Therapy dogs for children with autism spectrum disorder: Impacts of active versus passive dog engagement

Deanna L Tepper, O. Landry, T. Howell, Delwyne Stephens, J. Molina, P. Bennett
{"title":"Therapy dogs for children with autism spectrum disorder: Impacts of active versus passive dog engagement","authors":"Deanna L Tepper, O. Landry, T. Howell, Delwyne Stephens, J. Molina, P. Bennett","doi":"10.1079/hai.2022.0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The use of animal-assisted interventions as a method of improving symptoms of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is becoming increasingly common, with a significant proportion of available literature suggesting improvements in social communication and interaction. Less is known about potential impacts on restricted and repetitive behaviors, motor skills, or executive functions. Furthermore, it is unknown what level of interaction with an animal, if any, is needed to produce improvements. In the current study, the behavior and skills of 16 children diagnosed with ASD, aged 2 to 4 years, were observed when a therapy dog, Muffin, was actively interacting with them, passively present in a classroom, or absent from the classroom. Contrary to expectations, the children actively interacted with the dog only infrequently, and there were no differences across conditions on numerous variables. Muffin’s presence and activity level was only associated with motor skills in the children, with results indicating that the participants were more likely to remain stationary than engage in physical activity when the therapy dog was present, perhaps indicating a global calming effect. The general lack of significant differences suggests that further studies may be necessary to determine exactly which symptoms of ASD respond to animal-assisted interventions, and also to determine optimal treatment dosage and frequency. We contend that the design of animal-assisted intervention may be critical in producing previously reported benefits.","PeriodicalId":90845,"journal":{"name":"Human-animal interaction bulletin","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human-animal interaction bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1079/hai.2022.0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of animal-assisted interventions as a method of improving symptoms of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is becoming increasingly common, with a significant proportion of available literature suggesting improvements in social communication and interaction. Less is known about potential impacts on restricted and repetitive behaviors, motor skills, or executive functions. Furthermore, it is unknown what level of interaction with an animal, if any, is needed to produce improvements. In the current study, the behavior and skills of 16 children diagnosed with ASD, aged 2 to 4 years, were observed when a therapy dog, Muffin, was actively interacting with them, passively present in a classroom, or absent from the classroom. Contrary to expectations, the children actively interacted with the dog only infrequently, and there were no differences across conditions on numerous variables. Muffin’s presence and activity level was only associated with motor skills in the children, with results indicating that the participants were more likely to remain stationary than engage in physical activity when the therapy dog was present, perhaps indicating a global calming effect. The general lack of significant differences suggests that further studies may be necessary to determine exactly which symptoms of ASD respond to animal-assisted interventions, and also to determine optimal treatment dosage and frequency. We contend that the design of animal-assisted intervention may be critical in producing previously reported benefits.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
治疗犬对自闭症谱系障碍儿童的影响:主动与被动狗参与的影响
使用动物辅助干预作为改善自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)症状的一种方法正变得越来越普遍,现有文献中有很大一部分表明改善了社会沟通和互动。对限制性和重复性行为、运动技能或执行功能的潜在影响知之甚少。此外,尚不清楚与动物的何种程度的相互作用(如果有的话)才能产生改善。在目前的研究中,研究人员观察了16名年龄在2至4岁之间被诊断为ASD的儿童在治疗犬Muffin与他们积极互动、被动出现在教室或缺席教室时的行为和技能。与预期相反,孩子们很少与狗积极互动,并且在许多变量上没有不同条件的差异。松饼的存在和活动水平只与孩子们的运动技能有关,结果表明,当治疗犬在场时,参与者更有可能保持静止,而不是从事体育活动,这可能表明了一种全面的镇静效果。普遍缺乏显著差异表明,可能需要进一步的研究来确定ASD的哪些症状对动物辅助干预有反应,并确定最佳治疗剂量和频率。我们认为,动物辅助干预的设计可能对产生先前报道的益处至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Perception and Effect of Aggressive Dog Breeds on Human Social Interactions Impacts of Dog Ownership and Attachment on Total and Dog-related Physical Activity in Germany Comparing the Effect of Human-Dog Interactions and Progressive Muscle Relaxation on Self-Report and Physiological Measures of Stress Animal Welfare Considerations in Animal-Assisted Interventions The Loss of a Service Dog Through Retirement: Experiences and Impact on Human Partners
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1