Risk Assessments of Aspartame, Acesulfame K, Sucralose and Benzoic Acid from Soft Drinks, “Saft”, Nectar and Flavoured Water

I. Steffensen, J. Alexander, M. Binderup, E. Bruzell, Knut Helkås Dahl, B. Granum, B. Herlofson, R. Hetland, T. Husøy, J. Paulsen, J. Rohloff, Vibeke Thrane, T. Wicklund
{"title":"Risk Assessments of Aspartame, Acesulfame K, Sucralose and Benzoic Acid from Soft Drinks, “Saft”, Nectar and Flavoured Water","authors":"I. Steffensen, J. Alexander, M. Binderup, E. Bruzell, Knut Helkås Dahl, B. Granum, B. Herlofson, R. Hetland, T. Husøy, J. Paulsen, J. Rohloff, Vibeke Thrane, T. Wicklund","doi":"10.9734/ejnfs/2020/v12i830265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food Safety (Vitenskapskomiteen for mattrygghet, VKM), Panel on Food Additives, Flavourings, Processing Aids, Materials in Contact with Food and Cosmetics, has at the request of the Norwegian Food Safety Authority (Mattilsynet) conducted a risk assessment of the intense sweeteners aspartame, acesulfame K and sucralose and the preservative benzoic acid from soft drinks, “saft”, nectar and flavoured water.  The risk assessment includes exposure assessments and the calculated exposures are compared to the acceptable daily intake (ADI) for the respective sweeteners and benzoic acid. VKM was also requested to compare the current calculated intake of aspartame, acesulfame K and benzoic acid to the calculated intake reported by VKM in 2007 (from the VKM report «Impact on health when sugar is replaced with intense sweeteners in soft drinks, «saft» and nectar») (VKM, 2007). \nExposure calculations were made for four different scenarios with varying concentrations of added sweeteners (either the average concentration or the highest reported concentration for the respective sweetener) and varying consumption of beverages with sweeteners (either the actual reported consumption of beverages added sweetener or the assumption that all reported beverages were added sweeteners). Scenario 1 gives the best estimate of the current situation in the population (average content  of sweeteners/benzoic acid, actual reported consumption), scenarios 2-4 is based on one or both of the following assumptions: only beverages added sweeteners are consumed, the beverages consumed are added the highest reported value of the sweeteners (scenario 2: average content of sweeteners/benzoic acid, all consumed beverages contain sweeteners; scenario 3: highest reported content of sweeteners/benzoic acid, actual reported consumption; scenario 4: highest reported content of sweeteners/benzoic acid, all consumed beverages contain sweeteners). \n  \nIn the current risk assessment, the intake of sweeteners and benzoic acid for two-year-old children and 18-70 year old men and women were calculated. Due to lack of new dietary surveys, the other age groups of children and adolescents were excluded. The estimated intake of aspartame, acesulfame K and sucralose was below the ADI for all age groups, both for mean and high consumers in all scenarios. When it comes to benzoic acid, the calculated mean and high intake for adults was below the ADI in all scenarios. The mean intake for 2year-olds was below ADI in all scenarios, as was the intake for high consumers among the 2year-olds in scenarios 1 and 2. However, high consumers among the two-year-old children in scenario 3 and 4 reached the ADI. \nDue to differences in the way the calculations were done in the current opinion and in 2007, it was not possible to compare the current calculated intake of aspartame, acesulfame K and benzoic acid to the calculated intakes reported by VKM in 2007. \nVKM concludes that for all age groups in all scenarios the intake of sweeteners is well below the established ADI values, thus, there is no concern related to the intake of the sweeteners aspartame, acesulfame K or sucralose. \nVKM further concludes that the benzoic acid intake in 2-year-old-children, in scenarios 3 and 4, is of concern as it reaches ADI for high consumers of soft drinks, “saft” and flavoured water, although the ADI is not a threshold for toxicity. For the other age groups, there is no concern related to the intake of benzoic acid from beverages. However, it should be noted that a considerable intake of benzoic acid also is expected from other sources such as food and cosmetics. High consumers of soft drinks, “saft” or flavoured water in all age groups could be at risk for approaching