Lung and diaphragm ultrasound in noninvasive respiratory support: A real tool or fashion?

IF 0.7 Q4 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Tuberkuloz ve Toraks-Tuberculosis and Thorax Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.5578/tt.20239902
Domenica Di Costanzo, Mariano Mazza, Paolo Ruggeri, Jacobo Bacariza Blanco, Bushra Mina, Giuseppe Fiorentino, Biljana Lazovic, Gaetano Scaramuzzo, Antonio Esquinas
{"title":"Lung and diaphragm ultrasound in noninvasive respiratory support: A real tool or fashion?","authors":"Domenica Di Costanzo, Mariano Mazza, Paolo Ruggeri, Jacobo Bacariza Blanco, Bushra Mina, Giuseppe Fiorentino, Biljana Lazovic, Gaetano Scaramuzzo, Antonio Esquinas","doi":"10.5578/tt.20239902","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Over the past few years, there has been an increase in lung and diaphragm ultrasound applications as a tool to evaluate the outcomes and settings of noninvasive respiratory supports. However, actual clinical practices in this field are yet to be known. The aim of this study was to investigate the current clinical utilization of ultrasound for noninvasive respiratory supports on an international level.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study employed an online survey consisting of 32 items, which was sent via email to intensivists, pulmonologists, emergency medicine physicians, and other specialists with expertise in using ultrasound and/or noninvasive respiratory supports.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>We collected 52 questionnaires. The ultrasound study of diaphragm dysfunction was well-known by the majority of respondents (57.7%). Diaphragm performance was used as a weaning failure predictor (48.5%), as a predictor of noninvasive ventilation failure (38.5%) and as a tool for the ventilator settings adjustment (30.8%). In patients with acute respiratory failure, 48.1% used ultrasound to assess the damaged lung area to set up ventilatory parameters, 34.6% to monitor it after noninvasive ventilation application, and 32.7% to match it with the ventilatory settings for adjustment purposes. When administering high flow nasal cannula - oxygen therapy, 42.3% of participants used ultrasound to evaluate lung involvement and assess flow parameters.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Lung and diaphragm ultrasound is an established clinical practice to evaluate noninvasive respiratory supports outcomes and settings. Further studies are needed to evaluate the educational aspects to increase confidence and indications for its use.</p>","PeriodicalId":45521,"journal":{"name":"Tuberkuloz ve Toraks-Tuberculosis and Thorax","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10795273/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tuberkuloz ve Toraks-Tuberculosis and Thorax","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5578/tt.20239902","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Over the past few years, there has been an increase in lung and diaphragm ultrasound applications as a tool to evaluate the outcomes and settings of noninvasive respiratory supports. However, actual clinical practices in this field are yet to be known. The aim of this study was to investigate the current clinical utilization of ultrasound for noninvasive respiratory supports on an international level.

Materials and methods: The study employed an online survey consisting of 32 items, which was sent via email to intensivists, pulmonologists, emergency medicine physicians, and other specialists with expertise in using ultrasound and/or noninvasive respiratory supports.

Result: We collected 52 questionnaires. The ultrasound study of diaphragm dysfunction was well-known by the majority of respondents (57.7%). Diaphragm performance was used as a weaning failure predictor (48.5%), as a predictor of noninvasive ventilation failure (38.5%) and as a tool for the ventilator settings adjustment (30.8%). In patients with acute respiratory failure, 48.1% used ultrasound to assess the damaged lung area to set up ventilatory parameters, 34.6% to monitor it after noninvasive ventilation application, and 32.7% to match it with the ventilatory settings for adjustment purposes. When administering high flow nasal cannula - oxygen therapy, 42.3% of participants used ultrasound to evaluate lung involvement and assess flow parameters.

Conclusions: Lung and diaphragm ultrasound is an established clinical practice to evaluate noninvasive respiratory supports outcomes and settings. Further studies are needed to evaluate the educational aspects to increase confidence and indications for its use.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
无创呼吸支持中的肺和膈肌超声:真正的工具还是时尚?
简介:在过去几年中,肺部和膈肌超声作为评估无创呼吸支持的结果和设置的一种工具的应用越来越多。然而,这一领域的实际临床实践尚不得而知。本研究的目的是在国际范围内调查无创呼吸支持超声的临床应用现状:本研究采用在线调查的方式,通过电子邮件向重症监护医生、肺科医生、急诊科医生以及其他在使用超声波和/或无创呼吸支持方面具有专长的专家发送了一份包含 32 个项目的调查问卷:我们共收集到 52 份问卷。大多数受访者(57.7%)都知道膈肌功能障碍的超声波研究。膈肌的表现被用作断奶失败的预测指标(48.5%)、无创通气失败的预测指标(38.5%)和调整呼吸机设置的工具(30.8%)。在急性呼吸衰竭患者中,48.1% 的患者使用超声波评估受损肺面积以设置通气参数,34.6% 的患者在使用无创通气后监测受损肺面积,32.7% 的患者将受损肺面积与通气设置相匹配以进行调整。在使用高流量鼻插管-氧气疗法时,42.3%的参与者使用超声波来评估肺部受累情况和流量参数:结论:肺部和横膈膜超声是评估无创呼吸支持结果和设置的一种成熟的临床实践。需要进一步研究评估教育方面的问题,以增强使用信心和适应症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
9.10%
发文量
43
期刊最新文献
A patient with widespread skin lesions presenting with massive pleural effusion. A perspective on the scope of videoconferencing-based telemedicine in respiratory diseases outpatient clinic. Analysis of one-year follow-up results and treatment costs of patients with PTE in a tertiary care center. Analysis of post-COVID symptoms and predisposing factors for chronic post-COVID syndrome. Characteristics of adverse reactions due to subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy applied between 2011-2021: Single center experience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1