Why Great New Products Fail

IF 4 4区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS Mit Sloan Management Review Pub Date : 2016-03-01 DOI:10.13007/601
D. Simester
{"title":"Why Great New Products Fail","authors":"D. Simester","doi":"10.13007/601","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A recent study of almost 9,000 new products that achieved broad distribution at a national retailer revealed that just 40% of them were still sold three years later. Companies generally focus primarily on creating value without enough regard to whether customers will recognize this value. For a customer, the perceived benefit of searching for a better solution may not be the same as the actual benefit, particularly in markets with little recent innovation. The most common cues people use to infer product quality are price and brand. In many circumstances, the more effectively customers can search, the less they will rely on the brand. Moreover, their perceptions of the brand will change quickly as new information comes in. Both factors diminish the importance of the brand. However, in markets where customers cannot search easily and effectively, they are forced to use the brand to make purchasing decisions. The role of the brand may vary across product features.","PeriodicalId":48169,"journal":{"name":"Mit Sloan Management Review","volume":"54 1","pages":"33-39"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mit Sloan Management Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13007/601","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

A recent study of almost 9,000 new products that achieved broad distribution at a national retailer revealed that just 40% of them were still sold three years later. Companies generally focus primarily on creating value without enough regard to whether customers will recognize this value. For a customer, the perceived benefit of searching for a better solution may not be the same as the actual benefit, particularly in markets with little recent innovation. The most common cues people use to infer product quality are price and brand. In many circumstances, the more effectively customers can search, the less they will rely on the brand. Moreover, their perceptions of the brand will change quickly as new information comes in. Both factors diminish the importance of the brand. However, in markets where customers cannot search easily and effectively, they are forced to use the brand to make purchasing decisions. The role of the brand may vary across product features.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为什么伟大的新产品会失败
最近的一项研究显示,在一家全国性零售商广泛销售的近9000种新产品中,只有40%的产品在三年后仍在销售。公司通常主要关注的是创造价值,而没有足够的考虑客户是否会认可这个价值。对于客户来说,寻找更好的解决方案的感知利益可能与实际利益不同,特别是在最近几乎没有创新的市场中。人们用来推断产品质量的最常见的线索是价格和品牌。在很多情况下,顾客搜索得越有效,他们对品牌的依赖就越少。此外,随着新信息的进入,他们对品牌的看法会迅速改变。这两个因素都降低了品牌的重要性。然而,在消费者无法轻松有效地搜索的市场中,他们被迫使用品牌来做出购买决策。品牌的作用可能因产品特性而异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
2.40%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Work without Jobs How to Sustain Your Organization's Culture When Everyone Is Remote Leisure Is Our Killer App Creating Better Innovation Measurement Practices Is your company ready for HR analytics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1