White Subversion of Public School Desegregation in South Carolina, 1963-1970

IF 0.6 Q2 LAW AMERICAN JOURNAL OF LEGAL HISTORY Pub Date : 2020-06-01 DOI:10.1093/ajlh/njaa003
S. Lowe
{"title":"White Subversion of Public School Desegregation in South Carolina, 1963-1970","authors":"S. Lowe","doi":"10.1093/ajlh/njaa003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Despite small victories for black South Carolinians in desegregating Clemson College and the University of South Carolina in 1963, federal court cases dealing with public education in the mid- to late 1960s reveal that South Carolina officials were willing to go to great lengths to preserve segregation. 1963 as a turning point on South Carolina’s desegregation history should be reconsidered. The state had no lack of white politicians, bureaucrats, and parents who continued to appeal to the courts to undermine the transformative intent of Brown v. Board. Despite some minor steps toward desegregation—small steps that whites were willing to allow as long as they helped to forestall any real integration—white South Carolinians were able, through legal delay and obfuscation, to subvert the promise of “integration with dignity.” Ultimately, policy-related efforts failed and by the early 1970s, desegregation had become a reality. However, personal defiance successfully thwarted integration, leading some white parents to permanently quit the public school system.","PeriodicalId":54164,"journal":{"name":"AMERICAN JOURNAL OF LEGAL HISTORY","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AMERICAN JOURNAL OF LEGAL HISTORY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ajlh/njaa003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite small victories for black South Carolinians in desegregating Clemson College and the University of South Carolina in 1963, federal court cases dealing with public education in the mid- to late 1960s reveal that South Carolina officials were willing to go to great lengths to preserve segregation. 1963 as a turning point on South Carolina’s desegregation history should be reconsidered. The state had no lack of white politicians, bureaucrats, and parents who continued to appeal to the courts to undermine the transformative intent of Brown v. Board. Despite some minor steps toward desegregation—small steps that whites were willing to allow as long as they helped to forestall any real integration—white South Carolinians were able, through legal delay and obfuscation, to subvert the promise of “integration with dignity.” Ultimately, policy-related efforts failed and by the early 1970s, desegregation had become a reality. However, personal defiance successfully thwarted integration, leading some white parents to permanently quit the public school system.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
1963-1970年南卡罗来纳州白人对公立学校废除种族隔离的颠覆
尽管南卡罗莱纳黑人在1963年废除克莱姆森学院和南卡罗莱纳大学的种族隔离中取得了小小的胜利,但在20世纪60年代中后期处理公共教育的联邦法院案件表明,南卡罗莱纳官员愿意竭尽全力维护种族隔离。1963年作为南卡罗来纳州废除种族隔离历史的转折点应该被重新考虑。该州不乏白人政客、官僚和家长,他们继续向法院上诉,以破坏布朗诉董事会案的变革意图。尽管在废除种族隔离方面采取了一些小步骤——只要这些小步骤有助于阻止任何真正的种族融合,白人都愿意允许——但南卡罗来纳州的白人能够通过法律上的拖延和混淆,颠覆“有尊严的种族融合”的承诺。最终,与政策相关的努力失败了,到20世纪70年代初,废除种族隔离已经成为现实。然而,个人的反抗成功地阻碍了种族融合,导致一些白人父母永久地退出了公立学校体系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Legal History was established in 1957 as the first English-language legal history journal. The journal remains devoted to the publication of articles and documents on the history of all legal systems. The journal is refereed, and members of the Judiciary and the Bar form the advisory board.
期刊最新文献
Letter Writing and Legal Consciousness during World War I Exemplary Damages Practice in Late Eighteenth and Early Nineteenth-Century England Alexander Hamilton's Constitutional Jurisprudence and the Bank Bill The Early Years of Congress’s Anti-Removal Power Movement on Removal: An Emerging Consensus about The First Congress and Presidential Power
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1