Faculty Perceptions of a Seven-Year Accreditation Process

Ron W. Germaine, L. Spencer
{"title":"Faculty Perceptions of a Seven-Year Accreditation Process","authors":"Ron W. Germaine, L. Spencer","doi":"10.5325/JASSEINSTEFFE.6.1.0067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article describes the context, purpose, methodology, findings, and recommendations from a survey conducted over a seven-year period to identify faculty perceptions of an accreditation process. The survey using both closed and open-ended responses was administered annually to the same population in the Sanford College of Education. Findings show that faculty saw the accreditation process as good professional development, that it improved programs, and that it strengthened collaboration. Based on our findings, we offer recommendations to overcome barriers in the accreditation process and thus maximize the benefits of the process to faculty, programs and schools involved in the accreditation work.","PeriodicalId":56185,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Assessment and Institutional Effectiveness","volume":"61 1","pages":"67 - 98"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Assessment and Institutional Effectiveness","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/JASSEINSTEFFE.6.1.0067","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

This article describes the context, purpose, methodology, findings, and recommendations from a survey conducted over a seven-year period to identify faculty perceptions of an accreditation process. The survey using both closed and open-ended responses was administered annually to the same population in the Sanford College of Education. Findings show that faculty saw the accreditation process as good professional development, that it improved programs, and that it strengthened collaboration. Based on our findings, we offer recommendations to overcome barriers in the accreditation process and thus maximize the benefits of the process to faculty, programs and schools involved in the accreditation work.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教师对七年认证过程的看法
本文描述了背景、目的、方法、结果和建议,这些建议来自一项为期七年的调查,以确定教师对认证过程的看法。这项调查采用封闭式和开放式两种方式,每年对桑福德教育学院的同一群人进行调查。调查结果显示,教师们认为认证过程是良好的专业发展,它改善了课程,加强了合作。根据我们的调查结果,我们提出了一些建议,以克服认证过程中的障碍,从而最大限度地提高参与认证工作的教师、项目和学校的利益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal of Assessment and Institutional Effectiveness publishes scholarly work on the assessment of student learning at the course, program, institutional, and multi-institutional levels as well as more broadly focused scholarship on institutional effectiveness in relation to mission and emerging directions in higher education assessment. JAIE is the official publication of the New England Educational Assessment Network, established in 1995 and recognized as one of the leaders in supporting best practices and resources in educational assessment.
期刊最新文献
Another Silo Isn’t the Answer: A Collaborative Approach to Assessment “With the Kindness Shown to Me”: Assessing Remote Teaching and Learning Strategies in a Time of Pandemic Grades and Learning It’s a Matter of Trust: Why Grades Are Persona non Grata in Assessment Ungrading: Why Rating Students Undermines Learning (and What to Do Instead)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1