Holistic Sand Management in Malaysia Assets; Successful Case Studies and Lessons Learnt

Zulkifli B M Zin, Jennyfer Joseph Kuanji, Nik Zarina Bt Nik Khansani
{"title":"Holistic Sand Management in Malaysia Assets; Successful Case Studies and Lessons Learnt","authors":"Zulkifli B M Zin, Jennyfer Joseph Kuanji, Nik Zarina Bt Nik Khansani","doi":"10.4043/31370-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Sand production is a common issue, especially in a depleting field as water production commences, and sand strength weakens. Conventional sand management focuses on downhole sand exclusion from the wellbore either through completion design or production reduction by choke optimisation as passive sand control.\n The objective of the paper is to share the company's journey in sand management in collaboration of various supporting units.\n The Holistic Sand Management methodological process adopts a 5 keys action plan, namely:\n Establishment of dedicated focus sand team with multidisciplinary support covering surface and subsurface activities Situational Assessment to develop baseline in sand management preparedness in each field, identifying gaps and developing an intervention plan Development and utilisation of an in-house erosion prediction tool, Continuous upskilling in sand management best practices, and Technology review and active pilot testing utilising digital enhancement to assist in sand management activities.\n Establishment of a dedicated and collaborative focus group, Integrated Sand Management (ISM) team in the centre which is replicated at the region as Regional Sand Team (RST), has allowed for continuous communication on sand management matters. Situational Assessment consists of 13 integrated subsurface and surface elements to evaluate a field capability to manage sand production. These 13 elements include sand management philosophy and organisation setup, sand prediction, sand control design, sand sampling and monitoring as well as surface sand handling and disposal. Findings from the assessment are used to gauge the field's readiness and ability to manage sand operation and develop gaps closure plan to achieve the optimum holistic sand management. The Sand Erosional and Transportation (SET) tool, an in-house developed tool, is used to evaluate sand erosion and deposition risk in the production system. The tool is used extensively to generate a safe operating envelope for sand producing well during open-up and continuous production. This has allowed the company to shift from limiting production up to a specific sand concentration to erosion risk-based approach, which in turn creates production optimization opportunities. Regular and continuous upskilling sessions ensure the frontline operations are updated and abreast with best practices in sand management. In addition, the ISM team reviews and leverages on latest technology, actively organises pilot test at a selected site supported with digital enhancement to assist in sand management activities. The application of a Holistic Sand Management methodology is seen to reduce erosion related Loss of Primary Containment (LOPC), sustain production, and minimise unplanned deferment. However, this is just the beginning and the battle in sand operation will continue to be very challenging in balancing between production while ensuring asset integrity.\n The methodology is a novel approach for the company with the formation of a dedicated and collaborative team spearheading sand management initiatives which include situation assessment for gaps identification supported by in-house erosion modelling tool.","PeriodicalId":11011,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Thu, March 24, 2022","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Thu, March 24, 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4043/31370-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sand production is a common issue, especially in a depleting field as water production commences, and sand strength weakens. Conventional sand management focuses on downhole sand exclusion from the wellbore either through completion design or production reduction by choke optimisation as passive sand control. The objective of the paper is to share the company's journey in sand management in collaboration of