Associations Between Implicit and Explicit Condom Use Measures With Condom Use Barriers: Relationships Make A Difference.

IF 1.7 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Psychological Reports Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2023-03-17 DOI:10.1177/00332941231164334
Einav Levy, Lisa M Warner, Lena Fleig, Michelle R Kaufman, Yori Gidron
{"title":"Associations Between Implicit and Explicit Condom Use Measures With Condom Use Barriers: Relationships Make A Difference.","authors":"Einav Levy, Lisa M Warner, Lena Fleig, Michelle R Kaufman, Yori Gidron","doi":"10.1177/00332941231164334","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The association between explicit and implicit psychological measures might be affected by the similarity of the assessment method and by the overlap of the components of the constructs being assessed. This study examined the association between condom use barriers and explicit and implicit measurements of condom use and the moderating role of sexual intercourse in these associations.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This was a cross sectional correlational study. An analysis of baseline data from a randomized controlled trial including 149 university students was included.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>These included a questionnaire assessing condom use barriers, an implicit condom use test (a structured semi-projective test), and an explicit condom use question. Hierarchical regressions and correlations were examined in the full sample and by groups of participants with and without sexual intercourse.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In those without sexual intercourse, all barriers sub-scales were significantly and negatively correlated with implicit condom use and unrelated to explicit condom use. In contrast, among those engaged in sexual intercourse, barriers were significantly and negatively correlated with the explicit condom use measure, and only barriers concerning partner and motivation correlated with implicit condom use tendencies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Having a sexual partner plays a major role in the relations between barriers and implicit and explicit condom use measures. The pattern of the results is discussed in relation to cognitive and social factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":21149,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Reports","volume":" ","pages":"617-637"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Reports","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941231164334","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The association between explicit and implicit psychological measures might be affected by the similarity of the assessment method and by the overlap of the components of the constructs being assessed. This study examined the association between condom use barriers and explicit and implicit measurements of condom use and the moderating role of sexual intercourse in these associations.

Design: This was a cross sectional correlational study. An analysis of baseline data from a randomized controlled trial including 149 university students was included.

Main measures: These included a questionnaire assessing condom use barriers, an implicit condom use test (a structured semi-projective test), and an explicit condom use question. Hierarchical regressions and correlations were examined in the full sample and by groups of participants with and without sexual intercourse.

Results: In those without sexual intercourse, all barriers sub-scales were significantly and negatively correlated with implicit condom use and unrelated to explicit condom use. In contrast, among those engaged in sexual intercourse, barriers were significantly and negatively correlated with the explicit condom use measure, and only barriers concerning partner and motivation correlated with implicit condom use tendencies.

Conclusion: Having a sexual partner plays a major role in the relations between barriers and implicit and explicit condom use measures. The pattern of the results is discussed in relation to cognitive and social factors.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
隐性和显性安全套使用措施与安全套使用障碍之间的联系:关系会产生影响。
目的:外显和内隐心理测量的相关性可能受到评估方法相似性和被评估构念成分重叠的影响。本研究考察了安全套使用障碍与安全套使用的显性和隐性测量之间的关联,以及性交在这些关联中的调节作用。设计:这是一项横断面相关研究。对一项包括149名大学生的随机对照试验的基线数据进行分析。主要措施:包括评估避孕套使用障碍的问卷、隐性避孕套使用测试(结构化半投影测试)和显性避孕套使用问题。在整个样本和有和没有性交的参与者组中检查了层次回归和相关性。结果:在无性交行为的人群中,所有障碍子量表与隐性安全套使用呈显著负相关,与显性安全套使用无关。而在发生性行为的人群中,障碍与显性安全套使用措施呈显著负相关,仅与伴侣和动机相关的障碍与隐性安全套使用倾向相关。结论:性伴侣在性障碍与显性和隐性安全套使用措施的关系中起主要作用。结果的模式与认知和社会因素的关系进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychological Reports
Psychological Reports PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
171
期刊最新文献
The Black Unicorn Effect: Micro-daily Events and Satisfaction Decrease the COVID-19 Xenophobia, but Only for Those With Low Levels of Neuroticism. Covid-Related Stress in the Financial, Relational and Health Domains. Which Longitudinal Effects on Present and Future Perception? Associations Between Implicit and Explicit Condom Use Measures With Condom Use Barriers: Relationships Make A Difference. Perceived Government Transparency and COVID-19 Conspiracy Beliefs: The Mediating Role of Conspiracy Mentality. The Moderating Role of Perceived Partner Responsiveness Between Implicit Theories of Relationships and Romantic Relationship Satisfaction.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1