[Percutaneous neuromodulation with pulsating radiofrequency vs cryoablation for the treatment of patients with lumbar facet syndrome].

Acta ortopedica mexicana Pub Date : 2022-05-01
L F González-Ramos, E H Hermida-Ochoa, D Benavides-Rodríguez, J C Hermida-Ochoa
{"title":"[Percutaneous neuromodulation with pulsating radiofrequency vs cryoablation for the treatment of patients with lumbar facet syndrome].","authors":"L F González-Ramos,&nbsp;E H Hermida-Ochoa,&nbsp;D Benavides-Rodríguez,&nbsp;J C Hermida-Ochoa","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>lumbar spine pain affects a high percentage of the population and has a significant socioeconomic impact. Lumbar facet syndrome has a prevalence between 15-31% with lifetime incidence of up to 52% in some series. Due to the use of different types of treatment and different patient selection criteria, the success rate varies in the literature.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>to compare results of treatment with rhizolysis applying pulsed radiofrequency versus cryoablation in patients diagnosed with lumbar facet syndrome.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>from January 2019 to November 2019, eight patients were randomly divided into two groups: group A treated with pulsed radiofrequency and group B treated with cryoablation. Pain was assessed with the visual analogue scale and the Oswestry low back pain disability index at four weeks, in addition to three and six months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>follow-up was six months. Immediately the eight patients (100%) reported improvement in symptoms and pain. Of the four patients who were in intense functional limitation, one of them became without functional limitation, and two of them went to minimum functional limitation and one to moderate functional limitation at the first month, statistically significant differences were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>both treatments control pain in the short term; there is also an improvement in physical abilities. The morbidity accompanying neurolysis either radiofrequency or cryoablation is very low.</p>","PeriodicalId":7081,"journal":{"name":"Acta ortopedica mexicana","volume":"36 3","pages":"152-158"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta ortopedica mexicana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: lumbar spine pain affects a high percentage of the population and has a significant socioeconomic impact. Lumbar facet syndrome has a prevalence between 15-31% with lifetime incidence of up to 52% in some series. Due to the use of different types of treatment and different patient selection criteria, the success rate varies in the literature.

Objective: to compare results of treatment with rhizolysis applying pulsed radiofrequency versus cryoablation in patients diagnosed with lumbar facet syndrome.

Material and methods: from January 2019 to November 2019, eight patients were randomly divided into two groups: group A treated with pulsed radiofrequency and group B treated with cryoablation. Pain was assessed with the visual analogue scale and the Oswestry low back pain disability index at four weeks, in addition to three and six months.

Results: follow-up was six months. Immediately the eight patients (100%) reported improvement in symptoms and pain. Of the four patients who were in intense functional limitation, one of them became without functional limitation, and two of them went to minimum functional limitation and one to moderate functional limitation at the first month, statistically significant differences were reported.

Conclusions: both treatments control pain in the short term; there is also an improvement in physical abilities. The morbidity accompanying neurolysis either radiofrequency or cryoablation is very low.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[经皮脉冲射频神经调节与冷冻消融治疗腰椎关节突综合征患者]。
导读:腰椎疼痛影响很大比例的人群,并具有显著的社会经济影响。腰椎关节突综合征的患病率在15-31%之间,某些系列的终生发病率高达52%。由于使用不同的治疗类型和不同的患者选择标准,成功率在文献中有所不同。目的:比较脉冲射频根茎松解与冷冻消融治疗腰椎关节突综合征的疗效。材料与方法:2019年1月至2019年11月,8例患者随机分为两组:A组采用脉冲射频治疗,B组采用冷冻消融治疗。在第四周、第3个月和第6个月时,用视觉模拟量表和Oswestry腰痛残疾指数对疼痛进行评估。结果:随访6个月。8名患者(100%)立即报告症状和疼痛改善。在4例重度功能限制患者中,1例患者在第一个月无功能限制,2例患者达到轻度功能限制,1例患者达到中度功能限制,差异有统计学意义。结论:两种治疗方法均能短期控制疼痛;身体能力也有所提高。伴随神经松解术的发病率无论是射频还是冷冻消融都很低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Functional results after shoulder hemiarthroplasty for proximal humerus fracture: experience in our center]. [Impact of the nail diameter on consolidation of tibial diaphyseal fractures. Retrospective analysis of 96 patients]. Evaluation and management of osteochondral lesions of the talus in skeletally immature patients. What is the degree of variability in formal training for pediatric orthopedic surgeons performing scoliosis surgery? [Surgical wound dehiscence and exposed hardware. Infection foretold?]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1