Is there a role for controlled repositioning and mini-open primary osteoplasty in the management of unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis?

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Hip Preservation Surgery Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1093/jhps/hnac037
K Venkatadass, V Durga Prasad, Deepak Jain, Nasser Mohammed Mansor Al Ahmadi, S Rajasekaran
{"title":"Is there a role for controlled repositioning and mini-open primary osteoplasty in the management of unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis?","authors":"K Venkatadass,&nbsp;V Durga Prasad,&nbsp;Deepak Jain,&nbsp;Nasser Mohammed Mansor Al Ahmadi,&nbsp;S Rajasekaran","doi":"10.1093/jhps/hnac037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The management of unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis is controversial with variable rates of avascular necrosis (AVN). Treatment options include <i>in-situ</i> stabilization, gentle/positional reduction and screw fixation and modified Dunn's procedure (MDP). We present a technique of controlled repositioning (CRP) of the epiphysis to pre-acute slip stage, screw fixation and primary osteoplasty. Between 2015 and 2020, 38 unstable slips were treated in our institution. Of these, 14 underwent successful CRP and the rest were treated with MDP. All the 14 patients who had CRP and completed 1-year follow-up were included for this study. The head-neck angle (HNA) was measured at presentation and alpha angle, head-neck offset and AVN were assessed during follow-up. The average age was 14 years (9-18) and mean follow-up was 17.7 months (12-43). The average intraoperative flexion internal rotation before osteoplasty was -18.5° (-40° to -5°) which improved to +22.1° (+15° to +30°). The average preoperative HNA was 48.7° (34.1° to 70.7°) which improved to 18.4° (1.8° to 35.7°) post-operatively. At final follow-up, the average alpha angle and head-neck offset were 46.4° (30.9° to 64.6°) and 0.22 (0.09 to 0.96), respectively. The AVN rate in the CRP group was 7.1% compared with 20.8% in the MDP group, which was not significant (<i>P</i> = 0.383). Two patients had screw breakage. CRP, screw fixation and mini-open primary osteoplasty is a feasible treatment option in a subgroup of patients with unstable SCFEs. The limitation with this technique is that the final decision is made intraoperatively, and hence the patient and parents need to be counselled and consented appropriately. <i>Level of evidence</i>: Level IV-Case series.</p>","PeriodicalId":48583,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hip Preservation Surgery","volume":"9 4","pages":"211-218"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/7c/10/hnac037.PMC9993448.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hip Preservation Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jhps/hnac037","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The management of unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis is controversial with variable rates of avascular necrosis (AVN). Treatment options include in-situ stabilization, gentle/positional reduction and screw fixation and modified Dunn's procedure (MDP). We present a technique of controlled repositioning (CRP) of the epiphysis to pre-acute slip stage, screw fixation and primary osteoplasty. Between 2015 and 2020, 38 unstable slips were treated in our institution. Of these, 14 underwent successful CRP and the rest were treated with MDP. All the 14 patients who had CRP and completed 1-year follow-up were included for this study. The head-neck angle (HNA) was measured at presentation and alpha angle, head-neck offset and AVN were assessed during follow-up. The average age was 14 years (9-18) and mean follow-up was 17.7 months (12-43). The average intraoperative flexion internal rotation before osteoplasty was -18.5° (-40° to -5°) which improved to +22.1° (+15° to +30°). The average preoperative HNA was 48.7° (34.1° to 70.7°) which improved to 18.4° (1.8° to 35.7°) post-operatively. At final follow-up, the average alpha angle and head-neck offset were 46.4° (30.9° to 64.6°) and 0.22 (0.09 to 0.96), respectively. The AVN rate in the CRP group was 7.1% compared with 20.8% in the MDP group, which was not significant (P = 0.383). Two patients had screw breakage. CRP, screw fixation and mini-open primary osteoplasty is a feasible treatment option in a subgroup of patients with unstable SCFEs. The limitation with this technique is that the final decision is made intraoperatively, and hence the patient and parents need to be counselled and consented appropriately. Level of evidence: Level IV-Case series.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在不稳定股骨干骨骺滑脱的治疗中,控制复位和小开口初次成形术是否有作用?
不稳定的股骨头骨骺滑动的处理与不同的缺血性坏死(AVN)率是有争议的。治疗方案包括原位稳定、温和复位、螺钉固定和改良的Dunn手术(MDP)。我们提出了一种控制骨骺复位(CRP)到急性滑脱期前,螺钉固定和初级骨成形术的技术。2015年至2020年,我院共收治不稳定卡瓦38例。其中14例成功接受CRP治疗,其余患者接受MDP治疗。本研究纳入了所有14例CRP患者并完成了1年随访。入院时测量头颈角(HNA),随访时评估α角、头颈偏移和AVN。平均年龄14岁(9 ~ 18岁),平均随访17.7个月(12 ~ 43岁)。成形术前平均术中屈曲内旋为-18.5°(-40°至-5°),改善至+22.1°(+15°至+30°)。术前平均HNA为48.7°(34.1°~ 70.7°),术后平均HNA为18.4°(1.8°~ 35.7°)。最终随访时,alpha角和头颈偏移的平均值分别为46.4°(30.9°~ 64.6°)和0.22°(0.09 ~ 0.96)。CRP组AVN发生率为7.1%,而MDP组为20.8%,差异无统计学意义(P = 0.383)。2例患者螺钉断裂。对于不稳定scfe患者亚组,CRP、螺钉固定和小开口一期骨成形术是一种可行的治疗选择。这种技术的局限性在于最终的决定是在术中做出的,因此患者和家长需要得到适当的咨询和同意。证据等级:四级-案例系列。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
20.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Levels of evidence. What the papers say. A growing role for Registry data to guide discussions with patients on their treatment options. What The Papers Say. Clinical and surgical factors influencing screw breakage during hardware removal following periacetabular osteotomy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1