{"title":"EFFECT OF MIRROR THERAPY VERSUS REPETITIVE FACILITATION EXERCISE ON UPPER LIMB FUNCTION IN POST STROKE PATIENT","authors":"Saba Karamat, Aruba Saeed, F. Khan, Aroosa Tariq","doi":"10.52567/trj.v6i02.128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To compare the effects of task-based mirror therapy and Repetitive Facilitation Exercise on upper limb function in post stroke patient. Methodology: A randomized controlled trial was conducted in Pakistan Railway general hospital, Rawalpindi. The duration of this study was from 10th July to 31st December 2019. Non-probability purposive sampling technique was used with n=50 male and female subacute and chronic post-stroke patients between 40-50 years. The patients with Modified Ashworth Scale <3 and the first-ever stroke was included. The participants were randomly divided by the sealed envelope method into mirror therapy group (n=25) and Repetitive Facilitation Exercise group (n=25). The Upper extremity functional index (UEFI) was used to assess the functional impairment in individuals with upper limb dysfunction, Fugl Meyer (FMA-UE) for assessment of activity in post stroke patients, “Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) for upper extremity performance and functional capability” and Brunnstrom recovery scale (BRS) for motor function of the upper limb was used in a post stroke patient. All the patients were assessed at baseline than after 3 weeks and again after 6week for interventional session of 30 min,3 days of the week. Data were analyzed through SPSS version 23. Results: The mean age of Group A (MT) was 50.97±6.741 and 49.76±12.66 of Group B (RFE). After 6 weeks of intervention between groups analysis of Task-based mirror therapy showed significant improvement in mirror therapy group as compare to Repetitive Facilitation Exercise group ,for upper extremity functional index scores(p<0.001) but for motor assessment(FMA-UE), Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) and for stroke recovery (Brunnstrom) no statistically significant difference (p≥0.05) was found. Within-group analysis of both groups showed statistically significant results in all variables (p<0.001). Conclusion: Mirror therapy and Repetitive facilitation Exercise both were found to be effective in improving upper limb motor functions of acute stroke patients. However, Mirror therapy has shown significant effects in upper extremity functional index. Keywords: Mirror therapy, Physical therapy, Repetitive Facilitation Exercise, Stroke, Upper extremity.","PeriodicalId":90985,"journal":{"name":"The open rehabilitation journal","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The open rehabilitation journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52567/trj.v6i02.128","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To compare the effects of task-based mirror therapy and Repetitive Facilitation Exercise on upper limb function in post stroke patient. Methodology: A randomized controlled trial was conducted in Pakistan Railway general hospital, Rawalpindi. The duration of this study was from 10th July to 31st December 2019. Non-probability purposive sampling technique was used with n=50 male and female subacute and chronic post-stroke patients between 40-50 years. The patients with Modified Ashworth Scale <3 and the first-ever stroke was included. The participants were randomly divided by the sealed envelope method into mirror therapy group (n=25) and Repetitive Facilitation Exercise group (n=25). The Upper extremity functional index (UEFI) was used to assess the functional impairment in individuals with upper limb dysfunction, Fugl Meyer (FMA-UE) for assessment of activity in post stroke patients, “Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) for upper extremity performance and functional capability” and Brunnstrom recovery scale (BRS) for motor function of the upper limb was used in a post stroke patient. All the patients were assessed at baseline than after 3 weeks and again after 6week for interventional session of 30 min,3 days of the week. Data were analyzed through SPSS version 23. Results: The mean age of Group A (MT) was 50.97±6.741 and 49.76±12.66 of Group B (RFE). After 6 weeks of intervention between groups analysis of Task-based mirror therapy showed significant improvement in mirror therapy group as compare to Repetitive Facilitation Exercise group ,for upper extremity functional index scores(p<0.001) but for motor assessment(FMA-UE), Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) and for stroke recovery (Brunnstrom) no statistically significant difference (p≥0.05) was found. Within-group analysis of both groups showed statistically significant results in all variables (p<0.001). Conclusion: Mirror therapy and Repetitive facilitation Exercise both were found to be effective in improving upper limb motor functions of acute stroke patients. However, Mirror therapy has shown significant effects in upper extremity functional index. Keywords: Mirror therapy, Physical therapy, Repetitive Facilitation Exercise, Stroke, Upper extremity.
目的:比较任务型镜像治疗与重复性促进训练对脑卒中后患者上肢功能的影响。方法:在拉瓦尔品第巴基斯坦铁路总医院进行随机对照试验。本次研究的持续时间为2019年7月10日至12月31日。采用非概率目的抽样技术,对40-50岁的亚急性和慢性脑卒中后患者进行了n=50例的研究。纳入改良Ashworth量表<3和首次卒中患者。采用密封信封法随机分为镜像治疗组(n=25)和重复性促进练习组(n=25)。采用上肢功能指数(UEFI)评估上肢功能障碍患者的功能损害,采用Fugl Meyer (FMA-UE)评估脑卒中后患者的活动,采用Wolf运动功能测试(WMFT)评估上肢表现和功能能力,采用Brunnstrom恢复量表(BRS)评估脑卒中后患者的上肢运动功能。所有患者在基线时进行评估,3周后进行评估,6周后进行评估,每周3天,每次30分钟。数据采用SPSS version 23进行分析。结果:A组(MT)平均年龄为50.97±6.741岁,B组(RFE)平均年龄为49.76±12.66岁。干预6周后,任务型镜像治疗组与重复性促进运动组相比,上肢功能指数得分有显著改善(p<0.001),但运动评估(FMA-UE)、Wolf运动功能测试(WMFT)和脑卒中恢复(Brunnstrom)无统计学差异(p≥0.05)。两组的组内分析结果均有统计学意义(p<0.001)。结论:镜像疗法和重复性促进训练均能有效改善急性脑卒中患者的上肢运动功能。然而,镜像疗法对上肢功能指数有显著的影响。关键词:镜像疗法,物理疗法,重复性促进练习,中风,上肢。