Why reducing the cosmic sound horizon can not fully resolve the Hubble tension

K. Jedamzik, L. Pogosian, Gong-Bo Zhao
{"title":"Why reducing the cosmic sound horizon can not fully resolve the Hubble tension","authors":"K. Jedamzik, L. Pogosian, Gong-Bo Zhao","doi":"10.21203/RS.3.RS-100387/V1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The mismatch between the locally measured expansion rate of the universe and the one inferred from the cosmic microwave background measurements by Planck in the context of the standard ΛCDM, known as the Hubble tension, has become one of the most pressing problems in cosmology. A large number of amendments to the ΛCDM model have been proposed in order to solve this tension. Many of them introduce new physics, such as early dark energy, modifications of the standard model neutrino sector, extra radiation, primordial magnetic fields or varying fundamental constants, with the aim of reducing the sound horizon at recombination r*. We demonstrate here that any model which only reduces r* can never fully resolve the Hubble tension while remaining consistent with other cosmological datasets. We show explicitly that models which operate at lower matter density Ωmh2 run into tension with the observations of baryon acoustic oscillations, while models operating at higher Ωmh2 develop tension with galaxy weak lensing data.","PeriodicalId":8431,"journal":{"name":"arXiv: Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv: Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21203/RS.3.RS-100387/V1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

The mismatch between the locally measured expansion rate of the universe and the one inferred from the cosmic microwave background measurements by Planck in the context of the standard ΛCDM, known as the Hubble tension, has become one of the most pressing problems in cosmology. A large number of amendments to the ΛCDM model have been proposed in order to solve this tension. Many of them introduce new physics, such as early dark energy, modifications of the standard model neutrino sector, extra radiation, primordial magnetic fields or varying fundamental constants, with the aim of reducing the sound horizon at recombination r*. We demonstrate here that any model which only reduces r* can never fully resolve the Hubble tension while remaining consistent with other cosmological datasets. We show explicitly that models which operate at lower matter density Ωmh2 run into tension with the observations of baryon acoustic oscillations, while models operating at higher Ωmh2 develop tension with galaxy weak lensing data.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为什么缩小宇宙声视界不能完全解决哈勃张力
局部测量的宇宙膨胀率与普朗克在标准ΛCDM背景下从宇宙微波背景测量中推断的宇宙膨胀率不匹配,即哈勃张力,已成为宇宙学中最紧迫的问题之一。为了解决这种矛盾,对ΛCDM模型提出了大量的修正。他们中的许多人引入了新的物理学,如早期暗能量,标准模型中微子扇区的修改,额外的辐射,原始磁场或变化的基本常数,目的是减少复合r*时的声视界。我们在这里证明,任何只降低r*的模型都无法完全解决哈勃张力,同时与其他宇宙学数据集保持一致。我们明确地表明,在较低物质密度Ωmh2下运行的模型与重子声学振荡的观测存在张力,而在较高物质密度Ωmh2下运行的模型与星系弱透镜数据存在张力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Primordial Black Holes: from Theory to Gravitational Wave Observations Chasing the Tail of Cosmic Reionization with Dark Gap Statistics in the Ly$α$ Forest over $5 < z < 6$ Hubble tension and absolute constraints on the local Hubble parameter. Towards an Optimal Estimation of Cosmological Parameters with the Wavelet Scattering Transform Assessment of the cosmic distance duality relation using Gaussian process
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1