Jämställdhet i grundskolan

Ida Legnemark, M. Hugo
{"title":"Jämställdhet i grundskolan","authors":"Ida Legnemark, M. Hugo","doi":"10.24834/educare.2023.1.901","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the study is to explore how the concept of gender equality and the compulsory school’s gender equality mission can be understood in national policy documents. The study is a critical document study that takes critical discourse analysis as a starting point. In the policy documents reviewed, four different discourses on gender equality appear: Gender equality as a non-question – discourse of equal treatment, which turns out as an absence of the concept of gender equality or as an understanding of gender equality as equal treatment or anti-discrimination. Focus on biological sex – discourse of difference, where the focus on biological sex means that differences between girls and boys are explained as natural and essential. Gender equality as a matter of quality, where gender equality is understood as a means to an end rather than a value of its own, and finally Gender as a Swedish virtue, where gender equality is explained as something that the school needs to teach people with a non-Swedish background. The different discourses all relate to a neo-liberal hegemony, in which the understanding of gender equality implies a non-existing space to promote a change of power relations.","PeriodicalId":34339,"journal":{"name":"Educare","volume":"43 6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24834/educare.2023.1.901","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of the study is to explore how the concept of gender equality and the compulsory school’s gender equality mission can be understood in national policy documents. The study is a critical document study that takes critical discourse analysis as a starting point. In the policy documents reviewed, four different discourses on gender equality appear: Gender equality as a non-question – discourse of equal treatment, which turns out as an absence of the concept of gender equality or as an understanding of gender equality as equal treatment or anti-discrimination. Focus on biological sex – discourse of difference, where the focus on biological sex means that differences between girls and boys are explained as natural and essential. Gender equality as a matter of quality, where gender equality is understood as a means to an end rather than a value of its own, and finally Gender as a Swedish virtue, where gender equality is explained as something that the school needs to teach people with a non-Swedish background. The different discourses all relate to a neo-liberal hegemony, in which the understanding of gender equality implies a non-existing space to promote a change of power relations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
本研究的目的是探讨性别平等的概念和义务教育的性别平等使命如何在国家政策文件中理解。本研究是以批评话语分析为出发点的批判性文献研究。在所审查的政策文件中,出现了四种不同的性别平等话语:性别平等作为一个非问题-平等待遇话语,这是一种对性别平等概念的缺乏,或者是将性别平等理解为平等待遇或反歧视。关注生理性别-差异话语,其中对生理性别的关注意味着女孩和男孩之间的差异被解释为自然和必要的。性别平等是一种质量问题,性别平等被理解为达到目的的一种手段,而不是其本身的价值,最后性别平等是一种瑞典美德,性别平等被解释为学校需要教给非瑞典背景的人的东西。不同的话语都与新自由主义霸权有关,其中对性别平等的理解意味着一个不存在的空间来促进权力关系的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
86
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊最新文献
”Jag ville testa på att plugga på universitetet… och så ville jag få jobba med barn” Att genomföra systematiska barnsamtal — till nytta för hållbarhet i förskolan Svenskämnesdidaktik som akademiskt professionsfält Att läsa bedömningsuppdraget Lärarstudenters förutsättningar att utveckla yrkesspecifika kunskaper
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1