Swedish (L1) and English (L2) Argumentative Writing of Upper Secondary Students with Reading Difficulties

IF 1 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH L1 Educational Studies in Language and Literature Pub Date : 2022-05-01 DOI:10.21248/l1esll.2022.22.1.405
Pär Sehlström, Christian Waldmann, Anders Steinvall, Maria Levlin
{"title":"Swedish (L1) and English (L2) Argumentative Writing of Upper Secondary Students with Reading Difficulties","authors":"Pär Sehlström, Christian Waldmann, Anders Steinvall, Maria Levlin","doi":"10.21248/l1esll.2022.22.1.405","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Writing has been identified as a challenge for students with reading difficulties. This study contributes to previous research by exploring argumentative writing in L1 (Swedish) and L2 (English) in a group of students with reading difficulties in upper secondary school. Participants were 19 students with typical reading, 19 students with poor decoding, and 9 students with poor comprehension. A majority of students attended vocational programmes. Written text quality was assessed by using an adapted version of Jacobs et al.’s (1981) analytic scoring scheme including content, organisation, cohesion, vocabulary, language use, spelling, and punctuation. Students with reading difficulties (regardless of reader subgroup) were found to perform poorly in all categories in both L1 and L2, with spelling being particularly challenging in L1, and cohesion, language use, spelling, and punctuation in L2. Significant differences were found between students with poor comprehension and students with typical reading in cohesion, language use and spelling in L2. Few other significant differences were identified possibly due to an overall poor writing outcome also for students with typical reading. This general poor outcome in writing is discussed in relation to previous studies on writing among students with reading difficulties and writing in vocational programmes.","PeriodicalId":43406,"journal":{"name":"L1 Educational Studies in Language and Literature","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"L1 Educational Studies in Language and Literature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21248/l1esll.2022.22.1.405","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Writing has been identified as a challenge for students with reading difficulties. This study contributes to previous research by exploring argumentative writing in L1 (Swedish) and L2 (English) in a group of students with reading difficulties in upper secondary school. Participants were 19 students with typical reading, 19 students with poor decoding, and 9 students with poor comprehension. A majority of students attended vocational programmes. Written text quality was assessed by using an adapted version of Jacobs et al.’s (1981) analytic scoring scheme including content, organisation, cohesion, vocabulary, language use, spelling, and punctuation. Students with reading difficulties (regardless of reader subgroup) were found to perform poorly in all categories in both L1 and L2, with spelling being particularly challenging in L1, and cohesion, language use, spelling, and punctuation in L2. Significant differences were found between students with poor comprehension and students with typical reading in cohesion, language use and spelling in L2. Few other significant differences were identified possibly due to an overall poor writing outcome also for students with typical reading. This general poor outcome in writing is discussed in relation to previous studies on writing among students with reading difficulties and writing in vocational programmes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阅读困难高中生的瑞典语(L1)和英语(L2)议论文写作
写作对有阅读困难的学生来说是一个挑战。本研究通过探索一组高中阅读困难学生的母语(瑞典语)和第二语言(英语)议论文写作,为之前的研究做出了贡献。参与者包括19名阅读能力一般的学生、19名解码能力差的学生和9名理解能力差的学生。 的大多数学生参加了职业课程。书面文本质量的评估采用了Jacobs等人(1981)的分析评分方案,包括内容、组织、衔接、词汇、语言使用、拼写和标点符号。研究发现,有阅读困难的学生(无论哪个读者群体)在第一语言和第二语言的所有类别中都表现不佳,其中第一语言的拼写尤其具有挑战性,第二语言的衔接、语言使用、拼写和标点都具有挑战性。阅读能力差的学生和阅读能力好的学生在二语衔接、语言使用和拼写方面存在显著差异。几乎没有其他显著的差异被确定,可能是由于总体上较差的写作结果,对于典型阅读的学生也是如此。这种普遍的写作不良结果与先前关于阅读困难学生写作和职业课程写作的研究有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
L1 Educational Studies in Language and Literature
L1 Educational Studies in Language and Literature EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Writing to Learn History: An Instructional Design Study High school students’ attentional stance, modes of reading engagement, and self-insight during literary reading Developing the “Language Profile Test” for Greek Students aged 11-15 Years. Strategies for Expository and Literary Texts Separating the relevant from the irrelevant: Factors influencing L1 student teachers’ ability to discern (ir)relevant arguments in time-pressured grammatical discussions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1