Crimmigration as Population Management in the “Control Society”

IF 0.4 Q2 Social Sciences New Criminal Law Review Pub Date : 2019-08-01 DOI:10.1525/NCLR.2019.22.3.236
Rottem Rosenberg Rubins
{"title":"Crimmigration as Population Management in the “Control Society”","authors":"Rottem Rosenberg Rubins","doi":"10.1525/NCLR.2019.22.3.236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Scholars have offered various accounts of the forces that have caused the contemporary convergence of immigration enforcement and criminal law enforcement, known as “crimmigration.” This article argues that such accounts are insufficient, either because they have difficulty explaining the concrete practices by which crimmigration regimes operate, or because they explain the intersection of criminal law and immigration law solely from the perspective of the former. Additionally, much crimmigration scholarship has difficulty explaining why crimmigration regimes target populations that are principally undeportable, such as asylum-seekers. To fill these voids, this article conceptualizes crimmigration as a product of what Deleuze has termed the “control society.” Such conceptualization clarifies the objectives underlying crimmigration: namely, handling aggregates of presumably deviant groups and keeping dangerous behavior at an acceptable level. Additionally, it assists in explaining the precise practices by which crimmigration regimes operate, particularly the utilization of flexible and decentralized techniques of power. The objectives and manners of exercising power typical of the control society currently govern both criminal and immigration law, causing the unprecedented cooperation of these two fields. Furthermore, as a product of the control society, crimmigration is primarily a regime of domestic policing and population management, as opposed to a system dedicated to the deportation of undesirable migrants. By applying a methodology of textual analysis to the case study of detention of asylum-seekers in Israel, the article demonstrates the vast impact that the underlying principles of the control society have on the making of crimmigration regimes.","PeriodicalId":44796,"journal":{"name":"New Criminal Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Criminal Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1525/NCLR.2019.22.3.236","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Scholars have offered various accounts of the forces that have caused the contemporary convergence of immigration enforcement and criminal law enforcement, known as “crimmigration.” This article argues that such accounts are insufficient, either because they have difficulty explaining the concrete practices by which crimmigration regimes operate, or because they explain the intersection of criminal law and immigration law solely from the perspective of the former. Additionally, much crimmigration scholarship has difficulty explaining why crimmigration regimes target populations that are principally undeportable, such as asylum-seekers. To fill these voids, this article conceptualizes crimmigration as a product of what Deleuze has termed the “control society.” Such conceptualization clarifies the objectives underlying crimmigration: namely, handling aggregates of presumably deviant groups and keeping dangerous behavior at an acceptable level. Additionally, it assists in explaining the precise practices by which crimmigration regimes operate, particularly the utilization of flexible and decentralized techniques of power. The objectives and manners of exercising power typical of the control society currently govern both criminal and immigration law, causing the unprecedented cooperation of these two fields. Furthermore, as a product of the control society, crimmigration is primarily a regime of domestic policing and population management, as opposed to a system dedicated to the deportation of undesirable migrants. By applying a methodology of textual analysis to the case study of detention of asylum-seekers in Israel, the article demonstrates the vast impact that the underlying principles of the control society have on the making of crimmigration regimes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“管制社会”中的人口管理——犯罪移民
学者们对导致移民执法和刑事执法在当代趋同的各种力量提出了不同的解释,这些力量被称为“犯罪移民”。本文认为,这种解释是不够的,要么是因为它们难以解释刑事移民制度运作的具体做法,要么是因为它们仅仅从前者的角度解释刑法和移民法的交集。此外,许多犯罪移徙研究难以解释为什么犯罪移徙制度的目标主要是无法驱逐出境的人口,例如寻求庇护者。为了填补这些空白,本文将犯罪移民概念化为德勒兹所称的“控制社会”的产物。这种概念化澄清了犯罪移徙的基本目标:即处理可能偏离正常的群体,并将危险行为保持在可接受的水平。此外,它有助于解释移徙犯罪制度运作的确切做法,特别是利用灵活和分散的权力技术。控制社会典型的行使权力的目标和方式目前支配着刑法和移民法,造成了这两个领域前所未有的合作。此外,作为控制社会的产物,犯罪移徙主要是一种国内警务和人口管理制度,而不是一种专门驱逐不受欢迎的移徙者的制度。通过将文本分析方法应用于以色列拘留寻求庇护者的案例研究,本文展示了控制社会的基本原则对犯罪移民制度的制定产生的巨大影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Focused on examinations of crime and punishment in domestic, transnational, and international contexts, New Criminal Law Review provides timely, innovative commentary and in-depth scholarly analyses on a wide range of criminal law topics. The journal encourages a variety of methodological and theoretical approaches and is a crucial resource for criminal law professionals in both academia and the criminal justice system. The journal publishes thematic forum sections and special issues, full-length peer-reviewed articles, book reviews, and occasional correspondence.
期刊最新文献
Algorithmic Decision-Making When Humans Disagree on Ends Editor’s Introduction The Limits of Retributivism Bringing People Down The Conventional Problem with Corporate Sentencing (and One Unconventional Solution)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1