Cisplatin/pemetrexed chemotherapy versus palliative care survival in malignant pleural mesothelioma

Ivan Škopljanac, Ivana Šegrt, K. Miše, Emilija Lozo Vukovac, Anita Tolic Biocina
{"title":"Cisplatin/pemetrexed chemotherapy versus palliative care survival in malignant pleural mesothelioma","authors":"Ivan Škopljanac, Ivana Šegrt, K. Miše, Emilija Lozo Vukovac, Anita Tolic Biocina","doi":"10.1183/13993003.congress-2018.pa2894","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Malignant pleural mesothelioma is a rare tumour commonly associated with asbestos exposure however with increasing incidence and poor survival. The standard first-line chemotherapy regimen is the combination of cisplatin and pemetrexed, with median overall survival of 13 months. Other therapeutic options like surgery, radiation and immunotherapy are currently limited therefore patient s performance status and histological subtype are the only prognostic factors (Scherpereel A. et al. EurRespir J 2010;35: 479-95, Scherpereel A. EurRespir J.2017 Mar 15;49(3). Aim and Objectives: The aim of study was to compare the patient9s survival depending on whether they received chemotherapy or not. Methods: We identified retrospectively 24 patients diagnosed with pleural mesothelioma in Department of Pulmonology, Clinical Hospital Center Split, Croatia evaluating their management, whether they were treated by cisplatin/pemetrexed or solely palliative care as a result of poor performance status or refusal of any specific treatment. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used (MedCalc Software ver. 18). Results: The overall median survival (OS) time was 14,6 months. A pronounced OS benefit for palliative care versus cisplatin/pemetrexed was observed, 17 vs 8 months, respectively; HR, 0,3665 ; 95% CI, 0,14 to 0,90 ; P = 0,0047, Fig. 1. Conclusions: Chemotherapeutic treatment did not show better outcomes than solely palliative treatment. Future prospective randomized controlled studies are necessary to optimize the treatment of malignant mesothelioma.","PeriodicalId":20113,"journal":{"name":"Pleural and Mediastinal Malignancies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pleural and Mediastinal Malignancies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2018.pa2894","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Malignant pleural mesothelioma is a rare tumour commonly associated with asbestos exposure however with increasing incidence and poor survival. The standard first-line chemotherapy regimen is the combination of cisplatin and pemetrexed, with median overall survival of 13 months. Other therapeutic options like surgery, radiation and immunotherapy are currently limited therefore patient s performance status and histological subtype are the only prognostic factors (Scherpereel A. et al. EurRespir J 2010;35: 479-95, Scherpereel A. EurRespir J.2017 Mar 15;49(3). Aim and Objectives: The aim of study was to compare the patient9s survival depending on whether they received chemotherapy or not. Methods: We identified retrospectively 24 patients diagnosed with pleural mesothelioma in Department of Pulmonology, Clinical Hospital Center Split, Croatia evaluating their management, whether they were treated by cisplatin/pemetrexed or solely palliative care as a result of poor performance status or refusal of any specific treatment. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used (MedCalc Software ver. 18). Results: The overall median survival (OS) time was 14,6 months. A pronounced OS benefit for palliative care versus cisplatin/pemetrexed was observed, 17 vs 8 months, respectively; HR, 0,3665 ; 95% CI, 0,14 to 0,90 ; P = 0,0047, Fig. 1. Conclusions: Chemotherapeutic treatment did not show better outcomes than solely palliative treatment. Future prospective randomized controlled studies are necessary to optimize the treatment of malignant mesothelioma.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
顺铂/培美曲塞化疗对恶性胸膜间皮瘤姑息治疗生存率的影响
恶性胸膜间皮瘤是一种罕见的肿瘤,通常与石棉暴露有关,但发病率上升,生存率低。标准的一线化疗方案是顺铂联合培美曲塞,中位总生存期为13个月。其他治疗选择,如手术、放疗和免疫治疗目前有限,因此患者的运动状态和组织学亚型是唯一的预后因素(Scherpereel A. et al.)。张建军,张建军。中国生物医学工程学报,2010;35:479-95。目的和目的:研究的目的是比较患者是否接受化疗的生存率。方法:我们回顾性分析了24例在克罗地亚斯普利特临床医院中心肺病科诊断为胸膜间皮瘤的患者,评估了他们的治疗情况,无论他们是由于表现不佳或拒绝任何特定治疗而接受顺铂/培美曲塞治疗还是单纯姑息治疗。采用Kaplan-Meier生存分析(MedCalc Software ver.)。18)。结果:总中位生存期(OS)为14.6个月。与顺铂/培美曲塞相比,姑息治疗的OS获益明显,分别为17个月和8个月;Hr, 0,3665;95% CI为0.14 ~ 0.90;P = 0.0047,图1。结论:化疗并不比单纯姑息治疗有更好的预后。未来有必要进行前瞻性随机对照研究,以优化恶性间皮瘤的治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparing the Success Rate of Pleurodesis with Thoracoscopic Talc Poudrage Combined with Indwelling Pleural Catheter versus Thoracoscopic Talc Poudrage in Patient with Malignant Pleural Effusion, A Randomized, Non-inferiority Clinical Trial Patient derived malignant pleural effusion cell cultures as a platform to understand pleural malignancies and advance personalised treatment Variation in outcomes for M1a Stage Lung cacers- Outcome in Malingnat Pleural Effusion significantly worse than patients with Contralateral Lung Nodules Primary cilium modulates mesothelioma cell viability and 3D sphere formation Intracavitary anaesthesia for medical thoracoscopy: a randomised trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1