Agrobacterium cells as microprojectile coating: a novel approach to enhance stable transformation rates in strawberry

M. C. D. Mesa, Silvia Jiménez-Bermúdez, F. Pliego-Alfaro, M. Quesada, J. Mercado
{"title":"Agrobacterium cells as microprojectile coating: a novel approach to enhance stable transformation rates in strawberry","authors":"M. C. D. Mesa, Silvia Jiménez-Bermúdez, F. Pliego-Alfaro, M. Quesada, J. Mercado","doi":"10.1071/PP00025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The effect of combining Agrobacterium tumefaciens infection and biolistic bombardment on the transformation of strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) cv. Chandler, was evaluated. Bombarding leaf explants with uncoated gold particles followed by Agrobacterium infection did not improve transformation, and yielded similar percentages of shoot regeneration in the presence of kanamycin in bombarded and non-bombarded explants (7.2%). In a novel approximation, gold particles were coated with Agrobacterium cells and used to bombard leaf explants. Helium pressures of 4.5, 6.2 and 7.6 MPa and target distances of 3 and 9 cm were tested. An average of 96.2% of the explants showed β-glucuronidase (GUS) expression 15 d after bombardment, in comparison with 26.6% in explants bombarded with gold particles coated with the plasmid pGUSINT or 58.3% in non-bombarded Agrobacterium-infected explants. After 25 weeks of culture, the highest transformation frequency was obtained using a 6.2 MPa helium pressure and 3 cm target distance, yielding 69% kanamycin-resistant explants and a final transformation fre-quency of 20.7%. These values were 4.5 times higher for kanamycin-resistant explants (69% with biolistic vs 16% with Agrobacterium infection) and 2.9 times higher for transformation frequency (20.7 vs 7%,) compared with those obtained with standard Agrobacterium transformation procedures (Barcelo et al. 1998, Plant Cell, Tiss. Org. Cult. 54, 29–36). More than 15 independent transgenic plants obtained by the Agrobacterium-coated particle system were acclimatized and confirmed as transgenics by GUS activity and PCR. Segregation analysis of kanamycin resistance has been performed in seven independent lines, three of which contained a single insertion of the T-DNA.","PeriodicalId":8650,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Plant Physiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"31","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Plant Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/PP00025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31

Abstract

The effect of combining Agrobacterium tumefaciens infection and biolistic bombardment on the transformation of strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) cv. Chandler, was evaluated. Bombarding leaf explants with uncoated gold particles followed by Agrobacterium infection did not improve transformation, and yielded similar percentages of shoot regeneration in the presence of kanamycin in bombarded and non-bombarded explants (7.2%). In a novel approximation, gold particles were coated with Agrobacterium cells and used to bombard leaf explants. Helium pressures of 4.5, 6.2 and 7.6 MPa and target distances of 3 and 9 cm were tested. An average of 96.2% of the explants showed β-glucuronidase (GUS) expression 15 d after bombardment, in comparison with 26.6% in explants bombarded with gold particles coated with the plasmid pGUSINT or 58.3% in non-bombarded Agrobacterium-infected explants. After 25 weeks of culture, the highest transformation frequency was obtained using a 6.2 MPa helium pressure and 3 cm target distance, yielding 69% kanamycin-resistant explants and a final transformation fre-quency of 20.7%. These values were 4.5 times higher for kanamycin-resistant explants (69% with biolistic vs 16% with Agrobacterium infection) and 2.9 times higher for transformation frequency (20.7 vs 7%,) compared with those obtained with standard Agrobacterium transformation procedures (Barcelo et al. 1998, Plant Cell, Tiss. Org. Cult. 54, 29–36). More than 15 independent transgenic plants obtained by the Agrobacterium-coated particle system were acclimatized and confirmed as transgenics by GUS activity and PCR. Segregation analysis of kanamycin resistance has been performed in seven independent lines, three of which contained a single insertion of the T-DNA.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
农杆菌细胞微丸包被:一种提高草莓稳定转化率的新方法
农杆菌感染联合生物轰击对草莓(Fragaria × ananassa Duch.)转化的影响。钱德勒,被评估过。用未包被金颗粒轰击叶片外植体,然后再感染农杆菌,并没有改善转化,在卡那霉素存在的情况下,轰击和未轰击的外植体的茎再生百分比相似(7.2%)。在一种新颖的近似方法中,金颗粒被农杆菌细胞包裹,并用于轰击叶片外植体。氦气压力分别为4.5、6.2和7.6 MPa,靶距分别为3和9 cm。轰击15 d后,平均96.2%的外植体表达β-葡萄糖醛酸酶(GUS),而包被pGUSINT质粒的金颗粒轰击的外植体表达率为26.6%,未轰击农杆菌侵染的外植体表达率为58.3%。培养25周后,在6.2 MPa的氦压力和3 cm的靶距下,转化频率最高,获得69%的卡那霉素抗性外植体,最终转化频率为20.7%。与标准农杆菌转化程序相比,卡那霉素抗性外植体的这些值高出4.5倍(生物感染69%对农杆菌感染16%),转化频率高出2.9倍(20.7对7%)(Barcelo et al. 1998, Plant Cell, Tiss)。Org。Cult. 54,29 - 36)。农杆菌包被颗粒系统获得的15株独立转基因植株经GUS活性和PCR鉴定为转基因植株。对7个独立菌株进行了卡那霉素抗性分离分析,其中3个菌株含有单个T-DNA插入。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Different leaf surface characteristics of three grape cultivars affect leaf optical properties as measured with fibre optics: possible implication in stress tolerance Enhanced shoot regeneration in nine Australian wheat cultivars by spermidine and water stress treatments Effects of manipulation of pyruvate decarboxylase and alcohol dehydrogenase levels on the submergence tolerance of rice Plant water use efficiency of 17 Australian NAD-ME and NADP-ME C₄ grasses at ambient and elevated CO₂ partial pressure Localisation and expression of zeaxanthin epoxidase mRNA in Arabidopsis in response to drought stress and during seed development
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1