Quality indicators in colonoscopy: observational study in a supplementary health system.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Acta cirurgica brasileira Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1590/acb371106
Rogerio Kuga, Marcio Roberto Facanali Junior, Everson Luiz de Almeida Artifon
{"title":"Quality indicators in colonoscopy: observational study in a supplementary health system.","authors":"Rogerio Kuga,&nbsp;Marcio Roberto Facanali Junior,&nbsp;Everson Luiz de Almeida Artifon","doi":"10.1590/acb371106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Colorectal cancer is responsible for 9.4% of cancer deaths, and low polyp detection rate and cecal intubation rate increase the risks of interval colorectal cancer. Despite several population studies that address colonoscopy quality measures, there is still a shortage of these studies in Latin America. The aim of this study was to assess quality indicators in colonoscopy, enabling future strategies to improve colorectal cancer prevention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An observational retrospective study, in which all colonoscopies performed in 11 hospitals were evaluated through a review of medical records. Information such as procedure indication, colorectal polyp detection rate, cecal intubation rate, quality of colonic preparation, and immediate adverse events were collected and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 17,448 colonoscopies performed by 86 endoscopists, 57.9% were in patients aged 50 to 74 years old. Colon preparation was adequate in 94.4% procedures, with rates of cecal intubation and polyp detection of 94 and 36.6%, respectively. Acute adverse events occurred in 0.2%. In 53.9%, high-definition imaging equipment was used. The procedure location, colon preparation and high-definition equipment influenced polyp detection rates (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The extraction and analysis of electronic medical records showed that there are opportunities for improvement in colonoscopy quality indicators in the participating hospitals.</p>","PeriodicalId":6992,"journal":{"name":"Acta cirurgica brasileira","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9829243/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta cirurgica brasileira","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/acb371106","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: Colorectal cancer is responsible for 9.4% of cancer deaths, and low polyp detection rate and cecal intubation rate increase the risks of interval colorectal cancer. Despite several population studies that address colonoscopy quality measures, there is still a shortage of these studies in Latin America. The aim of this study was to assess quality indicators in colonoscopy, enabling future strategies to improve colorectal cancer prevention.

Methods: An observational retrospective study, in which all colonoscopies performed in 11 hospitals were evaluated through a review of medical records. Information such as procedure indication, colorectal polyp detection rate, cecal intubation rate, quality of colonic preparation, and immediate adverse events were collected and analyzed.

Results: In 17,448 colonoscopies performed by 86 endoscopists, 57.9% were in patients aged 50 to 74 years old. Colon preparation was adequate in 94.4% procedures, with rates of cecal intubation and polyp detection of 94 and 36.6%, respectively. Acute adverse events occurred in 0.2%. In 53.9%, high-definition imaging equipment was used. The procedure location, colon preparation and high-definition equipment influenced polyp detection rates (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: The extraction and analysis of electronic medical records showed that there are opportunities for improvement in colonoscopy quality indicators in the participating hospitals.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
结肠镜检查的质量指标:辅助卫生系统的观察性研究。
目的:结直肠癌占癌症死亡的9.4%,低息肉检出率和盲肠插管率增加了间期结直肠癌的发生风险。尽管有几项人口研究涉及结肠镜检查质量措施,但拉丁美洲仍然缺乏这些研究。本研究的目的是评估结肠镜检查的质量指标,为未来改善结直肠癌预防提供策略。方法:对11家医院的结肠镜检查病例进行回顾性分析。收集并分析手术适应证、结肠息肉检出率、盲肠插管率、结肠准备质量和即时不良事件等信息。结果:86名内镜医师进行的17448例结肠镜检查中,57.9%的患者年龄在50 ~ 74岁之间。在94.4%的手术中,结肠准备是充分的,盲肠插管和息肉检出率分别为94%和36.6%。急性不良事件发生率为0.2%。53.9%的患者使用高清成像设备。手术位置、结肠准备和高清设备影响息肉检出率(p < 0.001)。结论:通过对电子病历的提取和分析,参与医院结肠镜检查质量指标有提高的空间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
60
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
Tridimensional models and radiographic study of dorsal laminectomy and thoracolumbar hemilaminectomy in dogs. Pancreatic cancer orthotopic graft in a murine model. ERRATA. Protective effect of Guanxin Danshen formula on myocardial ischemiareperfusion injury in rats. Astragaloside IV alleviates stroke-triggered early brain injury by modulating neuroinflammation and ferroptosis via the Nrf2/HO-1 signaling pathway.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1