Yi Guo, Jinye Wu, Xueying Zheng, Chang Yin, Zhenyu Wu
{"title":"The First-Year Variation in Central Retinal Thickness Predicts Legal Blindness in Patients with Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration.","authors":"Yi Guo, Jinye Wu, Xueying Zheng, Chang Yin, Zhenyu Wu","doi":"10.1159/000528161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Due to its progressive nature, early evaluation and timely prediction of legal blindness are important in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). We examined the association between early-stage variation in central retinal thickness (CRT) and long-term visual outcomes in patients with nAMD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included 103 nAMD patients who were administered anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF). Participants were considered qualified if they were (1) 50 years and older, (2) treatment-naïve, (3) received standard anti-VEGF treatment and had complete baseline information. We further excluded patients with less than 1-year follow-up data and those who experienced best corrected visual acuity ≤35. Early-stage variability in CRT was measured as the first-year coefficient of variability (CV) of CRT. Patients were then classified into the high-variability and low-variability groups according to the X-tile. A product-limit plot was used to demonstrate the differences and tested with the log-rank test. The association between first-year variability and visual outcomes was quantified using Cox regression models. Time-to-event primary endpoint was the overall visual preservation (OVP) rate, defined as the time from the first injection to legal blindness, i.e., best corrected visual acuity ≤35 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A threshold of 20% of first-year CV in CRT was used to categorize 76 qualified patients into high variability (35, 46.1%) and low variability (41, 53.9%). The 5- and 10-year OVPs for patients with high versus low variability were 76% versus 48% and 59% versus 22%, respectively. High early-stage CRT variability showed a significantly higher risk of legal blindness. Even after adjusting for the demographic and clinical features, the variability remained significant (HR = 2.39, 95% CI: 1.20-4.78).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>First-year variability of CRT was predictive of long-term visual outcomes in patients with nAMD, and 20% of the variability could be used as a clinically convenient threshold to qualitatively classify patients into high- and low-variability groups. The current study is important for identifying high-risk populations and for long-term disease management.</p>","PeriodicalId":19662,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic Research","volume":" ","pages":"406-412"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10015761/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmic Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000528161","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/11/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Introduction: Due to its progressive nature, early evaluation and timely prediction of legal blindness are important in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). We examined the association between early-stage variation in central retinal thickness (CRT) and long-term visual outcomes in patients with nAMD.
Methods: We included 103 nAMD patients who were administered anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF). Participants were considered qualified if they were (1) 50 years and older, (2) treatment-naïve, (3) received standard anti-VEGF treatment and had complete baseline information. We further excluded patients with less than 1-year follow-up data and those who experienced best corrected visual acuity ≤35. Early-stage variability in CRT was measured as the first-year coefficient of variability (CV) of CRT. Patients were then classified into the high-variability and low-variability groups according to the X-tile. A product-limit plot was used to demonstrate the differences and tested with the log-rank test. The association between first-year variability and visual outcomes was quantified using Cox regression models. Time-to-event primary endpoint was the overall visual preservation (OVP) rate, defined as the time from the first injection to legal blindness, i.e., best corrected visual acuity ≤35 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters.
Results: A threshold of 20% of first-year CV in CRT was used to categorize 76 qualified patients into high variability (35, 46.1%) and low variability (41, 53.9%). The 5- and 10-year OVPs for patients with high versus low variability were 76% versus 48% and 59% versus 22%, respectively. High early-stage CRT variability showed a significantly higher risk of legal blindness. Even after adjusting for the demographic and clinical features, the variability remained significant (HR = 2.39, 95% CI: 1.20-4.78).
Conclusion: First-year variability of CRT was predictive of long-term visual outcomes in patients with nAMD, and 20% of the variability could be used as a clinically convenient threshold to qualitatively classify patients into high- and low-variability groups. The current study is important for identifying high-risk populations and for long-term disease management.
期刊介绍:
''Ophthalmic Research'' features original papers and reviews reporting on translational and clinical studies. Authors from throughout the world cover research topics on every field in connection with physical, physiologic, pharmacological, biochemical and molecular biological aspects of ophthalmology. This journal also aims to provide a record of international clinical research for both researchers and clinicians in ophthalmology. Finally, the transfer of information from fundamental research to clinical research and clinical practice is particularly welcome.