Apical preparation size after repetitive pecking to the working length using different endodontic file systems

IF 0.5 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Giornale Italiano di Endodonzia Pub Date : 2018-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.gien.2018.09.003
Tousif Iqbal Nathani , Aatif Iqbal Nathani , Ankur Mahesh Banode , Moez Ismail Khakiani , Juan Gonzalo Olivieri Fernandez , Fernando Durán-Sindreu Terol , Francesc Abella Sans
{"title":"Apical preparation size after repetitive pecking to the working length using different endodontic file systems","authors":"Tousif Iqbal Nathani ,&nbsp;Aatif Iqbal Nathani ,&nbsp;Ankur Mahesh Banode ,&nbsp;Moez Ismail Khakiani ,&nbsp;Juan Gonzalo Olivieri Fernandez ,&nbsp;Fernando Durán-Sindreu Terol ,&nbsp;Francesc Abella Sans","doi":"10.1016/j.gien.2018.09.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><p>The purpose of this study was to determine and evaluate the apical preparation size resulting from different pecking times to the working length (WL) with five different file systems.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Fifty standard simulated endodontic J-shaped blocks were instrumented using ProTaper NEXT (PTN), WaveOne (WO), WaveOne Gold (WOG), OneShape (OS) and the Self-Adjusting File (SAF) (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->10) with different pecking times (1, 2 and 4) to the WL. For the SAF group, instrumentation was done till WL according to the time, i.e. 1, 3 and 4<!--> <!-->min. On completion of each stage, silicone impression material was used to take canal impressions for comparison and evaluation of the apical size preparation, using a stereomicroscope. Two-way analysis of variance was applied to determine differences between groups and pecking times.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>After four pecking times, a significant increase was observed in the apical diameter of four test groups compared to SAF (<em>P</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.05), which was not associated with increased apical preparation at all times.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>A greater apical enlargement occurs with increasing pecking times; however, SAF instrumentation exhibits the minimum changes in the apical preparation after 1, 3 and 4<!--> <!-->min. WO, WOG and OS are able to prepare the apical size similar to their tip at a single peck to the WL.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":42221,"journal":{"name":"Giornale Italiano di Endodonzia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.gien.2018.09.003","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Giornale Italiano di Endodonzia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1121417118300487","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Aim

The purpose of this study was to determine and evaluate the apical preparation size resulting from different pecking times to the working length (WL) with five different file systems.

Materials and methods

Fifty standard simulated endodontic J-shaped blocks were instrumented using ProTaper NEXT (PTN), WaveOne (WO), WaveOne Gold (WOG), OneShape (OS) and the Self-Adjusting File (SAF) (n = 10) with different pecking times (1, 2 and 4) to the WL. For the SAF group, instrumentation was done till WL according to the time, i.e. 1, 3 and 4 min. On completion of each stage, silicone impression material was used to take canal impressions for comparison and evaluation of the apical size preparation, using a stereomicroscope. Two-way analysis of variance was applied to determine differences between groups and pecking times.

Results

After four pecking times, a significant increase was observed in the apical diameter of four test groups compared to SAF (P < 0.05), which was not associated with increased apical preparation at all times.

Conclusion

A greater apical enlargement occurs with increasing pecking times; however, SAF instrumentation exhibits the minimum changes in the apical preparation after 1, 3 and 4 min. WO, WOG and OS are able to prepare the apical size similar to their tip at a single peck to the WL.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用不同的根管文件系统,重复啄尖后的根尖准备尺寸达到工作长度
目的研究五种不同的文件系统下,不同的啄取次数对工作长度(WL)的影响,从而确定和评价不同的根尖准备尺寸。材料与方法采用ProTaper NEXT (PTN)、WaveOne (WO)、WaveOne Gold (WOG)、OneShape (OS)和self - adjustment File (SAF) (n = 10)对50个标准的模拟牙根j型牙块进行固定,分别对牙周进行不同次数(1、2、4次)的磨合。对于SAF组,根据时间,即1分钟、3分钟和4分钟,进行器械固定至WL。在每个阶段完成后,使用硅胶印模材料进行管腔印模,以比较和评估根尖大小准备,使用体视显微镜。采用双向方差分析来确定组间和啄食时间的差异。结果经过4次啄食后,4个实验组的根尖直径均较SAF (P <0.05),这与任何时候根尖准备的增加无关。结论随着啄食次数的增加,根尖增大越大;然而,SAF仪器在1分钟、3分钟和4分钟后,顶端准备的变化最小。WO、WOG和OS能够在单次轻触WL时准备与其尖端相似的顶端大小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Giornale Italiano di Endodonzia
Giornale Italiano di Endodonzia DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
25.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Giornale Italiano di Endodonzia was founded in 1987 and is the official journal of the Italian Society of Endodontics (SIE). It is a peer-reviewed journal publishing original articles on clinical research and/or clinical methodology, case reports related to Endodontics. The Journal evaluates also contributes in restorative dentistry, dental traumatology, experimental pathophysiology, pharmacology and microbiology dealing with Endodontics.
期刊最新文献
Comparative efficacy of Depotphoresis and diode laser for reduction of microbial load and postoperative pain, and healing of periapical lesions: a randomized clinical trial Endodontics: clinical protocols on scientific basis Anatomical proximity of upper teeth and local factors associated with the thickness of the maxillary sinus membrane: a retrospective study A contemporary approach to treat necrotic immature teeth using different bioceramic materials Endodontic guides and ultrasonic tips for management of calcifications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1