Service innovation or collaborative tradition? Public motives for partnerships with third sector organisations

IF 2.4 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Accounting and Organizational Change Pub Date : 2020-10-26 DOI:10.1108/jaoc-09-2020-0133
Caroline Hellström
{"title":"Service innovation or collaborative tradition? Public motives for partnerships with third sector organisations","authors":"Caroline Hellström","doi":"10.1108/jaoc-09-2020-0133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this paper is to investigate public partners’ motives for seeking and/or accepting partnerships with third sector organisations.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe approach is to seek to identify and explain motives from different perspectives; as responses to government failure or voluntary failure, as related to governance structures, and/or as driven by resource dependencies. The empirical material was gathered through semi-structured interviews with public employees in Swedish municipalities. The aim of the interviews was to grasp the public partners’ motives for partnerships with third sector organisations. Each interview started with questions on the presence and forms of partnerships, thus creating a backdrop for the motives, both during the interview and as a map of the partnership landscape.\n\n\nFindings\nThe most prominent motives for public engagement in partnerships with third sector organisations are related to democratic values, the need to solve concrete problems, and economic rationality. The motives vary with the type of partnership of which there is considerable variation in scale, content and contribution; the types of partnership vary with different policy fields and services. Different perspectives highlight different motives but none of them excludes other perspectives.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe main contribution of the paper is the empirically based findings of a multi-layered public–third sector partnership landscape where policy fields, forms and complex motives are intertwined.\n","PeriodicalId":46141,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting and Organizational Change","volume":"149 6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Accounting and Organizational Change","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jaoc-09-2020-0133","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate public partners’ motives for seeking and/or accepting partnerships with third sector organisations. Design/methodology/approach The approach is to seek to identify and explain motives from different perspectives; as responses to government failure or voluntary failure, as related to governance structures, and/or as driven by resource dependencies. The empirical material was gathered through semi-structured interviews with public employees in Swedish municipalities. The aim of the interviews was to grasp the public partners’ motives for partnerships with third sector organisations. Each interview started with questions on the presence and forms of partnerships, thus creating a backdrop for the motives, both during the interview and as a map of the partnership landscape. Findings The most prominent motives for public engagement in partnerships with third sector organisations are related to democratic values, the need to solve concrete problems, and economic rationality. The motives vary with the type of partnership of which there is considerable variation in scale, content and contribution; the types of partnership vary with different policy fields and services. Different perspectives highlight different motives but none of them excludes other perspectives. Originality/value The main contribution of the paper is the empirically based findings of a multi-layered public–third sector partnership landscape where policy fields, forms and complex motives are intertwined.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
服务创新还是合作传统?公众与第三部门机构合作的动机
本文的目的是调查公共合作伙伴寻求和/或接受与第三部门机构合作的动机。设计/方法论/方法方法是寻求从不同的角度识别和解释动机;作为对政府失败或自愿失败的回应,与治理结构有关,和/或由资源依赖驱动。经验材料是通过对瑞典市政当局的公共雇员进行半结构化访谈收集的。访谈的目的是了解公营机构与第三界别机构合作的动机。每次采访都以关于合作伙伴关系的存在和形式的问题开始,从而在采访过程中为动机创造一个背景,并作为合作伙伴关系景观的地图。公众参与与第三部门组织合作的最突出动机与民主价值观、解决具体问题的需要以及经济合理性有关。合作的动机因合作类型的不同而不同,在规模、内容和贡献上有较大差异;伙伴关系的类型因政策领域和服务的不同而不同。不同的观点强调不同的动机,但没有一个观点排斥其他观点。本文的主要贡献是基于经验的多层公共-第三部门伙伴关系格局的发现,其中政策领域、形式和复杂动机交织在一起。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
15.80%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: The main objective of the journal is to provide a platform for researchers and practitioners from multiple disciplines to disseminate information on organizational and accounting systems change. To achieve this, the journal will be directed at mapping out contemporary changes in the new global business environment. It will seek to explain the new techniques, processes, and philosophies associated with the rise of strategy-oriented accounting and information systems.
期刊最新文献
Show me? Inspire me? Make me? An institutional theory exploration of social and environmental reporting practices Toward an epistemology for anarchist accounting and stakeholder relationship capability: evidence from Iran Does the Directive of the European Union on disclosure of non-financial and diversity information improve reporting? Corporate reporting on the Sustainable Development Goals: a structured literature review and research agenda Value for money (VFM) in private finance initiative (PFI) implementation in Malaysia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1