or exceeding ADI if the exposures from foods are taken into account. \nThis is especially of concern for 2-year-old children, since high consumers of soft drinks and “saft” already have reached the ADI. ","PeriodicalId":11994,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Nutrition & Food Safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Nutrition & Food Safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/ejnfs/2020/v12i830265","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food Safety (Vitenskapskomiteen for mattrygghet, VKM), Panel on Food Additives, Flavourings, Processing Aids, Materials in Contact with Food and Cosmetics, has at the request of the Norwegian Food Safety Authority (Mattilsynet) conducted a risk assessment of the intense sweeteners aspartame, acesulfame K and sucralose and the preservative benzoic acid from soft drinks, “saft”, nectar and flavoured water.  The risk assessment includes exposure assessments and the calculated exposures are compared to the acceptable daily intake (ADI) for the respective sweeteners and benzoic acid. VKM was also requested to compare the current calculated intake of aspartame, acesulfame K and benzoic acid to the calculated intake reported by VKM in 2007 (from the VKM report «Impact on health when sugar is replaced with intense sweeteners in soft drinks, «saft» and nectar») (VKM, 2007). Exposure calculations were made for four different scenarios with varying concentrations of added sweeteners (either the average concentration or the highest reported concentration for the respective sweetener) and varying consumption of beverages with sweeteners (either the actual reported consumption of beverages added sweetener or the assumption that all reported beverages were added sweeteners). Scenario 1 gives the best estimate of the current situation in the population (average content  of sweeteners/benzoic acid, actual reported consumption), scenarios 2-4 is based on one or both of the following assumptions: only beverages added sweeteners are consumed, the beverages consumed are added the highest reported value of the sweeteners (scenario 2: average content of sweeteners/benzoic acid, all consumed beverages contain sweeteners; scenario 3: highest reported content of sweeteners/benzoic acid, actual reported consumption; scenario 4: highest reported content of sweeteners/benzoic acid, all consumed beverages contain sweeteners).   In the current risk assessment, the intake of sweeteners and benzoic acid for two-year-old children and 18-70 year old men and women were calculated. Due to lack of new dietary surveys, the other age groups of children and adolescents were excluded. The estimated intake of aspartame, acesulfame K and sucralose was below the ADI for all age groups, both for mean and high consumers in all scenarios. When it comes to benzoic acid, the calculated mean and high intake for adults was below the ADI in all scenarios. The mean intake for 2year-olds was below ADI in all scenarios, as was the intake for high consumers among the 2year-olds in scenarios 1 and 2. However, high consumers among the two-year-old children in scenario 3 and 4 reached the ADI. Due to differences in the way the calculations were done in the current opinion and in 2007, it was not possible to compare the current calculated intake of aspartame, acesulfame K and benzoic acid to the calculated intakes reported by VKM in 2007. VKM concludes that for all age groups in all scenarios the intake of sweeteners is well below the established ADI values, thus, there is no concern related to the intake of the sweeteners aspartame, acesulfame K or sucralose. VKM further concludes that the benzoic acid intake in 2-year-old-children, in scenarios 3 and 4, is of concern as it reaches ADI for high consumers of soft drinks, “saft” and flavoured water, although the ADI is not a threshold for toxicity. For the other age groups, there is no concern related to the intake of benzoic acid from beverages. However, it should be noted that a considerable intake of benzoic acid also is expected from other sources such as food and cosmetics. High consumers of soft drinks, “saft” or flavoured water in all age groups could be at risk for approaching or exceeding ADI if the exposures from foods are taken into account. This is especially of concern for 2-year-old children, since high consumers of soft drinks and “saft” already have reached the ADI. 
