Year in Review 2021: Noteworthy Literature in Cardiothoracic Anesthesia.

IF 1.1 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia Pub Date : 2022-06-01 DOI:10.1177/10892532221100660

Aaron Smoroda, David Douin, Joseph Morabito, Matthew Lyman, Meghan Prin, Bryan Ahlgren, Andrew Young, Elijah Christensen, Benjamin A Abrams, Nathaen Weitzel, Nathan Clendenen

{"title":"Year in Review 2021: Noteworthy Literature in Cardiothoracic Anesthesia.","authors":"Aaron Smoroda, David Douin, Joseph Morabito, Matthew Lyman, Meghan Prin, Bryan Ahlgren, Andrew Young, Elijah Christensen, Benjamin A Abrams, Nathaen Weitzel, Nathan Clendenen","doi":"10.1177/10892532221100660","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In 2021, progress in clinical science related to Cardiac Anesthesiology continued, but at a slower rate due to the ongoing pandemic and disruptions to clinical research. Most progress was incremental and addressed persistent questions related to our field. To identify articles for this review, we completed a structured review using our previously reported methods (1). Specifically, we used the search terms: \"cardiac anesthesiology and outcomes\" (n = 177), \"cardiothoracic anesthesiology\" (n = 34), \"cardiac anesthesia,\" and \"clinical outcomes\" (n = 42) filtered on clinical trials and the year 2021 in PubMed. We also reviewed clinical trials from the most prominent clinical journals to identify additional studies for a narrative review. We then selected the most noteworthy publications for inclusion in this review and identified key themes.</p>","PeriodicalId":46500,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia","volume":"26 2","pages":"107-119"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9588253/pdf/nihms-1841224.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10892532221100660","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

Abstract

In 2021, progress in clinical science related to Cardiac Anesthesiology continued, but at a slower rate due to the ongoing pandemic and disruptions to clinical research. Most progress was incremental and addressed persistent questions related to our field. To identify articles for this review, we completed a structured review using our previously reported methods (1). Specifically, we used the search terms: "cardiac anesthesiology and outcomes" (n = 177), "cardiothoracic anesthesiology" (n = 34), "cardiac anesthesia," and "clinical outcomes" (n = 42) filtered on clinical trials and the year 2021 in PubMed. We also reviewed clinical trials from the most prominent clinical journals to identify additional studies for a narrative review. We then selected the most noteworthy publications for inclusion in this review and identified key themes.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

2021年回顾:值得注意的心胸麻醉文献。

2021年，与心脏麻醉学相关的临床科学继续取得进展，但由于持续的大流行和临床研究中断，进展速度较慢。大多数进展都是渐进式的，并解决了与我们的领域相关的持久问题。为了确定本综述的文章，我们使用之前报道的方法完成了一项结构化的综述(1)。具体来说，我们使用的搜索词是:“心脏麻醉学和结局”(n = 177)、“心胸麻醉学”(n = 34)、“心脏麻醉”和“临床结局”(n = 42)，筛选了PubMed的临床试验和2021年。我们还回顾了来自最著名的临床期刊的临床试验，以确定用于叙述性回顾的其他研究。然后，我们选择了最值得注意的出版物纳入本综述并确定了关键主题。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia ANESTHESIOLOGY-

CiteScore

3.60

自引率

14.30%

发文量