CRISPR-based Approaches for the Point-of-Care Diagnosis of COVID19

IF 0.3 4区 医学 Q4 Medicine Acta Medica Mediterranea Pub Date : 2022-03-16 DOI:10.32552/2022.actamedica.626
İhsan Alp Uzay, P. Dincer
{"title":"CRISPR-based Approaches for the Point-of-Care Diagnosis of COVID19","authors":"İhsan Alp Uzay, P. Dincer","doi":"10.32552/2022.actamedica.626","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus -2 (SARS-CoV-2), is a novel Betacoronavirus variant that emerged in December 2019 causing the coronavirus disease 19 (COVID19) pandemic. It is reported that asymptomatic and presymptomatic individuals can transmit the virus and this silent transmission has been a major obstacle for the control of the pandemic. To overcome this obstacle, widespread testing with a rapid turnaround time is required. Reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) is currently the golden standard for the diagnosis of COVID19 worldwide. Even though RT-qPCR is an efficient method in terms of sensitivity and specificity, the need for elaborate instrumentation and skilled personnel restricts its widespread use. Restriction of RT-qPCR to a limited number of laboratories makes it further time-consuming. Many approaches are present to address the requirement for a rapid and accurate COVID19 diagnosis. In this review, different CRISPR-based approaches for the point-of-care diagnosis of COVID19 are compared. Among these approaches, CRISPR-FDS on-chip assay is found to be the best option as it is reported to be highly sensitive and specific, has a short turnaround time (15 min), does not need RNA isolation or special tools, and simple to perform. In terms of clinical validation, SHERLOCK, STOPCovid, and DETECTR were the most extensively studied ones and they are also reported to be highly sensitive and specific compared to RT-qPCR.","PeriodicalId":50891,"journal":{"name":"Acta Medica Mediterranea","volume":"48 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Medica Mediterranea","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32552/2022.actamedica.626","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus -2 (SARS-CoV-2), is a novel Betacoronavirus variant that emerged in December 2019 causing the coronavirus disease 19 (COVID19) pandemic. It is reported that asymptomatic and presymptomatic individuals can transmit the virus and this silent transmission has been a major obstacle for the control of the pandemic. To overcome this obstacle, widespread testing with a rapid turnaround time is required. Reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) is currently the golden standard for the diagnosis of COVID19 worldwide. Even though RT-qPCR is an efficient method in terms of sensitivity and specificity, the need for elaborate instrumentation and skilled personnel restricts its widespread use. Restriction of RT-qPCR to a limited number of laboratories makes it further time-consuming. Many approaches are present to address the requirement for a rapid and accurate COVID19 diagnosis. In this review, different CRISPR-based approaches for the point-of-care diagnosis of COVID19 are compared. Among these approaches, CRISPR-FDS on-chip assay is found to be the best option as it is reported to be highly sensitive and specific, has a short turnaround time (15 min), does not need RNA isolation or special tools, and simple to perform. In terms of clinical validation, SHERLOCK, STOPCovid, and DETECTR were the most extensively studied ones and they are also reported to be highly sensitive and specific compared to RT-qPCR.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于crispr的covid - 19即时诊断方法
严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒-2 (SARS-CoV-2)是一种新型冠状病毒变体,于2019年12月出现,导致冠状病毒病19 (covid - 19)大流行。据报道,无症状和无症状的个体也可以传播病毒,这种无声传播一直是控制大流行的主要障碍。为了克服这一障碍,需要在短时间内进行广泛的测试。逆转录-定量聚合酶链反应(RT-qPCR)是目前世界范围内诊断covid - 19的黄金标准。尽管RT-qPCR在灵敏度和特异性方面是一种有效的方法,但对精密仪器和熟练人员的需求限制了其广泛使用。限制RT-qPCR的实验室数量有限,使其进一步耗时。目前有许多方法可以满足快速准确诊断covid - 19的要求。在这篇综述中,比较了基于crispr的不同方法用于covid - 19的即时诊断。在这些方法中,CRISPR-FDS片上检测被认为是最好的选择,因为它具有高灵敏度和特异性,周转时间短(15分钟),不需要RNA分离或特殊工具,操作简单。在临床验证方面,SHERLOCK、STOPCovid和DETECTR是研究最广泛的,与RT-qPCR相比,它们也具有高度的敏感性和特异性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Medica Mediterranea
Acta Medica Mediterranea 医学-医学:内科
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Medica Mediterranea is an indipendent, international, English-language, peer-reviewed journal, online and open-access, designed for internists and phisicians. The journal publishes a variety of manuscript types, including review articles, original research, case reports and letters to the editor.
期刊最新文献
Older patients’ driving safety with the help of DRIVING SIMULATOR: Which cognitive test can predict better driving safety? Evaluation of the results of intra-articular platelet-rich plasma injections in patients with knee osteoarthritis Low-grade glial tumors: The experience of an oncology hospital in Türkiye High 30-day readmission rates in hospitalized patients with heart failure: Strengthening the need for a multidisciplinary and integrated approach Malignancy and Sarcoidosis: A Single Center Experience from Turkey
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1