Minority Rights in Ukraine After the Maidan Revolution: Change or Continuity?

A. Terzyan
{"title":"Minority Rights in Ukraine After the Maidan Revolution: Change or Continuity?","authors":"A. Terzyan","doi":"10.1515/openps-2022-0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper explores the state of minority rights in Ukraine following the 2014 Maidan revolution. The Maidan revolution has been largely regarded as the most radical attempt at de-institutionalizing post-Soviet politics and order since 1991 and forging a new Ukrainian nation. Such an endeavor leads us to address a critical question of what the core implications are on minority rights in Ukraine, which encompass religious, ethnic, and sexual minority rights. This analysis places special emphasis on minority religious rights in post-Maidan Ukraine. Findings suggest that the Maidan revolution has not led to substantial policy reform as it pertains to minorities, thus leaving many of their problems unaddressed. While the Maidan aided Ukraine in becoming more “Ukrainian” and reinforced the national identification of the Ukrainian population, it marked a considerable shift in nationalism by ensuing adverse effects on the Russian-speaking population in Eastern Ukraine, as well as on other ethnic and religious minority groups. Moreover, the Ukrainian authorities’ efforts at gaining “spiritual independence” from the Russian Orthodox Church have been met with challenges for religious minority groups. Despite the legislative measures aimed at protecting the rights of LGBTI community, their effective implementation remains a significant and unresolved problem.","PeriodicalId":91589,"journal":{"name":"Open journal of political science","volume":"61 1","pages":"1 - 12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open journal of political science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/openps-2022-0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This paper explores the state of minority rights in Ukraine following the 2014 Maidan revolution. The Maidan revolution has been largely regarded as the most radical attempt at de-institutionalizing post-Soviet politics and order since 1991 and forging a new Ukrainian nation. Such an endeavor leads us to address a critical question of what the core implications are on minority rights in Ukraine, which encompass religious, ethnic, and sexual minority rights. This analysis places special emphasis on minority religious rights in post-Maidan Ukraine. Findings suggest that the Maidan revolution has not led to substantial policy reform as it pertains to minorities, thus leaving many of their problems unaddressed. While the Maidan aided Ukraine in becoming more “Ukrainian” and reinforced the national identification of the Ukrainian population, it marked a considerable shift in nationalism by ensuing adverse effects on the Russian-speaking population in Eastern Ukraine, as well as on other ethnic and religious minority groups. Moreover, the Ukrainian authorities’ efforts at gaining “spiritual independence” from the Russian Orthodox Church have been met with challenges for religious minority groups. Despite the legislative measures aimed at protecting the rights of LGBTI community, their effective implementation remains a significant and unresolved problem.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
独立广场革命后乌克兰的少数民族权利:变化还是延续?
摘要本文探讨了2014年乌克兰独立广场革命后的少数民族权利状况。独立广场革命在很大程度上被视为自1991年以来将后苏联政治和秩序去制度化、打造一个新的乌克兰国家的最激进的尝试。这样的努力引导我们解决一个关键问题,即乌克兰少数群体权利的核心含义是什么,其中包括宗教,种族和性少数群体权利。这一分析特别强调了独立广场后乌克兰少数民族的宗教权利。调查结果表明,独立广场革命并没有导致实质性的政策改革,因为它涉及少数民族,因此使他们的许多问题得不到解决。虽然独立广场帮助乌克兰变得更加“乌克兰”,并加强了乌克兰人口的民族认同,但它对乌克兰东部讲俄语的人口以及其他种族和宗教少数群体产生了不利影响,标志着民族主义的重大转变。此外,乌克兰当局从俄罗斯东正教获得“精神独立”的努力也受到宗教少数群体的挑战。尽管立法措施旨在保护LGBTI群体的权利,但其有效实施仍然是一个重大而未解决的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Issue of Legitimacy of the Political Authority in Modern States Consensus and Climate Change The Civil and Political Rights in the Press Discourse of Britain’s Most Prominent News Websites Case Study: Just War Doctrine Make It or Break It with International Diplomacy: An Analysis of India and Nigeria’s Foreign Policy Pursuits
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1