Reliability and Validity of the Persian Version of the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) Activity Scale in Candidates for Knee Replacement Surgery

Q3 Medicine JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION Pub Date : 2022-04-01 DOI:10.32598/rj.23.1.3429.1
Hadi Khoshrou, Neda Mostafaee, H. Negahban, Seyyed Javad Raeesi
{"title":"Reliability and Validity of the Persian Version of the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) Activity Scale in Candidates for Knee Replacement Surgery","authors":"Hadi Khoshrou, Neda Mostafaee, H. Negahban, Seyyed Javad Raeesi","doi":"10.32598/rj.23.1.3429.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This study aims to translate and cross-culturally adapt the University of California at Los Angles Activity Scale (UCLA) to Iranian samples and evaluate the reliability and validity of the Persian UCLA in candidates for knee replacement surgery. Materials & Methods: In this cross-sectional study, cross-cultural adaptation was performed according to the international quality of life assessment protocol in three stages: standard forward translation, translation synthesis, and backward translation. The Persian UCLA, tegner activity scale (TAS), short-form health survey (SF-36) and international physical activity questionnaire (IPAQ) were completed by 103 participants (candidates for knee replacement surgery). The Persian UCLA questionnaire was re-completed by 66 participants in the retest session with an interval of 3-7 days. An intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to evaluate test-retest reliability. The standard error of measurement (SEM) was used to determine smallest detectable change (SDC) in scores. To evaluate convergent validity of the Persian UCLA, its correlation with TAS, SF-36, and IPAQ was assessed using Spearman’s correlation test. The ceiling and floor effects were also calculated. Results: In the Persian version, no special changes were made and no problem or ambiguity was reported by the respondents based on a pilot study. The type of activities mentioned in the original version was not changed either and none of the participants had difficulty understanding the items. The Mean±SD of UCLA scores were 2.98±1.37 in the test phase and 2.89±1.32 in the retest phase. Psychometric tests results showed acceptable test-retest reliability of the Persian UCLA (ICC=0.96, 95% CI=0.93-0.97). Given an SDC score of 0.50 at 95% confidence interval, it can be said that if the UCLA score be above or less than 0.50, there is an improvement or decline in the activity level of patients. Based on the results of Spearman correlation test, the Persian UCLA showed a strong correlation with TAS (rs=0.71, P<0.001), a moderate correlation with IPAQ (rs=0.58, P<0.001) and physical health summary component of SF-36 (rs=0.59, P<0.001), and a weak correlation with the mental health summary component of SF-36 (rs=0.39, P<0.001). The Persian UCLA questionnaire had no ceiling or floor effects. Conclusion: The Persian version of the UCLA questionnaire has acceptable reliability and validity for Iranian candidates for knee replacement surgery.","PeriodicalId":46374,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32598/rj.23.1.3429.