Testing and Validation of a Custom CAD Tool to Support Design for Manufacturing: An Experimental Study

Apurva Patel, J. Summers, A. Patel, James L. Mathieson, Michael P. Sbarra, Joshua Ortiz
{"title":"Testing and Validation of a Custom CAD Tool to Support Design for Manufacturing: An Experimental Study","authors":"Apurva Patel, J. Summers, A. Patel, James L. Mathieson, Michael P. Sbarra, Joshua Ortiz","doi":"10.1115/detc2021-69820","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n While fundamentals of DFMA are widely accepted and used in the engineering design community, many CAD environments lack tools that address manufacturing concerns and provide rapid feedback to designers about manufacturing impacts of their design choices. This paper presents an experiment-based testing and validation of a rapid feedback tool that provides users a history-based prediction of manufacturing time based on the current state of the design. A between-subjects experiment is designed to evaluate the impact of the tool on design outcomes based on modeling time, part mass, and manufacturing time. Participants in the study included mechanical engineering graduate and undergraduate students with at least one semester of experience using SolidWorks. The experiment included three different design activities and three different conditions of the design tool. Participants completed up to three sessions with different experimental conditions. Analysis of the data collected shows that use of the design tool results in a small but nonsignificant increase in modeling time. Moreover, use of the tool results in reduced part mass on average, as well as in a within-subject comparison. Tool use reduced manufacturing time in open ended activities, but increased manufacturing time when activities focus more on mass-reduction. Participant feedback suggests that the tool helped guide their material removal actions by showing the impact on manufacturing time. Finally, potential improvements and future expansions of the tool are discussed.","PeriodicalId":23602,"journal":{"name":"Volume 2: 41st Computers and Information in Engineering Conference (CIE)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 2: 41st Computers and Information in Engineering Conference (CIE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/detc2021-69820","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

While fundamentals of DFMA are widely accepted and used in the engineering design community, many CAD environments lack tools that address manufacturing concerns and provide rapid feedback to designers about manufacturing impacts of their design choices. This paper presents an experiment-based testing and validation of a rapid feedback tool that provides users a history-based prediction of manufacturing time based on the current state of the design. A between-subjects experiment is designed to evaluate the impact of the tool on design outcomes based on modeling time, part mass, and manufacturing time. Participants in the study included mechanical engineering graduate and undergraduate students with at least one semester of experience using SolidWorks. The experiment included three different design activities and three different conditions of the design tool. Participants completed up to three sessions with different experimental conditions. Analysis of the data collected shows that use of the design tool results in a small but nonsignificant increase in modeling time. Moreover, use of the tool results in reduced part mass on average, as well as in a within-subject comparison. Tool use reduced manufacturing time in open ended activities, but increased manufacturing time when activities focus more on mass-reduction. Participant feedback suggests that the tool helped guide their material removal actions by showing the impact on manufacturing time. Finally, potential improvements and future expansions of the tool are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
支持制造设计的定制CAD工具的测试和验证:一项实验研究
虽然DFMA的基本原理在工程设计界被广泛接受和使用,但许多CAD环境缺乏解决制造问题的工具,无法向设计师提供有关其设计选择对制造影响的快速反馈。本文介绍了一种基于实验的快速反馈工具的测试和验证,该工具可以根据设计的当前状态为用户提供基于历史的制造时间预测。设计了一个受试者之间的实验,以评估基于建模时间、零件质量和制造时间的工具对设计结果的影响。该研究的参与者包括机械工程研究生和至少有一个学期使用SolidWorks经验的本科生。实验包括三种不同的设计活动和三种不同的设计工具条件。参与者在不同的实验条件下完成了多达三次的实验。对收集到的数据的分析表明,使用设计工具会导致建模时间的小幅但不显著的增加。此外,使用该工具的结果减少了零件质量的平均,以及在主题内比较。在开放式活动中,工具的使用减少了制造时间,但当活动更多地关注减少质量时,工具的使用增加了制造时间。参与者的反馈表明,该工具通过显示对制造时间的影响,帮助指导他们的材料去除行动。最后,讨论了该工具的潜在改进和未来扩展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Bus Factor in Conceptual System Design: Protecting a Design Process Against Major Regional and World Events Exploration of the Digital Innovation Process in the Smart Product-Service System Optimized Torque Assistance During Walking With an Idealized Hip Exoskeleton An Algorithm for Partitioning Objects Into a Cube Skeleton and Segmented Shell Covers for Parallelized Additive Manufacturing Neurocognitive Effects of Incentivizing Students to Improve Performance Through Repeat Attempts in Design Settings
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1