A cross-sectional assessment of package labels aimed at children of edible and leaf cannabis discarded in New York City

Adam Blumenberg
{"title":"A cross-sectional assessment of package labels aimed at children of edible and leaf cannabis discarded in New York City","authors":"Adam Blumenberg","doi":"10.1080/24734306.2022.2106397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background Cannabis is a schedule 1 substance that cannot be possessed within the United States according to federal law. On March 31 2021, New York State legalized cannabis for sale and consumption. This study assesses the safety labeling and packaging aimed at children of cannabis containers during the peri-legalization period in New York City. Methods This is a cross-sectional and descriptive comparative study in which sidewalks in New York City were inspected for labeled cannabis containers during the four months prior and four months post legalization, i.e. from December 2020 until July 2021. Packages were systematically analyzed using a scoring system based on advertising techniques that may appeal to children and the American College of Medical Toxicology’s (ACMT) recommendations on cannabis safety labeling. Results and DiscussionOf the 114 packages, none met ACMT’s recommended safety labeling guidelines. Only 52% of containers indicated their contents, 40% referenced food, and 85% included elements that may appeal to children. Conclusion Precautionary measures such as child-resistant packaging, warning labels, and avoiding marketing to children are uncommon. Policy makers should consider regulating the safety labeling and advertising which appeals to children on cannabis packaging.","PeriodicalId":23139,"journal":{"name":"Toxicology communications","volume":"50 1","pages":"78 - 84"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxicology communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24734306.2022.2106397","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Background Cannabis is a schedule 1 substance that cannot be possessed within the United States according to federal law. On March 31 2021, New York State legalized cannabis for sale and consumption. This study assesses the safety labeling and packaging aimed at children of cannabis containers during the peri-legalization period in New York City. Methods This is a cross-sectional and descriptive comparative study in which sidewalks in New York City were inspected for labeled cannabis containers during the four months prior and four months post legalization, i.e. from December 2020 until July 2021. Packages were systematically analyzed using a scoring system based on advertising techniques that may appeal to children and the American College of Medical Toxicology’s (ACMT) recommendations on cannabis safety labeling. Results and DiscussionOf the 114 packages, none met ACMT’s recommended safety labeling guidelines. Only 52% of containers indicated their contents, 40% referenced food, and 85% included elements that may appeal to children. Conclusion Precautionary measures such as child-resistant packaging, warning labels, and avoiding marketing to children are uncommon. Policy makers should consider regulating the safety labeling and advertising which appeals to children on cannabis packaging.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对纽约市丢弃的食用大麻和叶子大麻的儿童包装标签的横断面评估
根据联邦法律,大麻是一种附表1物质,不能在美国境内拥有。2021年3月31日,纽约州将大麻销售和消费合法化。本研究评估了纽约市大麻容器在准合法化期间针对儿童的安全标签和包装。这是一项横断面和描述性比较研究,研究人员在大麻合法化之前和之后的四个月(即2020年12月至2021年7月)对纽约市人行道上的标签大麻容器进行了检查。使用基于可能吸引儿童的广告技术和美国医学毒理学学院(ACMT)关于大麻安全标签的建议的评分系统对包装进行了系统分析。结果和讨论在114个包装中,没有一个符合ACMT推荐的安全标签指南。只有52%的容器标明了它们的内容,40%提到了食物,85%包含了可能吸引儿童的元素。结论预防措施如防儿童包装、警示标签、避免向儿童销售的情况较少。决策者应考虑规范大麻包装上吸引儿童的安全标签和广告。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Thermal injury after “huffing” compressed air duster: a case report Cyanide poisoning and organ donation in Australia: a case report Accuracy of plant identification applications to identify plants in suspected poisoning cases referred to the Queensland Poisons Information Centre Abstracts of the Toxicology and Poisons Network Australasia (TAPNA) 2024 Annual Scientific Meeting (Melbourne, Victoria). Death from bongkrekic acid toxicity: first report in North America
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1