Toward Abiozoomorphism in Social Robotics? Discussion of a New Category between Mechanical Entities and Living Beings

IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Posthuman Studies-Philosophy Technology Media Pub Date : 2021-12-01 DOI:10.5325/jpoststud.5.2.0150
Jaana Parviainen, Tuuli Turja
{"title":"Toward Abiozoomorphism in Social Robotics? Discussion of a New Category between Mechanical Entities and Living Beings","authors":"Jaana Parviainen, Tuuli Turja","doi":"10.5325/jpoststud.5.2.0150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Social robotics designed to enhance anthropomorphism and zoomorphism seeks to evoke feelings of empathy and other positive emotions in humans. While it is difficult to treat these machines as mere artefacts, the simulated lifelike qualities of robots easily lead to misunderstandings that the machines could be intentional. In this post-anthropocentrically positioned article, we look for a solution to the dilemma by developing a novel concept, “abiozoomorphism.” Drawing on Donna Haraway’s conceptualization of companion species, we address critical aspects of why robots should not be categorized with animals by showing that the distinction between nonliving beings and living beings is still valid. In our phenomenologically informed approach to social robotics, we propose that the concept of abiozoomorphism makes it possible to transcend the strong ethos of biotism that prevails in both robot design and academic research on social robots.","PeriodicalId":55935,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Posthuman Studies-Philosophy Technology Media","volume":"148 1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Posthuman Studies-Philosophy Technology Media","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/jpoststud.5.2.0150","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Social robotics designed to enhance anthropomorphism and zoomorphism seeks to evoke feelings of empathy and other positive emotions in humans. While it is difficult to treat these machines as mere artefacts, the simulated lifelike qualities of robots easily lead to misunderstandings that the machines could be intentional. In this post-anthropocentrically positioned article, we look for a solution to the dilemma by developing a novel concept, “abiozoomorphism.” Drawing on Donna Haraway’s conceptualization of companion species, we address critical aspects of why robots should not be categorized with animals by showing that the distinction between nonliving beings and living beings is still valid. In our phenomenologically informed approach to social robotics, we propose that the concept of abiozoomorphism makes it possible to transcend the strong ethos of biotism that prevails in both robot design and academic research on social robots.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
走向社会机器人的非生物形态?机械实体与生物新范畴的探讨
社交机器人旨在增强拟人化和动物拟人化,旨在唤起人类的同理心和其他积极情绪。虽然很难将这些机器仅仅视为人工制品,但机器人模拟的逼真品质很容易导致误解,认为这些机器可能是有意的。在这篇以后人类中心主义为定位的文章中,我们通过发展一个新的概念“非生物形态”来寻找解决这一困境的方法。借鉴Donna Haraway的伴侣物种概念,我们通过展示非生物和生物之间的区别仍然有效,解决了为什么机器人不应该与动物分类的关键方面。在我们对社交机器人的现象学研究中,我们提出,非生物形态的概念使其有可能超越在机器人设计和社交机器人学术研究中普遍存在的强烈的生物主义精神。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Digital Salvation as a Gift: A Catholic Understanding of Digital Salvation in Contrast to Kurzweilian Transhumanism From Dasein to the Posthuman, Or toward a Rhizomatic-Coexistence-in-an-Open-World Philosophy of Posthuman Art, by Stefan Lorenz Sorgner The Parasitic Speedrun: Super Mario 64, Noise, and the Cosmic Glitch Toward Posthumanism: Stigmatization of Artificial Intelligence in American Science Fiction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1