Social Care Recommendations in National Diabetes Treatment Guidelines.

IF 5.2 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Current Diabetes Reports Pub Date : 2022-10-01 Epub Date: 2022-08-30 DOI:10.1007/s11892-022-01490-z
Benjamin Aceves, Rose Gunn, Maura Pisciotta, Na'amah Razon, Erika Cottrell, Danielle Hessler, Rachel Gold, Laura M Gottlieb
{"title":"Social Care Recommendations in National Diabetes Treatment Guidelines.","authors":"Benjamin Aceves, Rose Gunn, Maura Pisciotta, Na'amah Razon, Erika Cottrell, Danielle Hessler, Rachel Gold, Laura M Gottlieb","doi":"10.1007/s11892-022-01490-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>An expanding body of research documents associations between socioeconomic circumstances and health outcomes, which has led health care institutions to invest in new activities to identify and address patients' social circumstances in the context of care delivery. Despite growing national investment in these \"social care\" initiatives, the extent to which social care activities are routinely incorporated into care for patients with type II diabetes mellitus (T2D), specifically, is unknown. We conducted a scoping review of existing T2D treatment and management guidelines to explore whether and how these guidelines incorporate recommendations that reflect social care practice categories.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>We applied search terms to locate all T2D treatment and management guidelines for adults published in the US from 1977 to 2021. The search captured 158 national guidelines. We subsequently applied the National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine framework to search each guideline for recommendations related to five social care activities: Awareness, Adjustment, Assistance, Advocacy, and Alignment. The majority of guidelines (122; 77%) did not recommend any social care activities. The remainder (36; 23%) referred to one or more social care activities. In the guidelines that referred to at least one type of social care activity, adjustments to medical treatment based on social risk were most common [34/36 (94%)]. Recommended adjustments included decreasing medication costs to accommodate financial strain, changing literacy level or language of handouts, and providing virtual visits to accommodate transportation insecurity. Ensuring that practice guidelines more consistently reflect social care best practices may improve outcomes for patients living with T2D.</p>","PeriodicalId":10898,"journal":{"name":"Current Diabetes Reports","volume":"22 10","pages":"481-491"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9424801/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Diabetes Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892-022-01490-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/8/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: An expanding body of research documents associations between socioeconomic circumstances and health outcomes, which has led health care institutions to invest in new activities to identify and address patients' social circumstances in the context of care delivery. Despite growing national investment in these "social care" initiatives, the extent to which social care activities are routinely incorporated into care for patients with type II diabetes mellitus (T2D), specifically, is unknown. We conducted a scoping review of existing T2D treatment and management guidelines to explore whether and how these guidelines incorporate recommendations that reflect social care practice categories.

Recent findings: We applied search terms to locate all T2D treatment and management guidelines for adults published in the US from 1977 to 2021. The search captured 158 national guidelines. We subsequently applied the National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine framework to search each guideline for recommendations related to five social care activities: Awareness, Adjustment, Assistance, Advocacy, and Alignment. The majority of guidelines (122; 77%) did not recommend any social care activities. The remainder (36; 23%) referred to one or more social care activities. In the guidelines that referred to at least one type of social care activity, adjustments to medical treatment based on social risk were most common [34/36 (94%)]. Recommended adjustments included decreasing medication costs to accommodate financial strain, changing literacy level or language of handouts, and providing virtual visits to accommodate transportation insecurity. Ensuring that practice guidelines more consistently reflect social care best practices may improve outcomes for patients living with T2D.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
国家糖尿病治疗指南中的社会关怀建议。
审查目的:越来越多的研究记录了社会经济环境与健康结果之间的联系,这促使医疗机构投资开展新的活动,以在提供护理的过程中识别并解决患者的社会环境问题。尽管国家对这些 "社会关怀 "举措的投资不断增加,但社会关怀活动在II型糖尿病(T2D)患者护理中的常规融入程度尚不清楚。我们对现有的 T2D 治疗和管理指南进行了一次范围界定审查,以探讨这些指南是否以及如何纳入反映社会护理实践类别的建议:我们使用搜索条件查找了 1977 年至 2021 年期间在美国发布的所有成人 T2D 治疗和管理指南。此次搜索共获取了 158 份国家指南。随后,我们应用美国国家科学、工程和医学研究院的框架,搜索每份指南中与五项社会关怀活动相关的建议:认识、调整、援助、倡导和协调。大多数指南(122;77%)没有推荐任何社会关怀活动。其余的指南(36;23%)提到了一种或多种社会关怀活动。在至少提及一种社会关怀活动的指南中,根据社会风险调整医疗是最常见的[34/36 (94%)]。建议的调整包括降低药费以适应经济压力、改变识字水平或讲义语言,以及提供虚拟访问以适应交通不便的情况。确保实践指南更一致地反映社会护理最佳实践,可改善 T2D 患者的治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The goal of this journal is to publish cutting-edge reviews on subjects pertinent to all aspects of diabetes epidemiology, pathophysiology, and management. We aim to provide incisive, insightful, and balanced contributions from leading experts in each relevant domain that will be of immediate interest to a wide readership of clinicians, basic scientists, and translational investigators. We accomplish this aim by appointing major authorities to serve as Section Editors in key subject areas across the discipline. Section Editors select topics to be reviewed by leading experts who emphasize recent developments and highlight important papers published over the past year on their topics, in a crisp and readable format. We also provide commentaries from well-known figures in the field, and an Editorial Board of internationally diverse members suggests topics of special interest to their country/region and ensures that topics are current and include emerging research.
期刊最新文献
The Impact of Gestational Diabetes on Kidney Development: is There an Epigenetic Link? Parental Psychosocial Variables and Glycemic Control in T1D Pediatric Age: A Systematic Review. The Influence of Racial Discrimination as a Chronic Stressor on Type 2 Diabetes Risk and Self-Management Behaviors among Black Adults: A Scoping Review. Mind in Metabolism - A Comprehensive Literature Review on Diabetes and its Connections to Obsessive Compulsive Disorder, Schizophrenia, and Bipolar Disorder. Advancing Type 2 Diabetes Prevention through Text-Messaging Interventions: A Narrative Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1