Intraocular Pressure and Medication Changes Associated with Xen Gel Stent: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

IF 1.8 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY Clinical ophthalmology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OPTH.S390955
Joseph F Panarelli, Vanessa Vera, Arsham Sheybani, Nathan Radcliffe, Richard Fiscella, Brian A Francis, Oluwatosin U Smith, Robert J Noecker
{"title":"Intraocular Pressure and Medication Changes Associated with Xen Gel Stent: A Systematic Review of the Literature.","authors":"Joseph F Panarelli,&nbsp;Vanessa Vera,&nbsp;Arsham Sheybani,&nbsp;Nathan Radcliffe,&nbsp;Richard Fiscella,&nbsp;Brian A Francis,&nbsp;Oluwatosin U Smith,&nbsp;Robert J Noecker","doi":"10.2147/OPTH.S390955","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Xen gel stent (Allergan Inc, an AbbVie company; Dublin, Ireland) was conceived as an option for patients requiring modest IOP reduction but for whom trabeculectomy was not yet indicated. As with any glaucoma surgery, establishing criteria for patient selection and identifying factors that contribute to a high likelihood of success are important. To help guide clinical decision-making, a systematic review of published studies on the gel stent was performed, with the goal of understanding postoperative outcomes based on clinical and patient factors. Results were organized around a series of pertinent clinical questions based on scenarios encountered in clinical practice. Criteria for including studies were intentionally broad, with the objective of simulating the diverse population of glaucoma patients encountered in real-world practice. Outcomes for IOP and medication reduction postoperatively were assessed in various analyses, including in eyes with various glaucoma types and severity; in eyes naïve to surgery as well as those with a history of prior incisional glaucoma surgery; and when surgery was performed as a standalone procedure or at the time of cataract surgery. The results of each of the various analyses were consistent in demonstrating that successful gel stent surgery achieved a postoperative IOP of approximately 14.0 mm Hg and reduction to fewer than 1 glaucoma medication. Additional data are shown on outcomes by method of implant (ab interno vs ab externo); intraoperative use of antifibrotics; and rates of needling in published studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":10442,"journal":{"name":"Clinical ophthalmology","volume":"17 ","pages":"25-46"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/74/7e/opth-17-25.PMC9845068.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S390955","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The Xen gel stent (Allergan Inc, an AbbVie company; Dublin, Ireland) was conceived as an option for patients requiring modest IOP reduction but for whom trabeculectomy was not yet indicated. As with any glaucoma surgery, establishing criteria for patient selection and identifying factors that contribute to a high likelihood of success are important. To help guide clinical decision-making, a systematic review of published studies on the gel stent was performed, with the goal of understanding postoperative outcomes based on clinical and patient factors. Results were organized around a series of pertinent clinical questions based on scenarios encountered in clinical practice. Criteria for including studies were intentionally broad, with the objective of simulating the diverse population of glaucoma patients encountered in real-world practice. Outcomes for IOP and medication reduction postoperatively were assessed in various analyses, including in eyes with various glaucoma types and severity; in eyes naïve to surgery as well as those with a history of prior incisional glaucoma surgery; and when surgery was performed as a standalone procedure or at the time of cataract surgery. The results of each of the various analyses were consistent in demonstrating that successful gel stent surgery achieved a postoperative IOP of approximately 14.0 mm Hg and reduction to fewer than 1 glaucoma medication. Additional data are shown on outcomes by method of implant (ab interno vs ab externo); intraoperative use of antifibrotics; and rates of needling in published studies.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与Xen凝胶支架相关的眼压和药物变化:文献的系统回顾。
Xen凝胶支架(Allergan Inc ., AbbVie公司;都柏林,爱尔兰)被认为是需要适度降低IOP但尚未需要小梁切除术的患者的选择。与任何青光眼手术一样,建立患者选择标准和确定高成功率因素非常重要。为了帮助指导临床决策,我们对已发表的关于凝胶支架的研究进行了系统回顾,目的是了解基于临床和患者因素的术后结果。结果是根据临床实践中遇到的情况,围绕一系列相关的临床问题组织的。纳入研究的标准是有意广泛的,目的是模拟现实世界中遇到的青光眼患者的不同人群。通过各种分析评估术后IOP和药物减少的结果,包括不同青光眼类型和严重程度的眼睛;手术后naïve以及既往有切口青光眼手术史的患者;当手术作为一个独立的程序进行或者在白内障手术的时候。各种分析的结果都一致表明,成功的凝胶支架手术使术后IOP约为14.0 mm Hg,减少到少于1种青光眼药物。其他数据显示了不同植入方式的结果(内植入vs外植入);术中抗纤维化药物的使用;以及发表的研究中针刺的比率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical ophthalmology
Clinical ophthalmology OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
9.10%
发文量
499
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Optimal Duration of Monocular Occlusion to Eliminate Fusion Effect in Intermittent Exotropia Time Savings Using a Digital Workflow versus a Conventional for Intraocular Lens Implantation in a Corporate Chain Hospital Setting The Prevalence and Severity of Acquired Blepharoptosis in US Eye Care Clinic Patients and Their Receptivity to Treatment Fungal Keratitis: Diagnosis, Management, and Recent Advances Evaluation of Foveal Avascular Zone After Strabismic and Anisometropic Amblyopia Therapy in Saudi Children Using Optic Coherence Tomography Angiography: A Cohort Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1