Critical Analysis of Application of Article 303 BIS Paragraph (1) to 1 of The Criminal Code in Accessible Cases Online Gambling

Ni Made Anjani Dwi Maharani, Somawijaya Somawijaya, A. Ramdan
{"title":"Critical Analysis of Application of Article 303 BIS Paragraph (1) to 1 of The Criminal Code in Accessible Cases Online Gambling","authors":"Ni Made Anjani Dwi Maharani, Somawijaya Somawijaya, A. Ramdan","doi":"10.15294/pandecta.v17i2.29353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Gambling in Indonesia is distinguished into two, ordinary gambling regulated in the Criminal Code and online gambling as stipulated in Law No. 11 of 2008 on Information and Electronic Transactions. Defendant Aan alias Andi committed a crime of online gambling by the way the defendant became an online gambling agent and the defendant was tasked with sharing the access code namely password and ID to the players who wanted to become members of the defendant’s online gambling. The defendant will benefit from the players using the defendant’s access code. The problem that the researchers reviewed relates to the application of Article 303 bis paragraph (1) to 1 of the Criminal Code by the judge on criminal acts making accessible gambling content carried out by defendant Aan alias Andi. Writing these laws using methods approach juridical normative that focused on research on data library. The specification of research that used a descriptive analytical, namely give a description data and carefully as completely as possible about the object of the problem as the result of the study library various literature, legislation, and other ingredients that deals with discussion at in writing the study case. Based on the results of the research, it is known that: First, the judge decided that the defendant Aan namely Andi used Article 303 bis paragraph (1) to 1 of the Criminal Code which was inappropriate because in Article 303 bis paragraph (1) to 1 of the Criminal Code there was no element of making gambling content accessible and making gambling content accessible has been specifically regulated in Article 27 paragraph (2) of the ITE Law. Second, Decision Number 184/Pid.B/2018/PN.Btm does not reflect the objectives of the law, namely justice, certainty and expediency which will have an impact on the weakness of the law enforcement process for the crime of gambling due to the low sentence given by the panel of judges.","PeriodicalId":30516,"journal":{"name":"Pandecta Research Law Journal","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pandecta Research Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15294/pandecta.v17i2.29353","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Gambling in Indonesia is distinguished into two, ordinary gambling regulated in the Criminal Code and online gambling as stipulated in Law No. 11 of 2008 on Information and Electronic Transactions. Defendant Aan alias Andi committed a crime of online gambling by the way the defendant became an online gambling agent and the defendant was tasked with sharing the access code namely password and ID to the players who wanted to become members of the defendant’s online gambling. The defendant will benefit from the players using the defendant’s access code. The problem that the researchers reviewed relates to the application of Article 303 bis paragraph (1) to 1 of the Criminal Code by the judge on criminal acts making accessible gambling content carried out by defendant Aan alias Andi. Writing these laws using methods approach juridical normative that focused on research on data library. The specification of research that used a descriptive analytical, namely give a description data and carefully as completely as possible about the object of the problem as the result of the study library various literature, legislation, and other ingredients that deals with discussion at in writing the study case. Based on the results of the research, it is known that: First, the judge decided that the defendant Aan namely Andi used Article 303 bis paragraph (1) to 1 of the Criminal Code which was inappropriate because in Article 303 bis paragraph (1) to 1 of the Criminal Code there was no element of making gambling content accessible and making gambling content accessible has been specifically regulated in Article 27 paragraph (2) of the ITE Law. Second, Decision Number 184/Pid.B/2018/PN.Btm does not reflect the objectives of the law, namely justice, certainty and expediency which will have an impact on the weakness of the law enforcement process for the crime of gambling due to the low sentence given by the panel of judges.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《刑法》第三百零三条第一款第一项适用于网络赌博无障碍案件的批判性分析
印度尼西亚的赌博分为两种,刑法规定的普通赌博和2008年关于信息和电子交易的第11号法律规定的在线赌博。被告化名安迪,通过成为网上赌博代理人的方式,犯了网上赌博罪,而被告的任务是向想要成为被告网上赌博成员的玩家分享登入代码,即密码和ID。被告将受益于玩家使用被告的访问码。研究人员审查的问题涉及法官对《刑法》第303条之二第(1)款第1项的适用,适用于被告人化名安迪进行的使赌博内容易于获取的犯罪行为。以数据库研究为重点,采用接近司法规范的方法编写这些法律。该研究的说明使用了描述性分析,即给出一个描述数据,并尽可能仔细完整地描述问题的对象,作为研究图书馆的各种文献,立法和其他成分的结果,在撰写研究案例时处理讨论。根据研究结果可知:首先,法官认为被告人安即安迪使用刑法第303条第1款至第1款是不适当的,因为刑法第303条第1款至第1款中没有赌博内容可及性的要素,而赌博内容可及性在刑法第27条第2款中有具体规定。第二,第184/Pid.B/2018/PN号决定。Btm没有反映法律的目标,即正义、确定性和权宜性,这将对由于法官小组的低量刑而导致的赌博犯罪执法过程的薄弱产生影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Implementation of Criminal Law to Determine Persons of Environmental Pollution and/or Destruction in Court Covid-19 Pandemic as Force Majeure Unable to Fulfill Obligation in Financing Agreement Social Engineering to Overcome Conflict Between People’s Markets and Supermarkets in Kulon Progo Regency (Review of Regional Regulation No. 16 of 2021) Reposition of the Promulgation for Indonesian Legislation Qualification of Child Status from Unregistered Polygamous Marriage without Marriage Validation (Study of Religious Court Decisions from 2019-2022)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1