Universal banking in the United States : what could we gain? What could we lose?

OUP Catalogue Pub Date : 1994-07-01 DOI:10.2307/1060155
A. Saunders, I. Walter
{"title":"Universal banking in the United States : what could we gain? What could we lose?","authors":"A. Saunders, I. Walter","doi":"10.2307/1060155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 1933 and 1956, the United States sharply limited the kinds of securities, commercial, and insurance activities banks could engage in. These regulations remain in place despite profound changes in the economic environment, in the structure of the national and international financial markets, and in technology. This book evaluates the case for and against eliminating these barriers. The authors study the consequences of bank regulation in the US as it relates to competition in international financial markets. They examine universal banking systems in other countries, especially Germany, Switzerland, and the UK, and how they work. They then apply the lessons to US banking, paying particular attention to the benchmarks of stability, equity, efficiency, and competitiveness against which the performance of national financial systems should be measured. They propose a level playing field on which any number of forms of organization can grow in the financial services sector, in which universal banking is one of the permitted structures, and where regulation is linked to function.","PeriodicalId":19574,"journal":{"name":"OUP Catalogue","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"241","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OUP Catalogue","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/1060155","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 241

Abstract

In 1933 and 1956, the United States sharply limited the kinds of securities, commercial, and insurance activities banks could engage in. These regulations remain in place despite profound changes in the economic environment, in the structure of the national and international financial markets, and in technology. This book evaluates the case for and against eliminating these barriers. The authors study the consequences of bank regulation in the US as it relates to competition in international financial markets. They examine universal banking systems in other countries, especially Germany, Switzerland, and the UK, and how they work. They then apply the lessons to US banking, paying particular attention to the benchmarks of stability, equity, efficiency, and competitiveness against which the performance of national financial systems should be measured. They propose a level playing field on which any number of forms of organization can grow in the financial services sector, in which universal banking is one of the permitted structures, and where regulation is linked to function.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国的全能银行:我们能得到什么?我们能失去什么呢?
在1933年和1956年,美国严格限制了银行可以从事的证券、商业和保险活动的种类。尽管经济环境、国内和国际金融市场结构以及技术发生了深刻变化,但这些规定仍然有效。这本书评估了支持和反对消除这些障碍的情况。两位作者研究了美国银行监管对国际金融市场竞争的影响。他们研究了其他国家的全能银行体系,尤其是德国、瑞士和英国,以及它们是如何运作的。然后,他们将这些经验教训应用于美国银行业,特别关注稳定性、公平性、效率和竞争力等基准,以衡量各国金融体系的表现。他们提出了一个公平的竞争环境,在这个环境中,任何形式的组织都可以在金融服务业中发展起来,其中,全能银行是允许的结构之一,监管与职能联系在一起。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Law of Reinsurance Fiscal Therapy Sinews of Power: Politics of the State Grid Corporation of China The Road Ahead for America's Colleges and Universities Family Background and University Success: Differences in Higher Education Access and Outcomes in England
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1