various supporting units. The Holistic Sand Management methodological process adopts a 5 keys action plan, namely: Establishment of dedicated focus sand team with multidisciplinary support covering surface and subsurface activities Situational Assessment to develop baseline in sand management preparedness in each field, identifying gaps and developing an intervention plan Development and utilisation of an in-house erosion prediction tool, Continuous upskilling in sand management best practices, and Technology review and active pilot testing utilising digital enhancement to assist in sand management activities. Establishment of a dedicated and collaborative focus group, Integrated Sand Management (ISM) team in the centre which is replicated at the region as Regional Sand Team (RST), has allowed for continuous communication on sand management matters. Situational Assessment consists of 13 integrated subsurface and surface elements to evaluate a field capability to manage sand production. These 13 elements include sand management philosophy and organisation setup, sand prediction, sand control design, sand sampling and monitoring as well as surface sand handling and disposal. Findings from the assessment are used to gauge the field's readiness and ability to manage sand operation and develop gaps closure plan to achieve the optimum holistic sand management. The Sand Erosional and Transportation (SET) tool, an in-house developed tool, is used to evaluate sand erosion and deposition risk in the production system. The tool is used extensively to generate a safe operating envelope for sand producing well during open-up and continuous production. This has allowed the company to shift from limiting production up to a specific sand concentration to erosion risk-based approach, which in turn creates production optimization opportunities. Regular and continuous upskilling sessions ensure the frontline operations are updated and abreast with best practices in sand management. In addition, the ISM team reviews and leverages on latest technology, actively organises pilot test at a selected site supported with digital enhancement to assist in sand management activities. The application of a Holistic Sand Management methodology is seen to reduce erosion related Loss of Primary Containment (LOPC), sustain production, and minimise unplanned deferment. However, this is just the beginning and the battle in sand operation will continue to be very challenging in balancing between production while ensuring asset integrity. The methodology is a novel approach for the company with the formation of a dedicated and collaborative team spearheading sand management initiatives which include situation assessment for gaps identification supported by in-house erosion modelling tool.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
马来西亚资产的整体防砂管理成功案例研究及经验教训
出砂是一个常见的问题,特别是在枯竭油田,随着采水开始,砂的强度减弱。传统的防砂管理侧重于通过完井设计或通过节流优化来减少产量,即被动防砂。本文的目的是在各个支持单位的协作下分享公司在治沙方面的历程。整体治沙方法过程采用5项关键行动计划,即:建立专门的重点防砂团队,提供覆盖地面和地下活动的多学科支持,对每个油田进行态势评估,制定防砂准备基线,确定差距并制定干预计划。开发和利用内部侵蚀预测工具,不断提高防砂管理最佳实践技能。利用数字增强技术进行技术审查和积极的试点测试,以协助防砂活动。中心成立了一个专门的协作焦点小组,即综合防砂小组(ISM),该小组在该地区作为区域防砂小组(RST)复制,以便就防砂问题进行持续沟通。情景评估包括13个综合的地下和地面元素,以评估油田管理出砂的能力。这13个要素包括砂管理理念和组织设置、砂预测、防砂设计、砂取样和监测以及地面砂处理和处置。评估结果用于评估油田的准备情况和管理出砂作业的能力,并制定缺口关闭计划,以实现最佳的整体出砂管理。砂蚀与运移(SET)工具是公司内部开发的工具,用于评估生产系统中的砂蚀与沉积风险。该工具在开井和连续生产过程中广泛应用于出砂井的安全作业包层。这使得公司能够从限制生产到特定的砂浓度,转变为基于侵蚀风险的方法,从而创造了生产优化的机会。定期和持续的技能提升课程确保前线作业与砂管理的最佳实践保持同步。此外,ISM团队审查并利用最新技术,在选定的地点积极组织试点测试,并支持数字增强,以协助防砂活动。整体防砂方法的应用可以减少与侵蚀相关的初级密封层损失(LOPC),维持生产,并最大限度地减少计划外延迟。然而,这仅仅是一个开始,在确保资产完整性的同时平衡产量,砂石作业的战斗将继续非常具有挑战性。该方法对公司来说是一种新颖的方法,公司组建了一个专门的协作团队,带头进行砂管理计划,其中包括由内部侵蚀建模工具支持的缺口识别情况评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Integrated Advance Petrophysical Evaluation for Heterolithic Clastics Reservoir Characterization Optimization in Malay Basin The Transformation Journey and Key Critical Success Factors of Turbomachinery Digital Remote Monitoring Biggest Wells Plug and Abandonment Campaign – Effective Management & Best Practices Implementation Zawtika Deferment Management Enhancement: A Systematic Way to Unlock Gas Potential for Optimized Operations Breakthrough Integration of 3-1/2? Tubing in 8-1/2? Hole Cemented Monobore for Successful Tubing Stem Test TST
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1