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
含阿斯巴甜、安赛蜜K、三氯蔗糖及苯甲酸的软饮、" Saft "、花蜜及调味水的风险评估
应挪威食品安全局(Mattilsynet)的要求,挪威食品安全科学委员会(Vitenskapskomiteen for mattryghet, VKM),即食品添加剂、调味料、加工助剂、与食品和化妆品接触的材料小组,对来自软饮料、“saft”、花蜜和调味水的高强度甜味剂阿斯巴甜、安聚蜜K和三氯蔗糖以及防腐剂苯甲酸进行了风险评估。风险评估包括暴露评估,并将计算出的暴露量与各自甜味剂和苯甲酸的可接受日摄入量(ADI)进行比较。还请VKM将目前计算的阿斯巴甜、安赛蜜K和苯甲酸的摄入量与VKM在2007年报告的计算摄入量进行比较(来自VKM的报告《软饮料、“saft”和花蜜”中用强甜味剂代替糖对健康的影响》)(VKM, 2007年)。在四种不同的情况下进行了暴露计算,其中添加了不同浓度的甜味剂(每种甜味剂的平均浓度或最高报告浓度)和添加了甜味剂的饮料的不同消费量(添加了甜味剂的饮料的实际报告消费量或假设所有报告的饮料都添加了甜味剂)。情景1给出了对人口现状的最佳估计(甜味剂/苯甲酸的平均含量,实际报告的消费量),情景2-4基于以下一种或两种假设:只消费添加了甜味剂的饮料,消费的饮料添加了甜味剂的最高报告值(情景2:甜味剂/苯甲酸的平均含量,所有消费的饮料都含有甜味剂;情景3:甜味剂/苯甲酸的最高报告含量,实际报告用量;情景4:甜味剂/苯甲酸报告含量最高,所有消费的饮料都含有甜味剂)。在目前的风险评估中,计算了两岁儿童和18-70岁男性和女性的甜味剂和苯甲酸摄入量。由于缺乏新的饮食调查,其他年龄组的儿童和青少年被排除在外。所有年龄组的阿斯巴甜、安赛蜜K和三氯蔗糖的估计摄入量都低于建议摄入量,在所有情况下,无论是中等消费者还是高消费者。当涉及到苯甲酸时,计算出的成年人的平均和高摄入量在所有情况下都低于ADI。在所有情况下,2岁儿童的平均摄入量都低于每日推荐摄入量,在情况1和2中,高摄入量的2岁儿童的摄入量也是如此。然而,情景3和情景4中两岁儿童中的高消费者达到了建议摄入量。由于当前意见和2007年的计算方法不同,不可能将当前计算的阿斯巴甜、安赛蜜K和苯甲酸的摄入量与VKM在2007年报告的计算摄入量进行比较。VKM得出的结论是,在所有情况下,所有年龄组的甜味剂摄入量都远低于既定的每日推荐摄入量,因此,不存在与摄入阿斯巴甜、安赛蜜K或三氯蔗糖有关的问题。VKM进一步得出结论,在第三和第四种情况下,两岁儿童的苯甲酸摄入量值得关注,因为它达到了软饮料、“安全”和调味水的高消费者的推荐摄入量,尽管推荐摄入量不是毒性的阈值。对于其他年龄组,从饮料中摄入苯甲酸没有关系。然而,应该指出的是,大量苯甲酸的摄入也可能来自其他来源,如食品和化妆品。如果将来自食物的摄入考虑在内,所有年龄组的软饮料、“安全”或调味水的高摄入量消费者都可能面临接近或超过ADI的风险。这对2岁的孩子来说尤其值得关注,因为软饮料和“安全”的高消费者已经达到了建议摄入量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Essential Amino Acid Composition of Noodles Analogue from Aerial Yam, Rice and African Yam Bean Flour Blend Using Response Surface Methodology Hygienic Quality of Mbala-pinda, a Fermented Food Formulated from Local Products of Congo Occurrence of Virulent and Antibiotic Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Selected Ready-To-Eat Foods in Obio/Akpor, Rivers State, Nigeria Influence of Starch Content on the Sensory and Rheological Quality of Fermented Soy Milk Variability in Health Impact: Examining Lifestyle and Dietary Habits Across Different Stages of Adolescence: A Comprehensive Literature Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1