Looking West, Acting East: India's Indo-Pacific Strategy

R. Mukherjee
{"title":"Looking West, Acting East: India's Indo-Pacific Strategy","authors":"R. Mukherjee","doi":"10.1355/9789814843164-004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ever since the Indo-Pacific re-emerged as a viable strategic concept in 2017 and Asia’s four democratic major powers — the United States, Japan, Australia and India — reconvened their quadrilateral security dialogue (the Quad), Southeast Asian countries have been wary of ASEAN losing its centrality in the regional political and economic order. The conceptual linkage of the two oceans and consequent expansion of geopolitical space was bound to have this effect to some extent. Moreover, the combination of four democratic major powers in a region largely home to single-party governments and authoritarian regimes raised the spectre of goals beyond the containment of China, or at least the containment of China through the creation of democratic transitions on its periphery — this was an argument the original boosters of the Quad in Washington had made in 2007. Finally, the overlaying of the Quad on the Indo-Pacific concept gave rise to fears of a return to Cold War–style containment, this time of China, and major-power politics rearing its ugly head yet again in Southeast Asia. Although these concerns are real and require a response from ASEAN, Southeast Asian countries can expect to find support from an unexpected quarter: India. When the Quad was originally proposed in 2007, diplomatic protest from China had caused India and Australia to roll back their commitments, and the initiative went into stasis after George W. Bush and Shinzo Abe subsequently left office. A decade later, as the Quad returns, Australia’s and China’s positions have changed but India’s remains the same. Canberra is now an enthusiastic supporter","PeriodicalId":21900,"journal":{"name":"Southeast Asian Affairs","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southeast Asian Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1090","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1355/9789814843164-004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Ever since the Indo-Pacific re-emerged as a viable strategic concept in 2017 and Asia’s four democratic major powers — the United States, Japan, Australia and India — reconvened their quadrilateral security dialogue (the Quad), Southeast Asian countries have been wary of ASEAN losing its centrality in the regional political and economic order. The conceptual linkage of the two oceans and consequent expansion of geopolitical space was bound to have this effect to some extent. Moreover, the combination of four democratic major powers in a region largely home to single-party governments and authoritarian regimes raised the spectre of goals beyond the containment of China, or at least the containment of China through the creation of democratic transitions on its periphery — this was an argument the original boosters of the Quad in Washington had made in 2007. Finally, the overlaying of the Quad on the Indo-Pacific concept gave rise to fears of a return to Cold War–style containment, this time of China, and major-power politics rearing its ugly head yet again in Southeast Asia. Although these concerns are real and require a response from ASEAN, Southeast Asian countries can expect to find support from an unexpected quarter: India. When the Quad was originally proposed in 2007, diplomatic protest from China had caused India and Australia to roll back their commitments, and the initiative went into stasis after George W. Bush and Shinzo Abe subsequently left office. A decade later, as the Quad returns, Australia’s and China’s positions have changed but India’s remains the same. Canberra is now an enthusiastic supporter
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
向西看,向东行动:印度的印太战略
自2017年印太重新成为一个可行的战略概念,亚洲四个民主大国——美国、日本、澳大利亚和印度——重新召开四方安全对话以来,东南亚国家一直担心东盟失去其在地区政治和经济秩序中的中心地位。两大洋在概念上的联系以及随之而来的地缘政治空间的扩大必然会在某种程度上产生这种影响。此外,四个民主大国在一个主要由一党政府和专制政权组成的地区联合起来,提出了遏制中国之外的目标,或者至少是通过在其周边地区创造民主转型来遏制中国——这是华盛顿四方会谈最初的支持者在2007年提出的一个论点。最后,四方对话叠加在印太概念上,引发了人们对冷战式遏制回归的担忧,这一次是对中国的遏制,以及大国政治在东南亚再次抬头。尽管这些担忧是真实存在的,需要东盟作出回应,但东南亚国家可以期待从一个意想不到的地方得到支持:印度。四方对话最初于2007年提出时,中国的外交抗议导致印度和澳大利亚撤回了承诺,在乔治·w·布什(George W. Bush)和安倍晋三(Shinzo Abe)随后卸任后,该倡议陷入停滞。十年后,随着四方会谈的回归,澳大利亚和中国的立场发生了变化,但印度的立场仍未改变。堪培拉现在是热情的支持者
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Economic Outlook for Southeast Asia: From Containment to Recovery Brunei Darussalam in 2020: Enduring Stability of a Small Monarchical State in a Turbulent Year Cambodian Foreign Policy in 2020: Chinese Friends and American Foes? Malaysia in 2020: Political Fragmentation, Power Plays and Shifting Coalitions Vietnam’s Economic Prospects in the Wake of the US-China Trade Conflict and COVID-19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1