Timothy Clark. The Cambridge Introduction to Literature and the Environment

IF 0.2 3区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS ANGLIA-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR ENGLISCHE PHILOLOGIE Pub Date : 2012-01-01 DOI:10.1515/ang-2012-0008
Christina Caupert
{"title":"Timothy Clark. The Cambridge Introduction to Literature and the Environment","authors":"Christina Caupert","doi":"10.1515/ang-2012-0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The title of this volume, Literature and the Environment, may at first seem to indicate a more traditional ecocritical focus on environmentally themed fiction and nature writing, but it proves a flexible choice that allows the inclusion of a wide range of diverging critical approaches to environmental crisis in a broad sense. Indeed, the study points out that, considering the ultimately inconceivable apocalyptic potential of phenomena like climate change and overpopulation, the lack of any “recognized” and standardized bundle of methods may ultimately be one of ecocriticism’s salient qualities: “the unprecedented challenge ... may be the need, literally, to think everything, even to think everything at once” (203). What characterizes ecocriticism, then, is the attempt to overcome boundaries between disciplines and forms of “knowing” the world that have long been considered incompatible, in an effort not only to restructure the relationship of the cultural to the natural world, but also to reconsider what these very concepts might mean. Clark emphasizes that what is called into question is nothing less than “the now dominant liberal humanist conception of the human self” (65), along with its ideas of individual liberty and individual rights. This is a bold and far-reaching statement that needs careful differentiation, especially in an introductory work: while we unquestionably have to rethink what deserves to be recognized as a “right”, few ecocritics would wish to abolish the concept itself. Likewise, although the author is right that environmental damage cannot be kept in check without effective legislation and an “engagement with those national and global structures of economics and forms of government that are ultimately more responsible” (136) than individual lifestyle decisions, this should not lead us to make light of our own, individual, share of responsibilities. Giving an introduction to so polymorphic a field is a tricky task, even more so as the author announces in his preface that he aims for “a tighter synthesis” than the existing essay collections were able to achieve, a “lucid conceptual introduction more familiar to other schools of literary or cultural theory” (xiii). But Clark does indeed meet the challenge. Manageably structured into an introductory outline of the field of study plus twenty concise, thematic chapters, each about ten pages in length, and written in a highly readable style that still tries to avoid reductions and provoke thought, the book is certainly a suitable source for students wishing to get a general overview of the subject area. Lists of further reading, a detailed index and highlighted boxes with additional examples and explanations, as well as socalled “quandaries” (ongoing critical debates and unresolved conflicts), contribute to its user-friendly lucidity. In terms of content, the volume makes a point of demonstrating the wide scope of concerns connected with the study of literature and the environment, dealing with issues that range from romanticism to postcolonialism, and from politics to ethics and philosophy. However, both the selection of topics and the positions","PeriodicalId":43572,"journal":{"name":"ANGLIA-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR ENGLISCHE PHILOLOGIE","volume":"60 1","pages":"130 - 131"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ANGLIA-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR ENGLISCHE PHILOLOGIE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/ang-2012-0008","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The title of this volume, Literature and the Environment, may at first seem to indicate a more traditional ecocritical focus on environmentally themed fiction and nature writing, but it proves a flexible choice that allows the inclusion of a wide range of diverging critical approaches to environmental crisis in a broad sense. Indeed, the study points out that, considering the ultimately inconceivable apocalyptic potential of phenomena like climate change and overpopulation, the lack of any “recognized” and standardized bundle of methods may