Overview of case definitions and contact tracing indications in the 2022 monkeypox outbreak.

Q2 Medicine Infezioni in Medicina Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.53854/liim-3101-3
Giovanni Guarducci, Barbara Rita Porchia, Carlotta Lorenzini, Nicola Nante
{"title":"Overview of case definitions and contact tracing indications in the 2022 monkeypox outbreak.","authors":"Giovanni Guarducci,&nbsp;Barbara Rita Porchia,&nbsp;Carlotta Lorenzini,&nbsp;Nicola Nante","doi":"10.53854/liim-3101-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In 2022, a new outbreak of the Mpox virus occurred outside of Africa, its usual endemic area. The virus was detected in European, American, Asian, and Oceanian countries where Mpox is uncommon or had not been reported previously and where the spread was rapid. The study aims to compare the case definition and the indications for contact tracing in case of Mpox infection among the World Health Organization (WHO), the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC), and four European Countries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From August 2022 to November 2022, we conducted research, first on the WHO and ECDC official websites and then on the official websites of the Ministry of Health or National Health Agencies of four European Countries (Italy, France, Spain, and Portugal). All reports found were compared to enlighten the differences in the definition of the case and indications for contact tracing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The WHO divides the case definition into four categories: suspected, probable, confirmed, and discarded, while the ECDC divides cases into confirmed and probable. The ECDC defines contact as close and others, while the WHO divides it into high, medium, and minimal risk. The four countries analyzed show heterogeneity in both the case definitions and the indications for contact tracing.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our analysis revealed heterogeneity in the case definition between the WHO and ECDC. Different countries followed different indications or have given their indications for both the case definition and contact tracing indications. Harmonization strengthens public health preparedness and response and creates unified communication.</p>","PeriodicalId":52423,"journal":{"name":"Infezioni in Medicina","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9994831/pdf/1124-9390_31_1_2023_013-019.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infezioni in Medicina","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53854/liim-3101-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: In 2022, a new outbreak of the Mpox virus occurred outside of Africa, its usual endemic area. The virus was detected in European, American, Asian, and Oceanian countries where Mpox is uncommon or had not been reported previously and where the spread was rapid. The study aims to compare the case definition and the indications for contact tracing in case of Mpox infection among the World Health Organization (WHO), the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC), and four European Countries.

Methods: From August 2022 to November 2022, we conducted research, first on the WHO and ECDC official websites and then on the official websites of the Ministry of Health or National Health Agencies of four European Countries (Italy, France, Spain, and Portugal). All reports found were compared to enlighten the differences in the definition of the case and indications for contact tracing.

Results: The WHO divides the case definition into four categories: suspected, probable, confirmed, and discarded, while the ECDC divides cases into confirmed and probable. The ECDC defines contact as close and others, while the WHO divides it into high, medium, and minimal risk. The four countries analyzed show heterogeneity in both the case definitions and the indications for contact tracing.

Conclusions: Our analysis revealed heterogeneity in the case definition between the WHO and ECDC. Different countries followed different indications or have given their indications for both the case definition and contact tracing indications. Harmonization strengthens public health preparedness and response and creates unified communication.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2022年猴痘暴发病例定义和接触者追踪指征概述。
背景:2022年,在其通常流行地区非洲以外发生了一次新的麻疹病毒暴发。该病毒是在欧洲、美洲、亚洲和大洋洲国家发现的,这些国家的麻疹不常见或以前没有报告过,而且传播迅速。该研究旨在比较世界卫生组织(世卫组织)、欧洲疾病预防和控制中心(ECDC)和四个欧洲国家之间的麻疹病例定义和接触者追踪指征。方法:从2022年8月至2022年11月,我们首先在WHO和ECDC的官方网站进行研究,然后在四个欧洲国家(意大利、法国、西班牙和葡萄牙)的卫生部或国家卫生机构的官方网站进行研究。对发现的所有报告进行了比较,以阐明病例定义和接触者追踪指征方面的差异。结果:WHO将病例定义分为疑似、可能、确诊和丢弃四类,ECDC将病例定义分为确诊和可能。ECDC将接触定义为“密切接触”和“其他接触”,而世卫组织将其分为高、中、低风险。所分析的四个国家在病例定义和接触者追踪指征方面均存在异质性。结论:我们的分析揭示了WHO和ECDC在病例定义上的异质性。不同国家遵循不同的指征,或对病例定义和接触者追踪指征都给出了自己的指征。协调加强了公共卫生准备和应对,并创造了统一的沟通。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Infezioni in Medicina
Infezioni in Medicina Medicine-Infectious Diseases
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
期刊介绍: The Journal publishes original papers, in Italian or in English, on topics concerning aetiopathogenesis, prevention, epidemiology, diagnosis, clinical features and therapy of infections, whose acceptance is subject to the referee’s assessment. The Journal is of interest not only to infectious disease specialists, microbiologists and pharmacologists, but also to internal medicine specialists, paediatricians, pneumologists, and to surgeons as well. The Editorial Board includes experts in each of the above mentioned fields.
期刊最新文献
The current state of knowledge on dracunculiasis: a narrative review of a rare neglected disease Historical account of clinical observations on leprosy and related manifestations in the Comacchio area, Italy, in the XIX century Clinical utility of intrabronchial antifungal instillation in a complicated case of chronic pulmonary aspergillosis: case report and systematic review of literature Did the updated Duke criteria missed Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae from the list of typical microorganisms causing infective endocarditis? The role of long-acting antibiotics in the clinical practice: a narrative review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1