Limitations of Serological Diagnosis of Typical Cat Scratch Disease and Recommendations for the Diagnostic Procedure.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases & Medical Microbiology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2023/4222511
Myrto Koutantou, Konstantinos Kambas, Sofia Makka, Pierre-Edouard Fournier, Didier Raoult, Emmanouil Angelakis
{"title":"Limitations of Serological Diagnosis of Typical Cat Scratch Disease and Recommendations for the Diagnostic Procedure.","authors":"Myrto Koutantou,&nbsp;Konstantinos Kambas,&nbsp;Sofia Makka,&nbsp;Pierre-Edouard Fournier,&nbsp;Didier Raoult,&nbsp;Emmanouil Angelakis","doi":"10.1155/2023/4222511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cat scratch disease (CSD) is the most common cause of bacterial infectious lymphadenopathy, especially in children, but its diagnosis still remains challenging. Serological assays are widely applied due to their simplicity and the non-invasive sampling. However, these techniques present several limitations, including not well-defined antigen preparation, assay conditions and cutoff titers, severe cross-reactions with other species and organisms, and the notably ranging seroprevalence in the normal population. The objective of this study is to review the literature in order to determine the best diagnostic procedure for the diagnosis of CSD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Databases including PubMed, Medline, Google Scholar, and Google were searched to determine the best diagnostic procedure for the diagnosis of CSD. A total of 437 papers were identified and screened, and after exclusion of papers that did not fulfill the including criteria, 63 papers were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>It was revealed that sensitivities of serological assays varied from 10% to 100%. Indeed, more than half of the studies reported a sensitivity lower than 70%, while 71% of them had a sensitivity lower than 80%. Moreover, specificities of serological assays ranged from 15% to 100%, with 25 assays reporting a specificity lower than 90%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It is considered that molecular assays should be the gold standard technique for CSD confirmation, and physicians are reinforced to proceed to lymph node biopsy in suspicious CSD cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":50715,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases & Medical Microbiology","volume":"2023 ","pages":"4222511"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10008113/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases & Medical Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/4222511","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Cat scratch disease (CSD) is the most common cause of bacterial infectious lymphadenopathy, especially in children, but its diagnosis still remains challenging. Serological assays are widely applied due to their simplicity and the non-invasive sampling. However, these techniques present several limitations, including not well-defined antigen preparation, assay conditions and cutoff titers, severe cross-reactions with other species and organisms, and the notably ranging seroprevalence in the normal population. The objective of this study is to review the literature in order to determine the best diagnostic procedure for the diagnosis of CSD.

Methods: Databases including PubMed, Medline, Google Scholar, and Google were searched to determine the best diagnostic procedure for the diagnosis of CSD. A total of 437 papers were identified and screened, and after exclusion of papers that did not fulfill the including criteria, 63 papers were used.

Results: It was revealed that sensitivities of serological assays varied from 10% to 100%. Indeed, more than half of the studies reported a sensitivity lower than 70%, while 71% of them had a sensitivity lower than 80%. Moreover, specificities of serological assays ranged from 15% to 100%, with 25 assays reporting a specificity lower than 90%.

Conclusion: It is considered that molecular assays should be the gold standard technique for CSD confirmation, and physicians are reinforced to proceed to lymph node biopsy in suspicious CSD cases.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
典型猫抓病血清学诊断的局限性及诊断程序的建议。
猫抓病(CSD)是细菌性感染性淋巴结病最常见的病因,尤其是在儿童中,但其诊断仍然具有挑战性。血清学检测因其简单、无创取样等优点而得到广泛应用。然而,这些技术存在一些局限性,包括没有明确定义的抗原制备,检测条件和切断滴度,与其他物种和生物体的严重交叉反应,以及正常人群中明显的血清阳性率。本研究的目的是回顾文献,以确定诊断CSD的最佳诊断程序。方法:检索PubMed、Medline、Google Scholar、Google等数据库,确定诊断CSD的最佳诊断程序。共筛选出437篇论文,剔除不符合纳入标准的论文后,共使用63篇论文。结果:血清学检测的敏感性在10% ~ 100%之间。事实上,超过一半的研究报告敏感度低于70%,而71%的研究报告敏感度低于80%。此外,血清学分析的特异性从15%到100%不等,有25项分析报告特异性低于90%。结论:分子检测应作为确诊CSD的金标准技术,对于可疑的CSD,应加强医生对其进行淋巴结活检。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
108
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases and Medical Microbiology is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to infectious diseases of bacterial, viral and parasitic origin. The journal welcomes articles describing research on pathogenesis, epidemiology of infection, diagnosis and treatment, antibiotics and resistance, and immunology.
期刊最新文献
Mpox Virus as a Global Public Health Emergency: A Scoping Review. Coxiellosis in Dogs-A Hitherto Masked Zoonosis in India: An Insight From Seromolecular Investigation and Risk Factor Analysis. The Role of Ursodeoxycholic Acid Administration During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Questionnaire Survey. Efficient Detection of West Nile Virus in Urine Specimens by a Novel In-House RT-qPCR Detection Kit. Predictive Application Value of Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing in the Resistance of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1