[UROLOGICAL CONSULT FOR PATIENT WITH RENAL COLIC BEFORE DISCHARGE FROM THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT (ED): THE OUTCOME EFFECT ON SPONTANEOUS STONE EXPULSION AND RE-VISIT TO ED].

Harefuah Pub Date : 2022-12-01
Amit Shemesh, Ben Shalom, Eyal Hen, Eyal Barkai, Fahed Atamna, Haitham Abu Nijmeh, Amir Cooper, Orit Raz
{"title":"[UROLOGICAL CONSULT FOR PATIENT WITH RENAL COLIC BEFORE DISCHARGE FROM THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT (ED): THE OUTCOME EFFECT ON SPONTANEOUS STONE EXPULSION AND RE-VISIT TO ED].","authors":"Amit Shemesh,&nbsp;Ben Shalom,&nbsp;Eyal Hen,&nbsp;Eyal Barkai,&nbsp;Fahed Atamna,&nbsp;Haitham Abu Nijmeh,&nbsp;Amir Cooper,&nbsp;Orit Raz","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Renal colic due to ureterolithiasis is a frequent reason for visiting the emergency departments (ED). The majority of those patients are managed non-surgically and will experience a spontaneous stone expulsion. The ED at our hospital works as a unified department, which is a well-established practice in Europe and North America.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>Assess the outcome of urological consultation in the ED for patients with urolithiasis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort examined 402 ureterolithiasis patients proven by abdominal CT-scan at the ED. Patients were divided into 3 groups: Group1: patients were discharged after evaluation by ED physician alone. In Group 2: patients were discharged after being evaluated by an ED physician and urologist. In Group 3: patients who were admitted to the Urology Department. Clinical, laboratory and imaging parameters were examined as well as patients' outcomes: spontaneous stone expulsion, re-visit to ED and surgical intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were not significant differences between group 1 and 2 regarding age, stone size, stone location, WBC levels, stone expulsion rate or surgical intervention. Group 1 had a significant higher rate of ED re-visits compared with group 2 (79 (43.3%) vs. 12 (17.9%). p=0.0002). Group 3 had significantly higher stone size, creatinine levels, inflammatory markers, proximal stone location and surgical interventions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ED working as a unified department provides excellent management to patients with renal colic due to ureterolithiasis, with a high rate of spontaneous stone expulsion and urologist referral to admissions and surgical interventions. Nevertheless, urological consultation significantly decreases re-visits to ED.</p>","PeriodicalId":12965,"journal":{"name":"Harefuah","volume":"161 12","pages":"751-756"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Harefuah","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Renal colic due to ureterolithiasis is a frequent reason for visiting the emergency departments (ED). The majority of those patients are managed non-surgically and will experience a spontaneous stone expulsion. The ED at our hospital works as a unified department, which is a well-established practice in Europe and North America.

Aims: Assess the outcome of urological consultation in the ED for patients with urolithiasis.

Methods: A retrospective cohort examined 402 ureterolithiasis patients proven by abdominal CT-scan at the ED. Patients were divided into 3 groups: Group1: patients were discharged after evaluation by ED physician alone. In Group 2: patients were discharged after being evaluated by an ED physician and urologist. In Group 3: patients who were admitted to the Urology Department. Clinical, laboratory and imaging parameters were examined as well as patients' outcomes: spontaneous stone expulsion, re-visit to ED and surgical intervention.

Results: There were not significant differences between group 1 and 2 regarding age, stone size, stone location, WBC levels, stone expulsion rate or surgical intervention. Group 1 had a significant higher rate of ED re-visits compared with group 2 (79 (43.3%) vs. 12 (17.9%). p=0.0002). Group 3 had significantly higher stone size, creatinine levels, inflammatory markers, proximal stone location and surgical interventions.

Conclusions: ED working as a unified department provides excellent management to patients with renal colic due to ureterolithiasis, with a high rate of spontaneous stone expulsion and urologist referral to admissions and surgical interventions. Nevertheless, urological consultation significantly decreases re-visits to ED.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[急诊科出院前肾绞痛患者的泌尿科会诊(ed):对自发性结石排出和再次就诊结果的影响]。
导读:输尿管结石引起的肾绞痛是急诊科(ED)的常见原因。这些患者中的大多数是非手术治疗的,并且会经历自发的结石排出。我们医院的急诊科是一个统一的科室,这在欧洲和北美都是很好的做法。目的:评估尿石症患者在急诊科的泌尿科会诊结果。方法:回顾性分析402例经急诊科腹部ct扫描证实的输尿管结石患者,将患者分为3组:第一组:经急诊科医师单独评估出院。第二组:患者经急诊科医生和泌尿科医生评估后出院。第三组:入泌尿外科的患者。检查临床、实验室和影像学参数以及患者的结果:自发结石排出、再次就诊ED和手术干预。结果:1组和2组在年龄、结石大小、结石位置、白细胞水平、结石排出率或手术干预方面无显著差异。组1的ED复诊率明显高于组2(79例(43.3%)vs. 12例(17.9%)。p = 0.0002)。3组结石大小、肌酐水平、炎症标志物、近端结石位置和手术干预均显著高于对照组。结论:急诊科作为一个统一的科室,为输尿管结石所致肾绞痛患者提供了良好的管理,自发性结石排出率高,泌尿科医生转诊入院和手术干预率高。然而,泌尿科会诊显著减少了急诊室的复诊。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[MENTAL HEALTH RISK MANAGEMENT: A THEORETICAL CHALLENGE TO APPLICABLE PRACTICE]. [PUBLIC EXPENDITURE ON MENTAL HEALTH IN ISRAEL: CALCULATION, ANALYSIS AND INTERNATIONAL COMPARISON]. [SAFETY CLIMATE AT WORK, ROLE PERCEPTION AND THE EFFECT OF THEIR INTERACTIONS ON PROFESSIONAL BEHAVIORAL INTENTIONS AND JOB SATISFACTION: A COMPARATIVE STUDY AMONG NURSING STAFF MEMBERS IN PSYCHIATRIC WARDS]. [COPING WITH THE UNSEEN WOUNDS TO EVALUATE THE HANDICAPS CAUSED BY PTSD]. [SLEEP MONITORING FOR PREDICTION OF MAJOR DEPRESSION RECURRENCE IN PATIENTS AT HIGH RISK - A PROSPECTIVE STUDY].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1