Totalitarian school politics during fascism in Italy and their transgenerational effects

IF 0.6 Q3 HISTORY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES History of Education Review Pub Date : 2018-10-01 DOI:10.1108/HER-03-2018-0010
Annemarie Augschöll
{"title":"Totalitarian school politics during fascism in Italy and their transgenerational effects","authors":"Annemarie Augschöll","doi":"10.1108/HER-03-2018-0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe research is rooted in the interest in educational biographies of ethnic and linguistic minorities in Europe during the twentieth century. The purpose of this paper is to give an answer to the question of how the nationalistic educational norms during the period of totalitarian regimes manifested themselves in the educational biographies of minorities, and how much individuals and collectives transferred their scholastic denationalisation experiences (e.g. prohibition of alphabetisation in their mother tongue) to the following generations. In other words, if and how traces of the previously named experiences, for example the attitude towards education, can be found in insecurities and attitudes of the first or even the second follow-up generation.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe theoretical foundation used for this research is the conception of school as “institutional actor” theorised by Helmut Fend (2006). Fend used a widened concept based upon Weber’s (1922/1988) action-theoretical, Luhmann’s (2002) system-theoretical and Scharpf’s (2000) and Schaefers’ (2002) institution-centred approaches. This scientific background designs a theoretical concept of school fitted for the social and pedagogical research field. Specifically, in Fend’s analysis of design- and action-oriented potentials, Fend (2006) “turns his special attention to the processes in the educational field, which are implemented by actors, who themselves act in the context of institutional framework conditions” (p. 17).\n\n\nFindings\nThe experience of school in totalitarian contexts manifests itself in individual and collective memories, later found in the following generations with particular emphasis on the approaches towards education.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis paper analyses the transgenerational impact of the experiences ethnical minorities had with schools.\n","PeriodicalId":43049,"journal":{"name":"History of Education Review","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History of Education Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/HER-03-2018-0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Purpose The research is rooted in the interest in educational biographies of ethnic and linguistic minorities in Europe during the twentieth century. The purpose of this paper is to give an answer to the question of how the nationalistic educational norms during the period of totalitarian regimes manifested themselves in the educational biographies of minorities, and how much individuals and collectives transferred their scholastic denationalisation experiences (e.g. prohibition of alphabetisation in their mother tongue) to the following generations. In other words, if and how traces of the previously named experiences, for example the attitude towards education, can be found in insecurities and attitudes of the first or even the second follow-up generation. Design/methodology/approach The theoretical foundation used for this research is the conception of school as “institutional actor” theorised by Helmut Fend (2006). Fend used a widened concept based upon Weber’s (1922/1988) action-theoretical, Luhmann’s (2002) system-theoretical and Scharpf’s (2000) and Schaefers’ (2002) institution-centred approaches. This scientific background designs a theoretical concept of school fitted for the social and pedagogical research field. Specifically, in Fend’s analysis of design- and action-oriented potentials, Fend (2006) “turns his special attention to the processes in the educational field, which are implemented by actors, who themselves act in the context of institutional framework conditions” (p. 17). Findings The experience of school in totalitarian contexts manifests itself in individual and collective memories, later found in the following generations with particular emphasis on the approaches towards education. Originality/value This paper analyses the transgenerational impact of the experiences ethnical minorities had with schools.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
意大利法西斯时期的极权主义学校政治及其跨代影响
本研究源于对二十世纪欧洲少数民族和语言少数民族教育传记的兴趣。本文的目的是回答极权主义政权时期的民族主义教育规范如何在少数民族的教育传记中表现出来的问题,以及个人和集体将他们的学术非国家化经验(例如禁止在他们的母语中按字母顺序排列)转移到后代的程度。换句话说,前面提到的经历的痕迹,例如对教育的态度,是否以及如何可以在第一代甚至第二代的不安全感和态度中找到。设计/方法/方法本研究使用的理论基础是赫尔穆特·芬德(2006)提出的学校作为“制度行动者”的概念。在韦伯(1922/1988)的行动理论、卢曼(2002)的系统理论以及沙普夫(2000)和舍费尔斯(2002)的制度中心方法的基础上,芬德使用了一个更广泛的概念。这一科学背景设计了一个适合社会和教学研究领域的学校理论概念。具体来说,在芬德对设计和行动导向潜能的分析中,芬德(2006)“将他的特别关注转向教育领域的过程,这些过程是由行动者实施的,他们自己在制度框架条件的背景下行动”(第17页)。极权主义背景下的学校经历表现在个人和集体的记忆中,后来在后代中发现,特别强调教育的方法。原创性/价值本文分析了少数民族与学校的经历所产生的跨代影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
History of Education Review
History of Education Review HISTORY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊最新文献
The demise of school-developed elective courses in NSW: a case study in centralisation “A pleasant walk on the Pakihi”: ecological orientations in mid-century nature study Enchanting things: the scientific communication of Julius Sumner Miller The Endeavour scholarships program in the era of the Asian century: promise unfulfilled Changing policy, changing plans: responses to the end of fee-free education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1