Thermodynamic Performance Comparison of Single-pressure and Dual-pressure Evaporation Organic Rankine Cycles Using R1234ze(E)

Jian Li, Qiang Liu, Zhen Yang, Z. Ge, Y. Duan
{"title":"Thermodynamic Performance Comparison of Single-pressure and Dual-pressure Evaporation Organic Rankine Cycles Using R1234ze(E)","authors":"Jian Li, Qiang Liu, Zhen Yang, Z. Ge, Y. Duan","doi":"10.1109/ICGEA.2018.8356280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The organic Rankine cycle (ORC) presents a great potential in the efficient heat–power conversion of low and medium temperature (<350°C) thermal energy. Dual-pressure evaporation ORCs can significantly reduce the exergy loss in the endothermic process. While, variations of optimal cycle parameters and the superiority in the thermodynamic performance compared with the single-pressure evaporation ORC remain indeterminate for various heat source temperatures. This paper focuses on the dual-pressure evaporation ORC using R1234ze(E) driven by the 100–200°C heat sources without the outlet temperature limit. Two-stage evaporation pressures and the high-pressure evaporator outlet temperature were optimized, and the system thermodynamic performance was compared with that of the single-pressure evaporation ORC. Results show that the maximum net power output of the dual-pressure evaporation ORC system is generally larger than that of the single-pressure evaporation ORC system for the heat source temperature below 150°C. The heat source temperature is lower, the increment of the maximum net power output is generally larger; and the maximum increment is 24.3%. When the endothermic process minimal temperature difference of the single-pressure evaporation ORC occurs at the evaporation bubble point, the dual-pressure evaporation ORC generally can further increase the system net power output.","PeriodicalId":6536,"journal":{"name":"2018 2nd International Conference on Green Energy and Applications (ICGEA)","volume":"49 1","pages":"238-244"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 2nd International Conference on Green Energy and Applications (ICGEA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICGEA.2018.8356280","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The organic Rankine cycle (ORC) presents a great potential in the efficient heat–power conversion of low and medium temperature (<350°C) thermal energy. Dual-pressure evaporation ORCs can significantly reduce the exergy loss in the endothermic process. While, variations of optimal cycle parameters and the superiority in the thermodynamic performance compared with the single-pressure evaporation ORC remain indeterminate for various heat source temperatures. This paper focuses on the dual-pressure evaporation ORC using R1234ze(E) driven by the 100–200°C heat sources without the outlet temperature limit. Two-stage evaporation pressures and the high-pressure evaporator outlet temperature were optimized, and the system thermodynamic performance was compared with that of the single-pressure evaporation ORC. Results show that the maximum net power output of the dual-pressure evaporation ORC system is generally larger than that of the single-pressure evaporation ORC system for the heat source temperature below 150°C. The heat source temperature is lower, the increment of the maximum net power output is generally larger; and the maximum increment is 24.3%. When the endothermic process minimal temperature difference of the single-pressure evaporation ORC occurs at the evaporation bubble point, the dual-pressure evaporation ORC generally can further increase the system net power output.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
R1234ze(E)单压与双压蒸发有机朗肯循环热力学性能比较
有机朗肯循环(ORC)在中低温(<350°C)热能的高效热-电转换方面具有很大的潜力。双压蒸发ORCs可以显著降低吸热过程中的火用损失。而在不同热源温度下,最优循环参数的变化以及与单压力蒸发ORC相比的热力学性能优势仍然不确定。本文研究了采用R1234ze(E)的双压蒸发ORC,由100-200℃无出口温度限制的热源驱动。优化了两级蒸发压力和高压蒸发器出口温度,并与单压蒸发ORC进行了热力性能比较。结果表明:当热源温度低于150℃时,双压蒸发ORC系统的最大净输出功率普遍大于单压蒸发ORC系统;热源温度越低,最大净功率输出增量一般越大;最大增幅为24.3%。当单压蒸发ORC吸热过程最小温差出现在蒸发泡点时,双压蒸发ORC一般可进一步提高系统净功率输出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Experimental and CFD Analysis of Solar Air Heater with Rectangular Shaped Hollow Bodies Experimental Analysis of Glazed Windows for Green Buildings Monitoring System for Solar Panel Using Smartphone Based on Microcontroller Size-Selective Adsorption in Separation of Products from Pyrogallol and Methyl Linoleate Oxidative Coupling Reaction Integrated Water Cycle Management System for Smart Cities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1