A systematic scoping review of digital health technologies during COVID-19: a new normal in primary health care delivery.

IF 3.1 Q2 MEDICAL INFORMATICS Health and Technology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1007/s12553-023-00725-7
Costase Ndayishimiye, Henrique Lopes, John Middleton
{"title":"A systematic scoping review of digital health technologies during COVID-19: a new normal in primary health care delivery.","authors":"Costase Ndayishimiye,&nbsp;Henrique Lopes,&nbsp;John Middleton","doi":"10.1007/s12553-023-00725-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This scoping review compiled information concerning digital health technologies (DHTs) evolution to support primary health care (PHC) during COVID-19 and lessons for the future of PHC. The identified literature was published during the COVID-19 peak years (2019-2021), retrieved from PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar, as well as hand searched on the internet. Predefined inclusion criteria were used, thematic analysis was applied, and reporting followed the PRISMA for Scoping Reviews. A total of 46 studies were included in the final synthesis (40 articles, one book, two book chapters, one working paper, and two technical reports). These studies scrutinized various aspects of DHTs, entailing 19 types of DHTs with 20 areas of use that can be compressed into five bigger PHC functions: general PHC service delivery (teleconsultations, e-diagnosis, e-prescription, etc.); behavior promotion and digital health literacy (e.g., combating vaccine hesitancy); surveillance functions; vaccination and drugs; and enhancing system decision-making for proper follow-up of ongoing PHC interventions during COVID-19. DHTs have the potential to solve some of the problems that have plagued us even prior to COVID-19. Therefore, this study uses a forward-looking viewpoint to further stimulate the use of evidence-based DHT, making it more inclusive, educative, and satisfying to people's needs, both under normal conditions and during outbreaks. More research with narrowed research questions is needed, with a particular emphasis on quality assurance in the use of DHTs, technical aspects (standards for digital health tools, infrastructure, and platforms), and financial perspectives (payment for digital health services and adoption incentives).</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12553-023-00725-7.</p>","PeriodicalId":12941,"journal":{"name":"Health and Technology","volume":"13 2","pages":"273-284"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9816012/pdf/","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12553-023-00725-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

This scoping review compiled information concerning digital health technologies (DHTs) evolution to support primary health care (PHC) during COVID-19 and lessons for the future of PHC. The identified literature was published during the COVID-19 peak years (2019-2021), retrieved from PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar, as well as hand searched on the internet. Predefined inclusion criteria were used, thematic analysis was applied, and reporting followed the PRISMA for Scoping Reviews. A total of 46 studies were included in the final synthesis (40 articles, one book, two book chapters, one working paper, and two technical reports). These studies scrutinized various aspects of DHTs, entailing 19 types of DHTs with 20 areas of use that can be compressed into five bigger PHC functions: general PHC service delivery (teleconsultations, e-diagnosis, e-prescription, etc.); behavior promotion and digital health literacy (e.g., combating vaccine hesitancy); surveillance functions; vaccination and drugs; and enhancing system decision-making for proper follow-up of ongoing PHC interventions during COVID-19. DHTs have the potential to solve some of the problems that have plagued us even prior to COVID-19. Therefore, this study uses a forward-looking viewpoint to further stimulate the use of evidence-based DHT, making it more inclusive, educative, and satisfying to people's needs, both under normal conditions and during outbreaks. More research with narrowed research questions is needed, with a particular emphasis on quality assurance in the use of DHTs, technical aspects (standards for digital health tools, infrastructure, and platforms), and financial perspectives (payment for digital health services and adoption incentives).

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12553-023-00725-7.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2019冠状病毒病期间数字卫生技术的系统范围审查:初级卫生保健服务的新常态
该范围审查汇编了有关数字卫生技术(dht)发展的信息,以支持2019冠状病毒病期间的初级卫生保健(PHC),并为初级卫生保健的未来提供了经验教训。所确定的文献发表于COVID-19高峰年份(2019-2021),检索自PubMed、Scopus和Google Scholar,并在互联网上手工检索。使用预定义的纳入标准,应用专题分析,并按照PRISMA进行范围审查报告。最终的综合报告共纳入46项研究(40篇文章、1本书、2本书章节、1份工作论文和2份技术报告)。这些研究详细审查了dht的各个方面,涉及19种dht的20个使用领域,可压缩为五个更大的初级保健功能:一般初级保健服务提供(远程会诊、电子诊断、电子处方等);促进行为和数字卫生素养(例如,消除疫苗犹豫);监测功能;疫苗接种和药物;加强系统决策,以便在COVID-19期间对正在进行的初级保健干预措施进行适当随访。dht有可能解决甚至在COVID-19之前就困扰我们的一些问题。因此,本研究采用前瞻性的观点,进一步促进以证据为基础的DHT的使用,使其在正常情况下和疫情期间都更具包容性、教育性和满足人们的需求。需要进行更多的研究,缩小研究问题,特别强调dht使用的质量保证、技术方面(数字卫生工具、基础设施和平台的标准)和财务方面(数字卫生服务的支付和采用激励措施)。补充信息:在线版本包含补充资料,下载地址为10.1007/s12553-023-00725-7。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health and Technology
Health and Technology MEDICAL INFORMATICS-
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
83
期刊介绍: Health and Technology is the first truly cross-disciplinary journal on issues related to health technologies addressing all professions relating to health, care and health technology.The journal constitutes an information platform connecting medical technology and informatics with the needs of care, health care professionals and patients. Thus, medical physicists and biomedical/clinical engineers are encouraged to write articles not only for their colleagues, but directed to all other groups of readers as well, and vice versa.By its nature, the journal presents and discusses hot subjects including but not limited to patient safety, patient empowerment, disease surveillance and management, e-health and issues concerning data security, privacy, reliability and management, data mining and knowledge exchange as well as health prevention. The journal also addresses the medical, financial, social, educational and safety aspects of health technologies as well as health technology assessment and management, including issues such security, efficacy, cost in comparison to the benefit, as well as social, legal and ethical implications.This journal is a communicative source for the health work force (physicians, nurses, medical physicists, clinical engineers, biomedical engineers, hospital engineers, etc.), the ministries of health, hospital management, self-employed doctors, health care providers and regulatory agencies, the medical technology industry, patients'' associations, universities (biomedical and clinical engineering, medical physics, medical informatics, biology, medicine and public health as well as health economics programs), research institutes and professional, scientific and technical organizations.Health and Technology is jointly published by Springer and the IUPESM (International Union for Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine) in cooperation with the World Health Organization.
期刊最新文献
Health disparity in digital health technology design Training protocol for driving power wheelchairs using virtual environment: preliminary results from a pilot study COVID-19 vaccine prediction based on an interpretable CNN-LSTM model with three-stage feature engineering Detection of Cardio Vascular abnormalities using gradient descent optimization and CNN Unsupervised machine learning for disease prediction: a comparative performance analysis using multiple datasets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1