Analysis of students with the wrong major based on the metacognitive dimension

S. Suharno, Fudiana Lailaturrohmah, P. Purwanto, R. Ranto, M. Akhyar
{"title":"Analysis of students with the wrong major based on the metacognitive dimension","authors":"S. Suharno, Fudiana Lailaturrohmah, P. Purwanto, R. Ranto, M. Akhyar","doi":"10.21831/jptk.v29i1.53642","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Precisely, students with the wrong major faced several conflicts such as academics. To improve education quality, it is necessary to develop metacognitive skills because the level is still in the risk category. Therefore, this study aims to analyze (1) the percentage of students with the wrong major (2) the impact and factors that cause children to select the wrong majors (3) students' learning activities with the wrong major. The design is descriptive and quantitative with questionnaires distributed in three batches. Furthermore, the test was carried out using proportional stratified random sampling. Data were collected through questionnaires and interviews. The validity test was performed using the product moment method from Karl Person. Moreover, data were analyzed by employing factors and descriptive statistical techniques. The results showed that; First, 59% and 41% of students agree and refused they are in the wrong major. Second, the influencing factors include seeking opportunities to enter college, degree demand in the work context, parental coercion, study program profiles, and job prospects. However, the most influencing factor is seeking opportunities to enter college. Third, the wrong study program causes students to feel inferior to others. Fourth, there is a negative influence of the wrong major on metacognitive, particularly in planning development where children have difficulty managing time to achieve their goals.","PeriodicalId":55675,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi dan Kejuruan","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi dan Kejuruan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21831/jptk.v29i1.53642","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Precisely, students with the wrong major faced several conflicts such as academics. To improve education quality, it is necessary to develop metacognitive skills because the level is still in the risk category. Therefore, this study aims to analyze (1) the percentage of students with the wrong major (2) the impact and factors that cause children to select the wrong majors (3) students' learning activities with the wrong major. The design is descriptive and quantitative with questionnaires distributed in three batches. Furthermore, the test was carried out using proportional stratified random sampling. Data were collected through questionnaires and interviews. The validity test was performed using the product moment method from Karl Person. Moreover, data were analyzed by employing factors and descriptive statistical techniques. The results showed that; First, 59% and 41% of students agree and refused they are in the wrong major. Second, the influencing factors include seeking opportunities to enter college, degree demand in the work context, parental coercion, study program profiles, and job prospects. However, the most influencing factor is seeking opportunities to enter college. Third, the wrong study program causes students to feel inferior to others. Fourth, there is a negative influence of the wrong major on metacognitive, particularly in planning development where children have difficulty managing time to achieve their goals.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于元认知维度的学生错专业分析
准确地说,选错专业的学生面临着学术等方面的矛盾。为了提高教育质量,元认知技能的发展是必要的,因为其水平仍处于危险类别。因此,本研究旨在分析(1)学生选错专业的比例(2)导致孩子选错专业的影响和因素(3)学生选错专业的学习活动。本研究采用描述性和定量设计,问卷分三批发放。此外,试验采用比例分层随机抽样。通过问卷调查和访谈收集数据。效度检验采用卡尔·珀森的积矩法。此外,采用因子和描述性统计技术对数据进行分析。结果表明:;首先,分别有59%和41%的学生认为自己选错了专业。其次,影响因素包括大学入学机会、工作环境中的学位需求、父母强迫、学习项目概况和就业前景。然而,最重要的影响因素是寻求进入大学的机会。第三,错误的学习计划使学生感到自卑。第四,错误的专业对元认知有负面影响,特别是在规划发展方面,孩子们很难管理时间来实现他们的目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of the program for modeling and implementation of a virtual laboratory for solid-state electronics The effect of peer lesson strategy on learning outcomes of building construction and land measurement techniques Penerapan Problem Based Learning dengan Menerapkan Teknik Windows Shopping untuk Meningkatkan Motivasi Belajar Peningkatan Partisipasi dan Penguasaan Vocabulary Siswa Kelas VII A SMP 1 Kabat Menggunakan Media Flashcard Pengelompokan Gaya Belajar Secara Homogen dalam Mendukung Pembelajaran Diferensiasi Proses Siswa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1