Subalterns and the city: Dubai as cross-cultural caravanserai in City of Life and Pinky Memsaab

IF 0.5 0 FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION Transnational Screens Pub Date : 2020-12-01 DOI:10.1080/25785273.2020.1823077
A. Devasundaram
{"title":"Subalterns and the city: Dubai as cross-cultural caravanserai in City of Life and Pinky Memsaab","authors":"A. Devasundaram","doi":"10.1080/25785273.2020.1823077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Within the archetypal vision of Dubai as ostentatious oil-rich global megacity, this essay’s alternative scoping sees a city of interconnected spatio-cultural archipelagos. In these crisscrossing synapses, marginal outsiders can occupy potentially disruptive positions within mainstream power matrices and exclusionary corridors of capitalism. Interrogating a commonly accepted paradigm of subaltern urbanism, I argue that the invariable typecasting of subaltern spaces and association of subaltern demographics with the spatial strictures of urban slums, shanty towns, ghettoes and favelas retrenches the imaginary of the subaltern as excluded abject destined to dwell apart and dislocated from the epicentre of legitimised social, cultural, economic and political activity. Instead, the subaltern presence within mainstream urban ecosystems of power concentration and capital dominance constitutes a chance for dispossessed outsiders to disrupt the legitimised linearity of privileged stakeholders’ entitlement and always-already assumed ‘right to the city‘. I will appraise two films where Dubai is positioned as a site for subaltern Asian disruptors acting as both silent and voluble agents from within elite social structures. British-Emirati director Ali F. Mostafa’s City of Life(2009) and Pakistani filmmaker Shazia Ali Khan’s Pinky Memsaab (2018) harness Dubai as a cosmopolitan canvas where inter-Asian informal and formal modes of lived experience intertwine with heterotopic transglobal textures of the city’s capital-dominated relational grid. Ultimately, this paper demonstrates how subaltern South Asian subjects in exilic global hubs such as Dubai carry potentiality of acting as internal agents, working within capitalism’s mainstream power structures to perform informality as a mode of organic and endogenous resistance.","PeriodicalId":36578,"journal":{"name":"Transnational Screens","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transnational Screens","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/25785273.2020.1823077","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Within the archetypal vision of Dubai as ostentatious oil-rich global megacity, this essay’s alternative scoping sees a city of interconnected spatio-cultural archipelagos. In these crisscrossing synapses, marginal outsiders can occupy potentially disruptive positions within mainstream power matrices and exclusionary corridors of capitalism. Interrogating a commonly accepted paradigm of subaltern urbanism, I argue that the invariable typecasting of subaltern spaces and association of subaltern demographics with the spatial strictures of urban slums, shanty towns, ghettoes and favelas retrenches the imaginary of the subaltern as excluded abject destined to dwell apart and dislocated from the epicentre of legitimised social, cultural, economic and political activity. Instead, the subaltern presence within mainstream urban ecosystems of power concentration and capital dominance constitutes a chance for dispossessed outsiders to disrupt the legitimised linearity of privileged stakeholders’ entitlement and always-already assumed ‘right to the city‘. I will appraise two films where Dubai is positioned as a site for subaltern Asian disruptors acting as both silent and voluble agents from within elite social structures. British-Emirati director Ali F. Mostafa’s City of Life(2009) and Pakistani filmmaker Shazia Ali Khan’s Pinky Memsaab (2018) harness Dubai as a cosmopolitan canvas where inter-Asian informal and formal modes of lived experience intertwine with heterotopic transglobal textures of the city’s capital-dominated relational grid. Ultimately, this paper demonstrates how subaltern South Asian subjects in exilic global hubs such as Dubai carry potentiality of acting as internal agents, working within capitalism’s mainstream power structures to perform informality as a mode of organic and endogenous resistance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
副官和城市:迪拜在《生活之城》和《粉红酒店》中的跨文化旅居
在迪拜作为一个石油丰富的全球大都市的原型愿景中,本文的另一种范围看到了一个相互联系的空间文化群岛城市。在这些纵横交错的突触中,边缘的局外人可以在主流权力矩阵和资本主义的排他性走廊中占据潜在的破坏性地位。在对普遍接受的下层城市主义范式进行质疑时,我认为,下层空间的不变模式化以及下层人口与城市贫民窟、棚户区、贫民窟和贫民窟的空间限制的联系,削弱了下层人口作为被排除的贱民的想象,这些贱民注定要远离合法的社会、文化、经济和政治活动的中心。相反,在权力集中和资本主导的主流城市生态系统中,次等的存在构成了被剥夺的局外人破坏特权利益相关者权利的合法线性的机会,并且总是已经假定了“城市权利”。我将评价两部电影,其中迪拜被定位为下层亚洲颠覆者的场所,这些颠覆者在精英社会结构中扮演沉默和健谈的代理人。英裔阿联酋导演阿里·f·穆斯塔法的《生活之城》(2009)和巴基斯坦电影制作人沙齐亚·阿里·汗的《粉红之城》(2018)将迪拜作为一个国际化的画布,在这里,亚洲之间非正式和正式的生活体验模式与城市资本主导的关系网格的异位跨全球纹理交织在一起。最后,本文展示了在迪拜等流亡全球中心的次等南亚主体如何具有充当内部代理人的潜力,在资本主义的主流权力结构中工作,将非正式性作为一种有机和内生抵抗的模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Transnational Screens
Transnational Screens Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊最新文献
The recent Sino-Danish film co-productions: soft power and transnational talent development The role of Sino-Arab film collaboration on cultural diplomacy during the ‘Seventeen Years’ Sino-international film collaboration and co-production: policy and practice Jeffrey Lau’s journey to the mainland: strategic hybridization in Hong Kong-mainland film co-production Science fiction cinema in the twenty-first century: transnational futures, cosmopolitan concerns Science fiction cinema in the twenty-first century: transnational futures, cosmopolitan concerns , Pablo Gómez-Muñoz, Abingdon, Routledge, 2023, xi, 1–181 pp., Paperback, £37.99, ISBN 978–0–367–75906–3
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1