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to translate and cross-culturally adapt the University of California at Los Angles Activity Scale (UCLA) to Iranian samples and evaluate the reliability and validity of the Persian UCLA in candidates for knee replacement surgery. Materials & Methods: In this cross-sectional study, cross-cultural adaptation was performed according to the international quality of life assessment protocol in three stages: standard forward translation, translation synthesis, and backward translation. The Persian UCLA, tegner activity scale (TAS), short-form health survey (SF-36) and international physical activity questionnaire (IPAQ) were completed by 103 participants (candidates for knee replacement surgery). The Persian UCLA questionnaire was re-completed by 66 participants in the retest session with an interval of 3-7 days. An intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to evaluate test-retest reliability. The standard error of measurement (SEM) was used to determine smallest detectable change (SDC) in scores. To evaluate convergent validity of the Persian UCLA, its correlation with TAS, SF-36, and IPAQ was assessed using Spearman’s correlation test. The ceiling and floor effects were also calculated. Results: In the Persian version, no special changes were made and no problem or ambiguity was reported by the respondents based on a pilot study. The type of activities mentioned in the original version was not changed either and none of the participants had difficulty understanding the items. The Mean±SD of UCLA scores were 2.98±1.37 in the test phase and 2.89±1.32 in the retest phase. Psychometric tests results showed acceptable test-retest reliability of the Persian UCLA (ICC=0.96, 95% CI=0.93-0.97). Given an SDC score of 0.50 at 95% confidence interval, it can be said that if the UCLA score be above or less than 0.50, there is an improvement or decline in the activity level of patients. Based on the results of Spearman correlation test, the Persian UCLA showed a strong correlation with TAS (rs=0.71, P<0.001), a moderate correlation with IPAQ (rs=0.58, P<0.001) and physical health summary component of SF-36 (rs=0.59, P<0.001), and a weak correlation with the mental health summary component of SF-36 (rs=0.39, P<0.001). The Persian UCLA questionnaire had no ceiling or floor effects. Conclusion: The Persian version of the UCLA questionnaire has acceptable reliability and validity for Iranian candidates for knee replacement surgery.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加州大学洛杉矶分校(UCLA)波斯语版活动量表在膝关节置换术患者中的信度和效度
目的:本研究旨在翻译和跨文化适应加利福尼亚大学洛杉矶分校活动量表(UCLA)到伊朗样本,并评估波斯UCLA在膝关节置换术候选人中的可靠性和有效性。材料与方法:在本横断面研究中,根据国际生活质量评估方案进行跨文化适应,分为标准正向翻译、翻译综合和逆向翻译三个阶段。103例膝关节置换术患者分别完成了波斯UCLA量表、膝关节活动量表(TAS)、SF-36问卷和国际体育活动问卷(IPAQ)。66名参与者在重新测试期间以3-7天的间隔重新完成波斯语UCLA问卷。用类内相关系数(ICC)评价重测信度。测量标准误差(SEM)用于确定分数的最小可检测变化(SDC)。为了评估波斯UCLA的收敛效度,采用Spearman相关检验评估其与TAS、SF-36和IPAQ的相关性。还计算了天花板和地板效应。结果:在波斯语版本中,根据初步研究,没有特别的改变,没有问题或歧义被受访者报告。原始版本中提到的活动类型也没有改变,并且没有参与者在理解项目方面有困难。测试期UCLA评分的均值±SD为2.98±1.37,复测期为2.89±1.32。心理测试结果显示波斯UCLA的重测信度可接受(ICC=0.96, 95% CI=0.93-0.97)。假设在95%置信区间下,SDC评分为0.50,则UCLA评分高于或低于0.50,表明患者的活动水平有所改善或下降。Spearman相关检验结果显示,波斯UCLA与TAS有较强相关性(rs=0.71, P<0.001),与IPAQ有中等相关性(rs=0.58, P<0.001),与SF-36的身体健康总结部分有较弱相关性(rs=0.59, P<0.001),与SF-36的心理健康总结部分有较弱相关性(rs=0.39, P<0.001)。加州大学洛杉矶分校的波斯问卷没有上限或下限效应。结论:波斯语版UCLA问卷对伊朗膝关节置换术患者具有可接受的信度和效度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION
JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION REHABILITATION-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Effect of Pelvic Floor Muscle Exercises on Urinary Incontinence and Leisure Time activities of Women with Multiple Sclerosis The best time of weight bearing after ACL reconstruction, immediately or delayed? A randomized clinical trial Translation and Psychometric Analysis of The Farsi Version of The Watlx Outpatient Rehabilitation of Service Patients' Experience Questionnaire Effect of Pitch Discrimination-Based Rehabilitation on Diagnostic Indices of Dichotic Digit Test, monaural Selective Auditory Attention Test, and Pitch Pattern Test in Children Suspected of Auditory Processing Disorder with Pitch Discrimination Deficits The Effectiveness of Cogniplus Cognitive Training Program on Social Cognition (Theory of Mind) in 6-8-Year-Old Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1