Medical students' coping with stress and its predictors: a cross-sectional study.

IF 1.6 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES International Journal of Medical Education Pub Date : 2023-02-28 DOI:10.5116/ijme.63de.3840
Julia Cummerow, Katrin Obst, Edgar Voltmer, Thomas Kötter
{"title":"Medical students' coping with stress and its predictors: a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Julia Cummerow, Katrin Obst, Edgar Voltmer, Thomas Kötter","doi":"10.5116/ijme.63de.3840","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To analyse stress coping styles of medical students at different time points of medical education and to identify predictors of functional coping.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted among medical students (N = 497, 361 women and 136 men) before year one (n = 141), after year one (n = 135) and after year five (n = 220). Students answered the Brief Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced Inventory, the Work-Related Behaviour and Experience Patterns, the Perceived Medical School Stress Instrument and the Maslach Burnout Inventory. Multiple regression was used to examine factors associated with functional coping.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Single factor ANOVA indicated a significant difference for functional coping between the time points (F <sub>(2, 494)</sub> = 9.52, p < .01), with fifth-year students scoring significantly higher than students before or after year one. There was a significant difference in dysfunctional coping (F <sub>(2, 494)</sub> = 12.37, p < .01), with students before year one and after year five scoring higher than those after year one. Efficacy (β = 0.15, t <sub>(213)</sub> = 4.66, p < .01), emotional distancing (β = 0.04, t <sub>(213)</sub> = 3.50, p < .01) and satisfaction with life (β = 0.06, t <sub>(213)</sub> = 4.87, p < .01) were positive predictors of functional coping.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Scores for both functional and dysfunctional coping vary during medical education. The reasons for low coping scores after year one require further explanation. These findings represent a starting point for investigations into how to promote functional coping during early medical education.</p>","PeriodicalId":14029,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Education","volume":"14 ","pages":"11-18"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10693402/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.63de.3840","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To analyse stress coping styles of medical students at different time points of medical education and to identify predictors of functional coping.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among medical students (N = 497, 361 women and 136 men) before year one (n = 141), after year one (n = 135) and after year five (n = 220). Students answered the Brief Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced Inventory, the Work-Related Behaviour and Experience Patterns, the Perceived Medical School Stress Instrument and the Maslach Burnout Inventory. Multiple regression was used to examine factors associated with functional coping.

Results: Single factor ANOVA indicated a significant difference for functional coping between the time points (F (2, 494) = 9.52, p < .01), with fifth-year students scoring significantly higher than students before or after year one. There was a significant difference in dysfunctional coping (F (2, 494) = 12.37, p < .01), with students before year one and after year five scoring higher than those after year one. Efficacy (β = 0.15, t (213) = 4.66, p < .01), emotional distancing (β = 0.04, t (213) = 3.50, p < .01) and satisfaction with life (β = 0.06, t (213) = 4.87, p < .01) were positive predictors of functional coping.

Conclusions: Scores for both functional and dysfunctional coping vary during medical education. The reasons for low coping scores after year one require further explanation. These findings represent a starting point for investigations into how to promote functional coping during early medical education.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医学生应对压力及其预测因素的横断面研究
目的:分析医学生在医学教育不同时间点的压力应对方式,并探讨其功能应对的预测因素。方法:对医学生进行横断面研究(N = 497,361名女性和136名男性),第一年(N = 141),一年后(N = 135)和五年后(N = 220)。学生回答了“问题经验量表”、“工作行为与经验模式”、“医学院压力感知量表”和“马斯拉克职业倦怠量表”的简短应对倾向。采用多元回归方法分析与功能性应对相关的因素。结果:单因素方差分析显示,各时间点的功能应对差异有统计学意义(F (2,494) = 9.52, p < 0.01),五年级学生的得分显著高于一年级前后的学生。在功能障碍应对方面存在显著性差异(F (2,494) = 12.37, p < 0.01),一年级前和五年级后得分均高于一年级后。效能(β = 0.15, t (213) = 4.66, p < 0.01)、情绪距离(β = 0.04, t (213) = 3.50, p < 0.01)和生活满意度(β = 0.06, t (213) = 4.87, p < 0.01)是功能性应对的正向预测因子。结论:在医学教育过程中,功能应对和功能失调应对的得分存在差异。一年后应对得分低的原因需要进一步解释。这些发现为探讨如何在早期医学教育中促进功能性应对提供了一个起点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Medical Education
International Journal of Medical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
38
期刊最新文献
How do mentors perceive and perform their role in a reflection-based mentoring programme for medical students? Enhancing the learning experience by empowering medical students to co-create learning tools and classroom activities. Profiles of intercultural sensitivity of healthcare students: a person-centred approach. Effectively supporting widening participation learners in medical education through a capability approach lens. Exploring a metacognitive approach for case analysis based learning of anxiety adjustment in nurses: a qualitative study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1