Evolution of China regulatory guidance on the clinical evaluation of medical devices and its implication on pre-market and post-approval clinical evaluation strategies.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL Expert Review of Medical Devices Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.1080/17434440.2023.2184258
Gui Su, Dongyuan Deng
{"title":"Evolution of China regulatory guidance on the clinical evaluation of medical devices and its implication on pre-market and post-approval clinical evaluation strategies.","authors":"Gui Su,&nbsp;Dongyuan Deng","doi":"10.1080/17434440.2023.2184258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The rapid growth of the medical device industry has driven the evolution of regulatory guidance on medical device clinical evaluation (MDCE) of the China National Medical Products Administration (NMPA), which consequently influences pre-market and post-approval clinical evaluation (CE) strategies.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>We aimed to investigate the 3-stage evolution of NMPA regulatory guidance on MDCE (1. The era before specific CE guidance, 2. 2015 CE Guidance, and 3. 2021 CE Guidance Series), analyze the gaps between each stage, and assess the evolution's impact on pre-market and post-approval CE strategies.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>The fundamental principles of the NMPA 2021 CE Guidance Series were transformed from the 2019 International Medical Device Regulatory Forum documents. Compared with the 2015 guidance, the 2021 CE Guidance Series further clarifies the CE definition by emphasizing the ongoing activity of CE through an entire product lifecycle and the use of scientifically sound methods for CE and narrows the pre-market CE pathways into the equivalent device and clinical trial pathways. The 2021 CE Guidance Series simplifies the process for selecting the pre-market CE strategy but does not specify post-approval CE update cadency and general requirements for post-market clinical follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":12330,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Medical Devices","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Medical Devices","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17434440.2023.2184258","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The rapid growth of the medical device industry has driven the evolution of regulatory guidance on medical device clinical evaluation (MDCE) of the China National Medical Products Administration (NMPA), which consequently influences pre-market and post-approval clinical evaluation (CE) strategies.

Areas covered: We aimed to investigate the 3-stage evolution of NMPA regulatory guidance on MDCE (1. The era before specific CE guidance, 2. 2015 CE Guidance, and 3. 2021 CE Guidance Series), analyze the gaps between each stage, and assess the evolution's impact on pre-market and post-approval CE strategies.

Expert opinion: The fundamental principles of the NMPA 2021 CE Guidance Series were transformed from the 2019 International Medical Device Regulatory Forum documents. Compared with the 2015 guidance, the 2021 CE Guidance Series further clarifies the CE definition by emphasizing the ongoing activity of CE through an entire product lifecycle and the use of scientifically sound methods for CE and narrows the pre-market CE pathways into the equivalent device and clinical trial pathways. The 2021 CE Guidance Series simplifies the process for selecting the pre-market CE strategy but does not specify post-approval CE update cadency and general requirements for post-market clinical follow-up.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国医疗器械临床评价监管指导的演变及其对上市前和批准后临床评价策略的启示
导读:医疗器械行业的快速发展推动了中国国家药品监督管理局(NMPA)对医疗器械临床评价(MDCE)监管指导的演变,从而影响了上市前和批准后的临床评价(CE)策略。涵盖领域:我们旨在调查NMPA对MDCE监管指导的三个阶段演变(1)。具体CE指导前的时代;2 . 2015 CE指南;2021 CE指南系列),分析每个阶段之间的差距,并评估演变对上市前和批准后CE战略的影响。专家意见:NMPA 2021 CE指南系列的基本原则是由2019年国际医疗器械监管论坛文件转化而来。与2015年指南相比,2021年CE指南系列进一步明确了CE的定义,强调了CE在整个产品生命周期中的持续活动,以及对CE使用科学合理的方法,并将上市前的CE途径缩小为等效的设备和临床试验途径。2021 CE指南系列简化了选择上市前CE策略的过程,但没有规定批准后CE更新速度和上市后临床随访的一般要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Expert Review of Medical Devices
Expert Review of Medical Devices 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
69
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal serves the device research community by providing a comprehensive body of high-quality information from leading experts, all subject to rigorous peer review. The Expert Review format is specially structured to optimize the value of the information to reader. Comprehensive coverage by each author in a key area of research or clinical practice is augmented by the following sections: Expert commentary - a personal view on the most effective or promising strategies Five-year view - a clear perspective of future prospects within a realistic timescale Key issues - an executive summary cutting to the author''s most critical points In addition to the Review program, each issue also features Medical Device Profiles - objective assessments of specific devices in development or clinical use to help inform clinical practice. There are also Perspectives - overviews highlighting areas of current debate and controversy, together with reports from the conference scene and invited Editorials.
期刊最新文献
Future perspectives and challenges of artificial intelligence implementation in remote monitoring of cardiac implantable electronic devices. His bundle pacing combined with atrioventricular node ablation for atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Complications after peripherally inserted central catheter versus central venous catheter implantation in intensive care unit: propensity score analysis using a nationwide database. Thoracic impedance monitoring in heart failure: from theory to practice. Dynamic versus standard bougies for tracheal intubation with direct or indirect laryngoscopy in simulated or real scenarios: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1