectives of the study are to determine and compare the histopathology, biomarkers, and development of endometrial lesions in murine homologous and heterologous endometriosis models. Methods: The literature search was performed on PubMed, Scopus, Web Cochrane, and EMBASE from January 1990 to January 2019. Experimental articles in which the establishment of the endometriosis model had been proven through the examination of size, weight, number of implants, adhesion, histologic score, and altered biomarker were eligible for inclusion. Results: Based on type of induction, articles were categorized into two groups: heterologous-induced method (n=5) and autologousinduced method (n=13). In general, in case of establishing the heterologous induction method is less reliable than the autologous induction method. Conclusions: Using human endometrial tissues for endometrial inductions is possible in heterologous models under immunosuppression, which is more suitable for therapeutic studies, but time limitation considerations are mandatory for this type of model. Homologous endometriosis inductions cause larger endometrial lesions, biomarkers, and reproduction rate changes similar to those occurring in humans. Similarities make this method more appropriate for pathogenesis and genetic studies and also observe the impact of endometriosis on the next generation. Choosing an appropriate model for the induction of endometriosis is dependent on the purpose of each study.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15296/ijwhr.2022.23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This review inspects the usage of animal models and the practical solutions of this method for different challenges of endometriosis. The objectives of the study are to determine and compare the histopathology, biomarkers, and development of endometrial lesions in murine homologous and heterologous endometriosis models. Methods: The literature search was performed on PubMed, Scopus, Web Cochrane, and EMBASE from January 1990 to January 2019. Experimental articles in which the establishment of the endometriosis model had been proven through the examination of size, weight, number of implants, adhesion, histologic score, and altered biomarker were eligible for inclusion. Results: Based on type of induction, articles were categorized into two groups: heterologous-induced method (n=5) and autologousinduced method (n=13). In general, in case of establishing the heterologous induction method is less reliable than the autologous induction method. Conclusions: Using human endometrial tissues for endometrial inductions is possible in heterologous models under immunosuppression, which is more suitable for therapeutic studies, but time limitation considerations are mandatory for this type of model. Homologous endometriosis inductions cause larger endometrial lesions, biomarkers, and reproduction rate changes similar to those occurring in humans. Similarities make this method more appropriate for pathogenesis and genetic studies and also observe the impact of endometriosis on the next generation. Choosing an appropriate model for the induction of endometriosis is dependent on the purpose of each study.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
子宫内膜异位症小鼠模型:系统综述
目的:本文综述了动物模型的使用和该方法在不同挑战子宫内膜异位症中的实际解决方案。本研究的目的是确定和比较小鼠同种和异体子宫内膜异位症模型的组织病理学、生物标志物和子宫内膜病变的发展。方法:检索1990年1月至2019年1月PubMed、Scopus、Web Cochrane和EMBASE的文献。通过检查大小、重量、植入物数量、粘连、组织学评分和改变的生物标志物来证明子宫内膜异位症模型建立的实验文章符合入选条件。结果:按诱导方式将文献分为异种诱导法(n=5)和自体诱导法(n=13)两组。一般情况下,在建立异源诱导法的情况下,其可靠性不如自体诱导法。结论:在免疫抑制的异种模型中,使用人子宫内膜组织进行子宫内膜诱导是可行的,更适合治疗性研究,但这类模型必须考虑时间限制。同源子宫内膜异位症诱导引起更大的子宫内膜病变、生物标志物和生殖率变化,类似于人类发生的变化。相似之处使得这种方法更适合于发病机理和遗传学研究,也可以观察子宫内膜异位症对下一代的影响。选择一个合适的模型来诱导子宫内膜异位症取决于每个研究的目的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1