Early Indicators That Universal Screening for Social Risk Factors Is Essential in the Perinatal Period [ID: 1381099]

Hayley Rogovin, H. Arem, T. Auguste, Christine Laccay, L. Patchen, Angela Thomas
{"title":"Early Indicators That Universal Screening for Social Risk Factors Is Essential in the Perinatal Period [ID: 1381099]","authors":"Hayley Rogovin, H. Arem, T. Auguste, Christine Laccay, L. Patchen, Angela Thomas","doi":"10.1097/01.aog.0000930996.24850.1a","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION: The District of Columbia has one of the highest maternal mortality rates in the United States. It is estimated that clinical factors account for 20% of health outcomes; the remaining 80% are attributable to other factors including social determinants of health (SDOH). This quality improvement project aims to examine the effectiveness of utilizing screening tools to identify social risk factors during the perinatal period. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of birthing individuals who completed our SDOH screening tool between April 1, 2021, and March 31, 2022. There were 1,106 birthing individuals screened. Social determinants of health were divided into seven risk categories: food insecurity, housing conditions, transportation, safety, legal, finance, and social support. Occurrences of each risk category were analyzed and compared for those who screened at both the pregnancy and postpartum stages. RESULTS: Of the 1,106 patients screened, 72% of the patients screened positive by reporting at least one social risk factor. Of those who screened positive, 81% requested general support. The primary needs identified were transportation (42%) and housing conditions (27%). Of 216 patients who were seen during pregnancy and postpartum, 24% had a decrease in the number of positive social risk categories from pregnancy to postpartum; 24% had the same; and 52% had an increase. There was a decrease in the number of patients with housing conditions; transportation needs increased. CONCLUSION: A majority of our perinatal patients report at least one social risk factor. The next step is to strengthen our ability to respond to resource needs identified by routine screening.","PeriodicalId":19405,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetrics & Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aog.0000930996.24850.1a","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The District of Columbia has one of the highest maternal mortality rates in the United States. It is estimated that clinical factors account for 20% of health outcomes; the remaining 80% are attributable to other factors including social determinants of health (SDOH). This quality improvement project aims to examine the effectiveness of utilizing screening tools to identify social risk factors during the perinatal period. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of birthing individuals who completed our SDOH screening tool between April 1, 2021, and March 31, 2022. There were 1,106 birthing individuals screened. Social determinants of health were divided into seven risk categories: food insecurity, housing conditions, transportation, safety, legal, finance, and social support. Occurrences of each risk category were analyzed and compared for those who screened at both the pregnancy and postpartum stages. RESULTS: Of the 1,106 patients screened, 72% of the patients screened positive by reporting at least one social risk factor. Of those who screened positive, 81% requested general support. The primary needs identified were transportation (42%) and housing conditions (27%). Of 216 patients who were seen during pregnancy and postpartum, 24% had a decrease in the number of positive social risk categories from pregnancy to postpartum; 24% had the same; and 52% had an increase. There was a decrease in the number of patients with housing conditions; transportation needs increased. CONCLUSION: A majority of our perinatal patients report at least one social risk factor. The next step is to strengthen our ability to respond to resource needs identified by routine screening.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
早期指标表明围产期社会风险因素筛查至关重要[j]
简介:哥伦比亚特区是美国孕产妇死亡率最高的地区之一。据估计,临床因素占健康结果的20%;其余80%可归因于其他因素,包括健康的社会决定因素。这个质量改进项目旨在检查利用筛查工具识别围产期社会风险因素的有效性。方法:我们对在2021年4月1日至2022年3月31日期间完成SDOH筛查工具的分娩个体进行了回顾性分析。共有1106名孕妇接受了筛查。健康的社会决定因素被分为七个风险类别:粮食不安全、住房条件、交通、安全、法律、财政和社会支持。每个风险类别的发生率被分析和比较那些在怀孕和产后阶段进行筛查的人。结果:在接受筛查的1106例患者中,72%的患者通过报告至少一项社会风险因素筛查呈阳性。在筛查呈阳性的人中,81%的人要求一般支持。确定的主要需求是交通(42%)和住房条件(27%)。在216名孕期和产后就诊的患者中,24%的患者从孕期到产后阳性社会风险类别的数量有所减少;24%的人有相同的想法;52%的人增加了。有住房条件的患者数量有所减少;交通需求增加。结论:大多数围生期患者报告至少存在一种社会风险因素。下一步是加强我们对常规筛查确定的资源需求作出反应的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Author Agreement. A Prospective Study to Assess for Histologic Changes on Vulvar Biopsies in Postmenopausal Women With Lichen Sclerosus Treated With Fractionated CO2 Laser Therapy [ID: 1339895] Prescribing Patterns for Postpartum Contraception Among Breastfeeding Patients Insured Under Medicaid [ID: 1375071] Evaluation of Perioperative Factors Contributing to Organ Space Surgical Site Infection After Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy [ID: 1374862] Delays in Diagnosis and Treatment of Appendicitis in Females [ID: 1375790]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1