ultimately be one of ecocriticism’s salient qualities: “the unprecedented challenge ... may be the need, literally, to think everything, even to think everything at once” (203). What characterizes ecocriticism, then, is the attempt to overcome boundaries between disciplines and forms of “knowing” the world that have long been considered incompatible, in an effort not only to restructure the relationship of the cultural to the natural world, but also to reconsider what these very concepts might mean. Clark emphasizes that what is called into question is nothing less than “the now dominant liberal humanist conception of the human self” (65), along with its ideas of individual liberty and individual rights. This is a bold and far-reaching statement that needs careful differentiation, especially in an introductory work: while we unquestionably have to rethink what deserves to be recognized as a “right”, few ecocritics would wish to abolish the concept itself. Likewise, although the author is right that environmental damage cannot be kept in check without effective legislation and an “engagement with those national and global structures of economics and forms of government that are ultimately more responsible” (136) than individual lifestyle decisions, this should not lead us to make light of our own, individual, share of responsibilities. Giving an introduction to so polymorphic a field is a tricky task, even more so as the author announces in his preface that he aims for “a tighter synthesis” than the existing essay collections were able to achieve, a “lucid conceptual introduction more familiar to other schools of literary or cultural theory” (xiii). But Clark does indeed meet the challenge. Manageably structured into an introductory outline of the field of study plus twenty concise, thematic chapters, each about ten pages in length, and written in a highly readable style that still tries to avoid reductions and provoke thought, the book is certainly a suitable source for students wishing to get a general overview of the subject area. Lists of further reading, a detailed index and highlighted boxes with additional examples and explanations, as well as socalled “quandaries” (ongoing critical debates and unresolved conflicts), contribute to its user-friendly lucidity. In terms of content, the volume makes a point of demonstrating the wide scope of concerns connected with the study of literature and the environment, dealing with issues that range from romanticism to postcolonialism, and from politics to ethics and philosophy. However, both the selection of topics and the positions
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
蒂莫西·克拉克。剑桥文学与环境导论
本卷的标题,文学与环境,乍一看似乎表明一个更传统的生态批评的重点是环境主题的小说和自然写作,但它证明了一个灵活的选择,允许包括广泛的环境危机的不同的批评方法在广义上。事实上,该研究指出,考虑到气候变化和人口过剩等现象最终难以想象的世界末日潜力,缺乏任何“公认的”和标准化的方法可能最终成为生态批评的一个显著特征:“前所未有的挑战……从字面上看,可能是需要思考一切,甚至是同时思考一切”(203)。因此,生态批评的特点是,试图克服学科和“认识”世界的形式之间的界限,这些界限长期以来被认为是不相容的,不仅要努力重构文化与自然世界的关系,而且要重新考虑这些概念可能意味着什么。这是一个大胆而深远的声明,需要仔细区分,特别是在入门作品中:虽然我们毫无疑问必须重新思考什么值得被认为是“权利”,但很少有生态批评家希望废除这个概念本身。同样,尽管作者认为,如果没有有效的立法,没有“参与那些最终比个人生活方式更负责任的国家和全球经济结构和政府形式”(136),环境破坏就无法得到控制,但这不应导致我们轻视自己的、个人的责任份额。对如此多形态的领域进行介绍是一项棘手的任务,甚至正如作者在前言中宣布的那样,他的目标是“更紧密的综合”,而不是现有的散文集能够实现的,一个“其他文学或文化理论学派更熟悉的清晰概念性介绍”(xiii)。但克拉克确实迎接了挑战。这本书的结构很好,分为一个研究领域的介绍性大纲,加上20个简明的主题章节,每个章节大约10页长,以一种高度可读的风格写作,仍然试图避免删节和引发思考,对于希望获得主题领域总体概况的学生来说,这本书当然是一个合适的来源。进一步阅读的列表,详细的索引和突出显示的额外例子和解释框,以及所谓的“困境”(正在进行的关键辩论和未解决的冲突),有助于其用户友好的清晰。在内容方面,该卷表明了与文学和环境研究相关的广泛关注,处理从浪漫主义到后殖民主义,从政治到伦理和哲学的问题。然而,无论是选题还是立场
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: The journal of English philology, Anglia, was founded in 1878 by Moritz Trautmann and Richard P. Wülker, and is thus the oldest journal of English studies. Anglia covers a large part of the expanding field of English philology. It publishes essays on the English language and linguistic history, on English literature of the Middle Ages and the Modern period, on American literature, the newer literature in the English language, and on general and comparative literary studies, also including cultural and literary theory aspects. Further, Anglia contains reviews from the areas mentioned..
期刊最新文献
The “Ecological Imperative” in Literary Studies Thomas D’Urfey’s Adaptation of Cervantes’s Quixote: The Comical History of Don Quixote The Maypole of Merry Vagabonds: Hawthorne’s “The Seven Vagabonds” and the Birth of Conservative Utopia The Cosmopolitan Stranger in Muriel Spark’s The Finishing School “Words, Words, Words”: Mourid Barghouti’s Appropriation of Shakespeare’s Hamlet in I Saw Ramallah
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1