{"title":"“Anyone Who Inspects the World Around Him Is in Some Measure a Geographer”: Pasolinian Contributions to an Ecology of the Edges","authors":"L. Matthey","doi":"10.1080/2373566X.2021.1989321","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a 1947 paper, John K. Wright proposed the term “geosophy” to capture “the study of geographical knowledge from any or all points of view,” a discipline that would explore all “geographical ideas,” both “true and false.” This geosophy has led to a certain interest in parallel, imaginary or popular geographies. In the field of French-language geography, it will continue late in the day in a questioning of para-geographies produced by amateur or nonacademic geographers, rather close to certain Anglo-Saxon debates relating to popular geographies. His article attempts to reverse this point of view by turning these para-geographies into legitimate theories of space that are not recognized as such, as they are stated in a language other than that of science. It is a more poetic language, which resorts to allusion, implicit and imagery, whereas scientific writing prefers clarity, explicitness and factuality. As a result, these parallel geographies have not been elevated to the rank of a certain scientific dignity by the institution of geography and, more broadly, the sciences interested in the territory. I explore here some of Pier Paolo Pasolini’s productions by focusing on the geographical knowledge of which they are both the product and the vector. To do so, I mobilize literary and film materials from his oeuvre. If Pasolini was not a researcher, as defined by academia, he was at least someone who was searching. His work, which aimed at broadening reflection on the way society functions, with a view toward its spatial organization, might have contributed to geographic knowledge.","PeriodicalId":53217,"journal":{"name":"Geohumanities","volume":"26 1","pages":"177 - 196"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geohumanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2373566X.2021.1989321","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In a 1947 paper, John K. Wright proposed the term “geosophy” to capture “the study of geographical knowledge from any or all points of view,” a discipline that would explore all “geographical ideas,” both “true and false.” This geosophy has led to a certain interest in parallel, imaginary or popular geographies. In the field of French-language geography, it will continue late in the day in a questioning of para-geographies produced by amateur or nonacademic geographers, rather close to certain Anglo-Saxon debates relating to popular geographies. His article attempts to reverse this point of view by turning these para-geographies into legitimate theories of space that are not recognized as such, as they are stated in a language other than that of science. It is a more poetic language, which resorts to allusion, implicit and imagery, whereas scientific writing prefers clarity, explicitness and factuality. As a result, these parallel geographies have not been elevated to the rank of a certain scientific dignity by the institution of geography and, more broadly, the sciences interested in the territory. I explore here some of Pier Paolo Pasolini’s productions by focusing on the geographical knowledge of which they are both the product and the vector. To do so, I mobilize literary and film materials from his oeuvre. If Pasolini was not a researcher, as defined by academia, he was at least someone who was searching. His work, which aimed at broadening reflection on the way society functions, with a view toward its spatial organization, might have contributed to geographic knowledge.
在1947年的一篇论文中,约翰·k·赖特(John K. Wright)提出了“地理哲学”一词,以捕捉“从任何或所有角度研究地理知识的学科”,这门学科将探索所有“地理观念”,无论“真与假”。这种地理哲学导致了对平行、想象或流行地理的某种兴趣。在法语地理领域,今天晚些时候将继续对业余或非学术地理学家提出的准地理学提出质疑,这与某些与流行地理学有关的盎格鲁-撒克逊辩论相当接近。他的文章试图通过将这些准地理学转化为不被认可的合法空间理论来扭转这种观点,因为它们是用一种非科学的语言来陈述的。它是一种更诗意的语言,采用典故,含蓄和意象,而科学写作更喜欢清晰,明确和事实。因此,这些平行地理学并没有被地理学机构提升到某种科学尊严的地位,更广泛地说,对这一领域感兴趣的科学。我在这里探索一些皮埃尔·保罗·帕索里尼的作品,重点是地理知识,它们既是产品又是载体。为了做到这一点,我从他的作品中调动了文学和电影材料。如果帕索里尼不是学术界定义的研究人员,他至少是一个在探索的人。他的工作旨在扩大对社会运作方式的思考,并着眼于其空间组织,这可能对地理知识有所贡献。