Adhesion of Two New Glass Fiber Post Systems Cemented with Self-Adhesive Resin Cements.

IF 1.6 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS Scandinavian Journal of Economics Pub Date : 2019-08-01 DOI:10.3390/dj7030080
Esin Özlek, Prasanna Neelakantan, Jukka Pekka Matinlinna, Sema Belli, Mehmet Ugur, Idrıs Kavut
{"title":"Adhesion of Two New Glass Fiber Post Systems Cemented with Self-Adhesive Resin Cements.","authors":"Esin Özlek, Prasanna Neelakantan, Jukka Pekka Matinlinna, Sema Belli, Mehmet Ugur, Idrıs Kavut","doi":"10.3390/dj7030080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the adhesion strength of two new fiber post systems (FiberSite™ Post and Cytec™ Blanco Post) cemented with two different adhesive resin cements (Panavia™ SA and Maxcem™ Elite). Root canals of sixty extracted human mandibular premolars were prepared using ProTaper Universal™ rotary files (Dentsply Sirona Endodontics, York, PA, USA). The root canals were irrigated with 5.25% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) during instrumentation. After root canal preparation, the canals were irrigated with 2 mL of 17% EDTA (1 min), followed by 2 mL of 5.25% (5 min) NaOCI, and 2 mL saline. The root canals were dried with paper points and divided randomly into two study groups (<i>n</i> = 30) according to the type of post system: Group 1, FiberSite™ Post (MegaDental, Partanna, Italy); and group 2, Cytec™ Blanco Post (Hahnenkratt, Königsbach-Stein, Germany), with one of the two adhesive resin cements: Subgroup A, Panavia™ SA Cement Plus Automix (Kuraray, Osaka, Japan); subgroup B, Maxcem™ Elite (Kerr, Orange, CA, USA). Following thermocycling, the adhesion strength was evaluated using the push-out adhesion (bond) strength test. Fractographic analysis was performed using stereomicroscope. The data were analyzed using two-way analysis of variance (<i>p</i> = 0.05). The adhesion strength values of both the posts were significantly higher when cemented with subgroup B (Maxcem™ Elite). The highest adhesion strength value was demonstrated by group 1B (FiberSite™ post cemented with Maxcem™ Elite cement). The type of post did not have a significant impact on the bond strength values for either cement material.</p>","PeriodicalId":47929,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Economics","volume":"82 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6784462/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/dj7030080","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the adhesion strength of two new fiber post systems (FiberSite™ Post and Cytec™ Blanco Post) cemented with two different adhesive resin cements (Panavia™ SA and Maxcem™ Elite). Root canals of sixty extracted human mandibular premolars were prepared using ProTaper Universal™ rotary files (Dentsply Sirona Endodontics, York, PA, USA). The root canals were irrigated with 5.25% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) during instrumentation. After root canal preparation, the canals were irrigated with 2 mL of 17% EDTA (1 min), followed by 2 mL of 5.25% (5 min) NaOCI, and 2 mL saline. The root canals were dried with paper points and divided randomly into two study groups (n = 30) according to the type of post system: Group 1, FiberSite™ Post (MegaDental, Partanna, Italy); and group 2, Cytec™ Blanco Post (Hahnenkratt, Königsbach-Stein, Germany), with one of the two adhesive resin cements: Subgroup A, Panavia™ SA Cement Plus Automix (Kuraray, Osaka, Japan); subgroup B, Maxcem™ Elite (Kerr, Orange, CA, USA). Following thermocycling, the adhesion strength was evaluated using the push-out adhesion (bond) strength test. Fractographic analysis was performed using stereomicroscope. The data were analyzed using two-way analysis of variance (p = 0.05). The adhesion strength values of both the posts were significantly higher when cemented with subgroup B (Maxcem™ Elite). The highest adhesion strength value was demonstrated by group 1B (FiberSite™ post cemented with Maxcem™ Elite cement). The type of post did not have a significant impact on the bond strength values for either cement material.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用自粘性树脂水泥粘接的两种新型玻璃纤维柱系统的附着力。
本体外研究旨在评估两种新型纤维桩系统(FiberSite™ Post 和 Cytec™ Blanco Post)与两种不同的粘接树脂水门汀(Panavia™ SA 和 Maxcem™ Elite)的粘接强度。使用 ProTaper Universal™ 旋转锉(Dentsply Sirona Endodontics,York,PA,USA)对六十颗拔出的下颌前磨牙进行根管预备。在器械操作过程中,用 5.25% 的次氯酸钠 (NaOCl) 冲洗根管。根管预备后,用 2 毫升 17% EDTA 冲洗根管(1 分钟),然后用 2 毫升 5.25% NaOCI(5 分钟)和 2 毫升生理盐水冲洗根管。用纸点烘干根管,并根据桩系统的类型随机分为两个研究组(n = 30):第一组,FiberSite™ 树桩(MegaDental,Partanna,意大利);第二组,Cytec™ Blanco 树桩(Hahnenkratt,Königsbach-Stein,德国),使用两种树脂粘接剂中的一种:A 组,Panavia™ SA Cement Plus Automix(Kuraray,Osaka,Japan);B 组,Maxcem™ Elite(Kerr,Orange,CA,USA)。热循环后,使用推出附着(粘接)强度测试评估附着强度。使用体视显微镜进行断面分析。数据采用双向方差分析(P = 0.05)。使用 B 组亚组(Maxcem™ Elite)粘结时,两种牙柱的粘结强度值都明显较高。粘附强度值最高的是 1B 组(用 Maxcem™ Elite 粘接剂粘接的 FiberSite™ 树柱)。支柱类型对两种水泥材料的粘接强度值均无明显影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: The Scandinavian Journal of Economics is one of the oldest and most distinguished economics journals in the world. It publishes research of the highest scientific quality from an international array of contributors in all areas of economics and related fields. The journal features: - Articles and empirical studies on economic theory and policy - Book reviews - Comprehensive surveys of the contributions to economics of the recipients of the Alfred Nobel Memorial Prize in Economics - A special issue each year on key topics in economics
期刊最新文献
Income tax evasion and third‐party reported consumption and wealth: implications for the optimal tax structure Optimal redistributive charity Does leadership promote a cleaner climate? Monopoly pricing with unknown demand The making and unmaking of opportunity: educational mobility in 20th‐century Denmark
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1